DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Intra-tracheal Administration of the Disinfectant Chloromethylisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (CMIT/MIT) in a Mouse Model to Evaluate a Causal Association with Death

마우스의 기도 내 점적을 통한 가습기살균제 CMIT/MIT와 사망 간의 원인적 연관성에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Hayoung (GLP Center & Dept. of Toxicity Assessment, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Chung, Yonghyun (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute) ;
  • Park, Yeongchul (GLP Center & Dept. of Toxicity Assessment, Daegu Catholic University)
  • 김하영 (대구가톨릭대학교 GLP센터 & 화학물질독성평가학과) ;
  • 정용현 (산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 박영철 (대구가톨릭대학교 GLP센터 & 화학물질독성평가학과)
  • Received : 2017.07.20
  • Accepted : 2017.08.10
  • Published : 2017.08.28

Abstract

Objectives: The deaths of Korean victims exposed to the disinfectant CMIT/MIT have remained unresolved. This is mainly due to a lack of concordance between the few available toxicity tests and the abundant epidemiological data, making it difficult to establish a cause-and-effect relationship. Therefore, this study was carried out to investigate any potential associations between CMIT/MIT exposure and death. Methods: Groups of experimental and control C57BL/6 mice were instilled (in the trachea) with chloromethylisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (CMIT/MIT) using a visual instillobot. CMIT/MIT was instilled over a period of three days and eight weeks, respectively, to achieve acute and chronic exposures. A threshold dose-response model was applied for estimating the threshold level as one line of evidence for a causal association between CMIT/MIT and death. Results: An acute exposure of 1.2 mg ai/kg/day of CMIT/MIT was estimated to reflect the threshold for death. The dose-response curve with this threshold showed a very steep slope and a narrow range of CMIT/MIT exposures. The narrow range of CMIT/MIT exposures, in particular, indicated an evident boundary between survival and death, thus implicating a strong causal association. A similar threshold dose-response relationship observed following acute exposure was also seen following chronic exposure to CMIT/MIT. Airborne disinfectant exposure was visible as minimal or mild lung damage with no fibrosis, as shown by histopathological tests. However, many observations are considered to be functional respiratory tract or lung failure due to death, as observed in necropsies of the mice that died due to CMIT/MIT exposures. Conclusions: There are two strong lines of evidence for a causal association between death and CMIT/MIT exposure: 1) The threshold dose-response curve, with a very steep slope and a narrow range of CMIT/MIT exposures showing a visible boundary between survival and death; and 2) many cases of functional respiratory or lung failure.

Keywords

References

  1. Park DU, Ryu SH, Roh HS. Distribution of Health Problems Associated with Humidifier Disinfectant by Year. J Environ Health Sci. 2016; 42(6): 365-374.
  2. Park DU, Ryu SH, Lim HK, Kim SK, Cho YY, Ahn JJ, et al. Types of household humidifier disinfectant and associated risk of lung injury (HDLI) in South Korea. Sci Total Environ. 2017; 596-597: 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.040
  3. A white paper for Humidifier disinfectants-induced health injury. Inspection Committee for lung damage Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Press; 2014. p.44-49.
  4. The Kyunghyang Shinmun. Topic for Humidifier disinfectants-induced symptoms Available: http:// weekly.khan.co.kr/khnm.html?mode=view&code=115&artid=201706191832251&pt=nv [accessed 18 July 2017]
  5. Mondaynewspaper. SK chemical(Co)'s response for Humidifier disinfectant-originated loss. Available: http://www.wolyo.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=44334 [accessed 5 July 2017]
  6. U.S. EPA. Guidelines carcinogen risk assessment. Federal Register 70. EPA/630/P-03/001F. 2005. p.17765-17817.
  7. European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC). Framework for the Integration of Human and Animal Data in Chemical Risk Assessment. Technical Report No. 104, 2009.
  8. Olson H, Betton G, Robinson D, Thomas K, Monro A, Kolaja G, et al. Concordance of the toxicity of pharmaceuticals in humans and in animals. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2000; 32(1): 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/rtph.2000.1399
  9. Hunt DL, Rai SN, Li CS. Summary of Dose- Response Modeling for Developmental Toxicity studies. Dose-Response. 2008; 6(4): 352-368. https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.08-007.Hunt
  10. Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (EU SCCS). OPINION ON the mixture of 5-chloro-2- methylisothiazolin-3(2H)-one and 2-methylisothiazolin- 3(2H)-one. SCCS/1238/9. 2009. p. 25.
  11. Food and Drug Administration (US FDA). Guidance for Industry Estimating the MaximumSafe Starting Dose in Initial Clinical Trials for Therapeutics in Adult Healthy Volunteers. Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2005.
  12. Shamoun DY, Calabrese E, Williams RA, Broughel J. Use of the Linear No-Threshold Model in Chemical and Radiation Exposure. Washington DC: Mercatus center Press; 2016. p.3-33.
  13. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). OECD Guidelines 408 for the testing of chemicals: Repeated Dose 90?day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents. 2008.
  14. Calabrese EJ. Threshold−dose−response model− RIP: 1911 to 2006. BioEssays. 2007; 29: 686-688. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.20590
  15. Ong J, Environmental health risk assessment−Guidelines for assessing human health risk from environmental hazards, Australia; enHEALTH Press; 2012.
  16. Bonita R, Beaglehole R, Kjellstrom T. Basic epidemiology, 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization Press; 2007.
  17. International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS). Guidance document for the use of data in development of chemical-specific adjustment factors (CSAF) for interspecies differences and human variability in dose/concentration response assessment. 2001.
  18. Environmental Protection Agency(U.S. EPA). A Review of the Reference Dose and Reference Concentration Processes, EPA/630/P-02/002F. 2002.
  19. Latta VD, Cecchettini A, Del Ry S, Morales M.A, Bleomycin in the setting of lung fibrosis induction: From biological mechanisms to counteractions. Pharmacol. Res. 2015; 97: 122-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2015.04.012
  20. Williams TM. The mechanism of action of isothiazolone biocides. Power Plant Chemistry. 2007; 9(1): 14-22.
  21. Collier PJ, Ramsey A, Waigh RD, Douglas KT, Austin P, Gilbert P. Chemical reactivity of some isothiazolone biocides. J Appl Bacteriol. 1990; 69(4): 578-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1990.tb01551.x
  22. Basic Module in Bioorganic Chemistry. Reaction of isothiazolinones with glutathione. VAK 02-317-7- 406 WS 2007/2008. Available: http://chem.uft.unibremen.de/ranke/pdf/isothiazolone_GSH_bmb.pdf. [accessed 2008].
  23. Park YC, Lee SD, Cho MH. The Simplest Flowchart Stating the Mechanisms for Organic Xenobiotics- induced Toxicity: Can it Possibly be Accepted as a Central Dogma" for Toxic Mechanisms?. Toxicol. Res. 2014; 30(3): 179-184. https://doi.org/10.5487/TR.2014.30.3.179
  24. Park YC. The molecular and biochemical principles of toxicology. Korea: Korean studies Information Publishing Company Press; 2010.
  25. Ettorre A, Andreassi M, Anselmi C, Neri P, Andreassi L, Stefano AD. Involvement of Oxidative Stress in Apoptosis Induced by a Mixture of Isothiazolinones in Normal Human Keratinocytes. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2003; 121(2): 328-336. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12360.x