Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography (한국측량학회지)

Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography (한국측량학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Predicting Land Use Change Affected by Population Growth by Integrating Logistic Regression, Markov Chain and Cellular Automata Models

  • Nguyen, Van Trung (Faculty of Geomatics and Land Administration, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology) ;
  • Le, Thi Thu Ha (Faculty of Geomatics and Land Administration, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology) ;
  • La, Phu Hien (Faculty of Geomatics and Land Administration, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology)
  • Received : 2017.04.24
  • Accepted : 2017.08.03
  • Published : 2017.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Demographic change was considered to be the most major driver of land use change although there were several interacting factors involved, especially in the developing countries. This paper presents an approach to predict the future land use change using a hybrid model. A hybrid model consisting of logistic regression model, Markov chain (MC), and cellular automata (CA) was designed to improve the performance of the standard logistic regression model. Experiment was conducted in Giao Thuy district, Nam Dinh Province, Vietnam. Demography and socio-economic variables dealing with urban sprawl were used to create a probability surface of spatio-temporal states of built-up land use for the years 2009, 2019, and 2029. The predicted land use maps for the years 2019 and 2029 show substantial urban development in the area, much of which are located in areas sensitive to source protections. It also showed that aquacultural land changes substantially in areas where are in the vicinity of estuary or near the sea dike. There was considerable variation between the communes; notably, communes with higher household density and higher proportion of people in working age have larger increases in aquacultural areas. The results of the analysis can provide valuable information for local planners and policy makers, assisting their efforts in constructing alternative sustainable urban development schemes and environmental management strategies.

Keywords

References

  1. Anselin, L. (1988), Spatial Econometrics. Methods and Models, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
  2. Arsanjani, J.J., Helbich, M., Kainz, W., and Boloorani, A.D. (2013), Integration of logistic regression, Markov chain and cellular automata models to simulate urban expansion, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, Vol. 21, pp. 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2011.12.014
  3. CityMayors (2006), The world's largest cities and urban areas in 2006, http://www.citymayors.com/statistics/ urban_2006_1.html (last date accessed: 15 June 2017).
  4. Congalton, R.G. (1991), A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data, Remote Sensing and Environment, Vol. 37, pp. 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B
  5. Fotheringham, A.S., Brunsdon, C., and Charlton, M. (2000), Quantitative Geography: Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis, Sage Publications, London.
  6. Geist, H.J. and Lambin, E.F. (2002), Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation: Tropical forests are disappearing as the result of many pressures, both local and regional, acting in various combinations in different geographical locations, BioScience, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 143-150. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:PCAUDF]2.0.CO;2
  7. Halls, A.J. (1997), Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: The Role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity, Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland.
  8. Hu, Z. and Lo, C. (2007), Modeling urban growth in Atlanta using logistic regression, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp.667-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2006.11.001
  9. Huang, B., Zhang, L., and Wu, B. (2009), Spatiotemporal analysis of rural-urban land conversion, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 379-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810802119685
  10. Huang, S.W. and Hsieh, H.I. (2012), The study of land use change factors in coastal land subsidence area in Taiwan, International Conference on Environment, Energy and Biotechnology, IPCBEE, 5-6 May, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Vol. 33, pp. 70-74.
  11. Ivan, B. and Kabrda, J. (2007), Changing land use structure and its driving forces in border regions of Czechia, Proceeding of Man in the Landscape Across Fronties - IGU-LUCC Central Europe Conference, August 28 - September 4, Slovenia, Austria, Slovakia and the Czech Republic, pp. 33-47.
  12. Jamal, J.A. (2012), Geosimulation and Multiagent-based Modelling, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  13. Kleinen, J. (2003), Access to natural resources for whom? aquaculture in Nam Dinh, Vietnam. Maritime Studies (MAST), Vol. 2, pp. 39-63.
  14. Lambin, E.F., Turner, B.L., and Geist, H.J. (2001), The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths, Global Environmental Change, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3
  15. McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. (1989), Generalized Linear Models, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
  16. Mertens, B. and Lambin, E.F. (1997), Spatial modelling of deforestation in southern Cameroon, Spatial disaggregation of diverse deforestationprocesses, Applied Geography, Vol. 17, pp. 143-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-6228(97)00032-5
  17. Meyer, W.B. and Turner, B.L. (1992), Human population growth and global land-use/cover change, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic, Vol. 23, pp. 39-61. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.000351
  18. Poelmans, L. and Van Rompaey, A. (2009), Complexity and performance of urban expansion models, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.06.001
  19. Richards, J.F. (1990), Land transformation, In: Turner II, B.L., et al. (eds.), The Earth as Transformed by Human Action, CambridgeUniversity Press, New York, pp. 163-178.
  20. Rozanov, Y.A. (1982), Markov Random Fields, SpringerVerlag, New York.
  21. Schneider, L.C. and Gil Pontius Jr, R. (2001), Modeling land-use change in the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, Vol. 85, pp. 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00189-X
  22. Trimble (2011), eCognition Developer 8.7: User Guide, Trimble Germany GmbH, Trappentreustrasse 1, 80339 Munchen, Germany.
  23. Verburg, P.H., Kok, K., Pontius Jr., R.G., and Veldkamp, A. (2004), Modeling Land-Use and Land-Cover Change, Global Change, In: Lambin E.F., Geist H. (eds.), LandUse and Land-Cover Change. Global Change - The IGBP Series, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 117-135.
  24. Verburg, P.H., Overmars, K.P., Huigen, M.G.A., de Groot, W.T., and Veldkamp, A. (2006), Analysis of the effects of land use change on protected areas in the Philippines, Applied Geography, Vol. 26, pp. 153-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.11.005
  25. Wu, Q., Li, H.Q., Wang, R.-S., Paulussen, J., He, Y., Wang, M., Wang, B.-H., and Wang, Z. (2006), Monitoring and predicting land use change in Beijing using remote sensing and GIS, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 78, pp. 322-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.10.002
  26. Yagoub, M.M. and Al Bizreh, A.A. (2014), Prediction of Land Cover Change Using Markov and Cellular Automata Models: Case of Al-Ain, UAE, 1992-2030, The Indian Society of Remote Sensing, Vol. 42, pp. 665-671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-013-0353-5