한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육 (The Mathematical Education)

  • 제56권3호
  • /
  • Pages.235-255
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1225-1380(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9633(eISSN)
한국수학교육학회 (Korean Society of Mathematical Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국, 일본, 홍콩, 핀란드, 싱가포르 초등 수학 교과서의 합동과 대칭에 대한 비교·분석

A Comparative Study on Congruence and Symmetry in Elementary Mathematics Textbooks of Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, Finland, and Singapore

  • Pang, JeongSuk (Department of Elementary Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Kim, YuKyung (Sangchon Elementary School)
  • 투고 : 2017.04.05
  • 심사 : 2017.08.16
  • 발행 : 2017.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study compared and contrasted the topics related to congruence and symmetry in the elementary mathematics textbooks series of Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, Finland, and Singapore in three aspects: (a) when to teach, (b) what to teach, and (c) how to teach. Firstly, the results of when to teach showed differences across the countries with a variation of teaching the topics among grades from 3 to 6. Secondly, the results of what to teach revealed subtle but significant differences. Regarding congruence, Korea and Japan deal with congruence in a systematic manner, while Finland tends to address the brief definition of congruence, and Hong Kong and Singapore focus on teaching tessellation which implies congruence. Regarding symmetry, Korea and Japan deal only with a symmetric figure for a line and that for a point, while Hong Kong includes a rotational symmetry and Finland extends further to cover the figures positioned in a symmetry both for a line and for a point. Lastly, the results of how to teach demonstrated that Korea tends to focus on the procedure of drawing both triangles to be congruent and symmetric figures. This implies that we need to consider alternative methods such as using various instructional materials and making an explicit connection among mathematical concepts in teaching congruence and symmetry.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 교육과학기술부 (2011a). 수학 5-1, 서울: 두산동아.(Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2011a). Mathematics textbook 5-1, Seoul: Doosandonga.)
  2. 교육과학기술부 (2011b). 수학 5-2, 서울: 두산동아.(Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2011b). Mathematics textbook 5-2, Seoul: Doosandonga.)
  3. 교육부 (2002a). 수학 5-나, 서울: 대한교과서.(Ministry of Education (2002a). Mathematics 5-나, Seoul: Daehan.)
  4. 교육부 (2002b). 수학 5-나 교사용 지도서, 서울: 대한교과서.(Ministry of Education (2002b). Mathematics 5-나 teaching manual, Seoul: Daehan.)
  5. 교육부 (2015a). 수학 5-2, 서울: 천재교육.(Ministry of Education (2015a). Mathematics 5-2, Seoul: Chunjae.)
  6. 교육부 (2015b). 수학 5-1, 서울: 천재교육.(Ministry of Education (2015b). Mathematics 5-1, Seoul: Chunjae.)
  7. 교육부 (2015c). 수학 6-1, 서울: 천재교육.(Ministry of Education (2015c). Mathematics 6-1, Seoul: Chunjae.)
  8. 교육부 (2015d). 수학과 교육과정, 교육부 고시 제2015-74호 [별책 8].(Ministry of Education (2015d). Mathematics Curriculum, Ministry of education notice 2015-74 [supplement 8].)
  9. 김수희 (2009). 초등학교 6학년 학생들의 평면도형과 입체도형에 대한 오개념 및 원인 분석. 석사학위논문, 한국교원대학교.(Kim S. H. (2009). Analysis of plane figure and solid figure 6 graders' misconceptions and reasons for these conceptions. Master's thesis, Korea National University of Education.)
  10. 김유경, 방정숙 (2017). 초등수학교육 연구동향: 최근 7년간 게재된 국내 학술지 논문을 중심으로, 초등수학교육 20(1), 19-36.(Kim, Y. K. & Pang, J. S. (2017). Research trends in elementary mathematics education: Focused on the papers published in domestic journals during the resent seven years, Education of Primary School Mathematics 20(1), 19-36.)
  11. 방정숙, 이지영, 이상미, 박영은, 김수경, 최인영, 선우진 (2015). 한국.중국.일본.미국의 초등학교 수학과 교육과정 비교.분석: 도형 영역을 중심으로, 학교수학회논문집 18(3), 311-334.(Pang, J. S., Lee, J. Y., Lee, S. M., Park, Y. E., Kim, S. K., Choi, I. Y., & Sunwoo., J. (2015). Comparative analysis school mathematics curricula in Korea, China, Japan, and USA, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society 18(3), 311-334.)
  12. 서동엽 (2016). 우리나라와 싱가포르의 중학교 수학 교육과정 비교, 수학교육학연구 26(3), 443-465.(Seo, D. Y. (2016). A comparative analysis on the secondary school mathematics curriculum in Korea and Singapore, Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 26(3), 443-465.)
  13. 손민경, 류희수 (2014). 우리나라 초등 수학 교과서와 미국 EM 교과서 비교: 도형의 합동을 중심으로, 한국초등수학교육학회지 18(3), 539-555.(Son, M. G. & Ryu, H. S. (2014). A comparison of the textbooks for elementary mathematics between Korea and U.S.A. about congruence of figures, Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea 18(3), 539-555.)
  14. 송미영, 임해미, 최혁준, 박혜영, 손수경 (2013). OECD 국제 학업성취도 평가 연구: PISA 2012 결과보고서, 연구보고 RRE 2013-6-1, 서울: 한국교육과정평가원.(Song, M.Y., Lim, H.M., Choi, H.J., Park. H.Y., & Sun, S.K. (2013). OECD International achievement evaluation: PISA 2012 report, research report RRE 2013-6-1, Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.)
  15. 유재혁, 이대현 (2013). 우리나라와 중국의 초등수학 교과서의 도형영역 비교, 분석, 초등수학교육 16(1), 57-70.(Yu J. H. & Lee, D. H. (2013). Comparative analysis of elementary mathematics textbooks in Korea and China: Focused on the area of geometry, Education of Primary School Mathematics 16(1), 57-70.)
  16. 윤정민 (2009). 우리나라와 홍콩의 중학교 수학 교과서 비교 연구: 기하영역을 중심으로. 석사학위논문, 고려대학교.(Yoon, J. M. (2009). A comparative study of secondary school mathematics textbooks in Korea and Hong Kong: Focused on the area of geometry. Master's thesis, Korea University.)
  17. 장혜원, 강태석, 임미인 (2016). 초등학교 수학과 교육과정과 교과서의 연계 분석, 수학교육학연구 26(1), 121-141.(Chang, H. W., Kang, T. S., & Lim, M. I. (2016). Analysis on connection of curriculum and textbooks in elementary school mathematics: Focus on 5-6 grades, Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 26(1), 121-141.)
  18. 조연옥 (2013). 우리나라와 핀란드 초등수학 교과서의 도형 영역 비교.분석. 석사학위논문, 광주교육대학교.(Cho, Y. O. (2013). Comparative analysis of elementary mathematics textbooks in Korea and Finland: Focused on the area of geometry. Master's thesis, Gwangju National University of Education.)
  19. 최근배, 김해규 (2005). 한국과 미국의 초등수학 교과서(Harcourt Math) 비교 연구: 도형영역을 중심으로, 수학교육 44(2), 179-200.(Choi, K. B. & Kim, H. G. (2005). A comparative study on elementary school mathematics textbooks in Korea and America: Focus on the area of geometry, The Mathematical Education 44(2), 179-200.)
  20. 최병훈, 방정숙, 송근영, 황현미, 구미진, 이성미 (2006). 한국과 싱가포르의 초등 수학 교과서 비교 분석, 학교수학 8(1), 45-68.(Choi, B. H., Pang, J. S., Song, K. Y., Hwang, H. M., Gu, M. J., & Lee, S. M. (2006) A comparative analysis of elementary mathematics textbooks of Korea and Singapore: Focused on the geometry and measurement strand, School Mathematics 8(1), 45-68.)
  21. 하수현, 방정숙, 주미경 (2010). 초등수학교육 연구동향: 최근 5년간 게재된 국내 학술지 논문을 중심으로, 수학교육 49(1), 67-83.(Ha, S. H., Pang, J. S., & Ju, M. K. (2010). Research trends in elementary mathematics education: Focused on the papers published in domestic journals during the recent 5 years, The Mathematical Education 49(1), 67-83.)
  22. 한국과학창의재단(2015). 초등 수학 교과용도서 편찬 결과보고서: 하권, 서울: 경성문화사.(Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity (2015). Final report of compiling elementary mathematics textbooks: Grade bands 5-6, Seoul: GyungSeong.)
  23. 황선욱 외 33명 (2011). 창의중심의 미래형 수학 교과내용 개선 및 교육과정 개정 시안 연구, 한국과학창의재단 연구 보고서 2011-4.(Hwang, S. W. et al. (2011). A study of future mathematics contents improvement focused on the creativity and draft proposal of revised curriculum. Korea Foundation for the Advancement Science and Creativity Research Report 2011-4.)
  24. 新しい算數 6上. (2013a). 東京: 東京書籍.
  25. 新しい算數 5下. (2013b). 東京: 東京書籍.
  26. 新しい算數 5上. (2013c). 東京: 東京書籍.
  27. 新しい算數 3下. (2013d). 東京: 東京書籍.
  28. 新しい算數 4上. (2013e). 東京: 東京書籍.
  29. Common Core State Standards Initiative (2010). Common core standards for mathematics. http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards.pdf
  30. Collars, C., Lee, K. P., Hoe, L. N., Leng, O. B., & Seng, T. C. (2008a). Shaping Maths 5B, Marshall Cavenish Education.
  31. Collars, C., Lee, K. P., Hoe, L. N., Leng, O. B., & Seng, T. C. (2008b). Shaping Maths 4B, Marshall Cavenish Education.
  32. Ilmavirta, R., Koivisto, M., Salonen, M., Sintonen, A. M. & Uus-Leponiemi, T. (2012a). LASKUTAI TO in English 6A, WSOY in Finland.
  33. Ilmavirta, R., Koivisto, M., Salonen, M., Sintonen, A. M. & Uus-Leponiemi, T. (2012b). LASKUTAITO in English 5A, WSOY in Finland.
  34. Ilmavirta, R. Rikala, S., Sintonen, A., Uus-Leponiemi, M., & Uus-Leponiemi, T. (2012). LASKUTAI TO in English 3A, WSOY in Finland.
  35. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA: The Author. 류희찬, 조완영, 이경화, 나귀수, 김남균, 방정숙 공역(2007). 학교수학을 위한 원리와 규준, 서울: 경문사.
  36. Pan Lolyds (2009a). Effective steps to mathematics 5B, Tsuen Wan, N.T.: Author.
  37. Pan Lolyds (2009b). Effective steps to mathematics 4B, Tsuen Wan, N.T.: Author.