Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea (대한인간공학회지)

Ergonomics Society of Korea (대한인간공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ergonomic Design of Necklace Type Wearable Device

  • Lee, Jinsil (Korea University, Department of Industrial Management Engineering) ;
  • Ban, Kimin (Korea University, Department of Industrial Management Engineering) ;
  • Choe, Jaeho (Daejin University, Department of Industrial and Management Engineering) ;
  • Jung, Eui S. (Korea University, Department of Industrial Management Engineering)
  • Received : 2017.04.19
  • Accepted : 2017.05.29
  • Published : 2017.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to identify important physical design variables in designing a necklace type wearable device, and to present design guidelines to maximize comfort that a user feels upon wearing the device. Background: Interests in fitness culture and personal health are on the rise recently. In such a situation, demand for necklace type wearable devices is projected to increase a lot, as the devices enable users to use their hands freely and to enjoy various contents through connection with mobile devices. However, the necklace type wearable device's comfort was assessed to have the lowest comfort in a running situation, where human body moves up and down and left and right more than other devices wearable on other human body parts. Therefore, the usability of a necklace type wearable device was low. In this regard, studies on identification of the variables affecting user comfort upon wearing a necklace type wearable device and on physical design direction maximizing comfort and usability are needed. Method: A pretest and a main test were carried out to draw the direction of necklace type wearable device design. In the pretest, wearing evaluation on the diverse types of devices released in the market was conducted to draw physical design variables of the devices affecting comfort. Furthermore, variables significantly affecting the comfort of a device were selected through an analysis of variance (ANOVA). In the main test, anthropometry was performed, and information on anthropometric items corresponding to the design variables selected in the pretest was acquired. Based on the pretest results and the anthropometric information in the main test, the present study produced design guidelines maximizing the comfort of a necklace type wearable device with regard to major design variables upon dynamic tasks. Results: According to the pretest results, the variables having effects on comfort were the angle of side points, width, and height. Due to interactions between variables, those need to be simultaneously considered upon designing a device. Upon dynamic tasks, the angle of side points and width of a device was designed to be smaller than mean angle of the trapezius muscle and neck width, and thus attachment to human body was high. As height was designed to be larger than mean neck front and rear point width, comfort was higher due to feeling of stability. Conclusion: Because user sensitivity to comfort was high at human body's inflection points, a device needs to be designed for users not to feel high pressure on specific body parts with the device fitting human body shape well. A design considering user's situation is also required in further studies.

Keywords

References

  1. Agarwal, A., Volumetric Deformation: A New Objective Measure to Study Chair Comfort Using 3D Body Scanning Technology [Honors Thesis]. Cornell University, 2006, http://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/3130.
  2. Chae, H., Hong, J., Cho, H., Lee, Y., Park, S., Han, K. and Lee, J., The Development of Usability Evaluation for Wearable Computer: An Investigation of Smart Clothing, Korean Journal of the Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 9(3), pp. 265-272, 2006.
  3. Choi, J., How should we prepare for the super-connected society that is made by smart new people?, 42th KISTEP Forum, http://www.ictconference.kr/sub/pdf/day2/004(%EC%B5%9C%EC%9E%AC%EB%B6%95).pdf (2016)
  4. Gemperle, F., Kasabach, C., Stivoric, J., Bauer, M. and Martin, R., Design for Wearability, Digest of Papers. Second International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Cat. No.98EX215), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp. 116-122, 1998.
  5. Goonetilleke, R.S. and Feizhou, S., A Methodology to Determine the Optimum Seat Depth, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27(4), pp. 207-217, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(00)00051-2
  6. Hong, J.Y., Study on Requirement Investigation and Development of Usability Evaluation for Wearable Computers: Toward Smartwear, Doctoral thesis of Yonsei University, 94(24), 2007.
  7. Jeong, Y.D., Hwang, S.H. and Lee, M.H., The Effects of Molding Conditions on the Surface Gloss of ABS Molding. Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering, 16(4), 110-115, 1999.
  8. Jung, H., An Ergonomic Vehicle Moving Handle Design and Evaluation Method for Grip Comfort, Master's thesis of Pohang University of Science and Technology, 2016.
  9. Kang, D., (A) Study on Form Factor of Heart Rate Measurement Wearable Fitness Tracker in Human Factor Perspective, Master's thesis of Kookmin University, 2015.
  10. Kang, S. and Kim, E., Design Process for Improving the Wearability of Wearable Computers: A Guideline based on the integration of HCI and Fashion Design, the Conference on The HCI Society of Korea, pp. 787-789, 2012.
  11. Kim, D. and Jang, J., A Study on Pattern Development of Men's Slim-fit Dress Shirt: Focus on the 25-35 aged men, Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing Industry, 15(6), pp. 950-962, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2013.15.6.950
  12. Knight, J.F. and Baber, C., A Tool to Assess the Comfort of Wearable Computers, Human Factors, 47(1), pp. 77-91, 2005 Spring. https://doi.org/10.1518/0018720053653875
  13. Knight, J.F., Baber, C., Schwirtz, A. and Bristow, H.W., The Comfort Assessment of Wearable Computers. Proceedings, Sixth International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pp. 65-72, 2002.
  14. Kroemer, K.H.E., Anthropometry, International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors., Edited by Waldemar Karwowski, 2nd Edition, p. 242, 2006.
  15. Luximon, Y., Ball, R. and Justice, L., The 3D Chinese Head and Face Modeling, Computer-Aided Design, 44(1), pp. 40-47, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2011.01.011
  16. Michod, R.E. and Herron, M.D., Cooperation and Conflict during Evolutionary Transitions in Individuality, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 19(5), pp. 1406-1409, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01142.x
  17. Motti, V.G. and Caine, K., Human Factors Considerations in the Design of Wearable Devices, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58th Annual Meeting, pp. 1820-1824, 2014.
  18. Nagae, M. and Suzuki, K., "A neck mounted interface for sensing the swallowing activity based on swallowing sound," 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Boston, MA, pp. 5224-5227, 2011.
  19. Parent, F., Dansereau, J., Lacoste, M. and Aissaoui, R., Evaluation of the New Flexible Contour Backrest for Wheelchairs. J Rehabil Res Dev, 37, pp. 325-333, 2000.
  20. Pearson, E.J., Comfort and its measurement - a literature review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 4(5), pp. 301-310, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483100902980950
  21. Rofouei, M., Sinclairm, M., Bittner, R., Blank, T., Saw, N., DeJean, G. and Heffron, J., A Non-invasive Wearable Neck-Cuff System for Real-Time Sleep Monitoring, 2011 International Conference on Body Sensor Networks, Dallas, TX, pp. 156-161, 2011.
  22. Zulkifli, N., Yusof, F. and Rashid, R., Anthropometric Comparison of Cross-Sectional External Ear between Monozygotic Twin. Ann Forensic Res Anal, 1(2), pp. 1010-1015, 2014.