Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education (한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육)

The Korean Elementary Science Education Society (한국초등과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Analysis on the Types of Representation to Communicate in Elementary Science and Mathematics Textbooks - In Case of the Sixth Grade 1st Semester -

초등 과학·수학 교과서의 의사소통 표현 방식에 따른 유형 비교 분석 - 6학년 1학기를 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2017.08.07
  • Accepted : 2017.08.28
  • Published : 2017.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to study and learn more features how this type of distribution for communication in $6^{th}$ grade first semester elementary science and mathematics according to communicative expression by 2009 revised curriculum. For this study, based on an analysis standard presented in previous research on the types of communication. The results of this research are as follows. First, because the mathematics presents the number of ways to communicate twice more than science, mathematics go through with much more problems to solve than science. Second, in mathematics, spoken method and written method have similar proportion, less in physical activity method. Third, Science showed balanced proportion among four areas; earth, life, energy, and material. On the other hand, mathematics only showed small numbers in the area of geometry but similar numbers in number and operations, regularity, measurement. Fourth, there is no common feature or relevance about communicative approach for convergence thinking in 2009 revised curriculum, it seems that it doesn't consider it as a revised.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육과학기술부 (2009). 2009 개정 교육과정. 별책 8, 별책 9.
  2. 교육부 (2015). 2015개정 교육과정. 별책 8, 별책 9.
  3. 김상화, 방정숙 (2010). 초등학교에서의 수학적 의사소통 목표와 성취 요소 설정 -D, R, O, C 유형을 중심으로-. 수학교육논문집, 24(2), 385-413.
  4. 김은하 (2012). 아동문학을 활용한 수학수업이 수학적 의사소통에 미치는 효과. 한국초등수학학회지, 16(1), 97-124.
  5. 김한별 (2015). 토의활동을 강화한 실험수업이 초등학생의 과학적 의사소통능력에 미치는 영향. 경인교육대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.
  6. 문옥춘, 양성호 (2011). 수학적 의사소통 수업이 학업 성취도와 수학적 성향 및 태도에 미치는 영향-중학교 2학년을 중심으로-. 교육과학연구, 13(2), 189-207.
  7. 전성수 (2013). 초등학생의 과학적 의사소통능력 검사도구 개발. 한국교원대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  8. 전성수, 박종호 (2014). 초등학생의 과학적 의사소통능력과 과학 탐구능력, 논리적 사고력, 학업 성취도 수준과의 관계 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 37(4), 647-655.
  9. 한유화 (2012). 과학적 의사소통능력을 기르기 위한 교실 탐구모델 개발. 한국교원대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  10. Allwright, R. (1976). The communication approch to language teaching. ELT Documents.
  11. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1990). Science - A Process Approach(SAPA II). Delta Education.
  12. Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1
  13. Chomsky, A. N. (2005). Language and mind.(3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  14. Garvey, W. D. & Griffith, B. C. (1972). Communication and information processing within scientific disciplines: Empirical findings for psychology. Information Storage and Retrieval, 8(3), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0271(72)90041-1
  15. Griffiths, R. & Clyne, M. (1994). Language in the mathematics classroom: Talking, representing, recording. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  16. Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347-1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549
  17. Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. In Pride, J. B., & Holmes, J. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics, 269-293. Baltimore, USA: Penguin Education, penguin.
  18. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex Publishing Corporation, 355 Chestnut Street, Norwood, NJ 07648(hardback: ISBN-0-89391-565-3; paperback: ISBN-0-89391-566-1).