지질공학 (The Journal of Engineering Geology)

  • 제27권1호
  • /
  • Pages.31-40
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1226-5268(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7169(eISSN)
대한지질공학회 (The Korean Society of Engineering Geology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

강도 정수와 경사도 변화를 활용한 비탈면 해석기법에 따른 안전율 변화에 관한 연구

A Study on Change of Safety Factor according to Slope Analysis Method using Strength Parameters and Slope Change

  • Moon, Hyojong (Department of Civil Engineering, Sangji University) ;
  • Shim, Jeonghoon (Department of Civil Engineering, Sangji University) ;
  • Jeong, Jisu (Department of Civil Engineering, Sangji University) ;
  • Lee, Seungho (Department of Civil Engineering, Sangji University)
  • 투고 : 2017.01.20
  • 심사 : 2017.03.26
  • 발행 : 2017.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

한계평형법에 의한 비탈면 안정성 해석은 활동면을 반복적인 해석 후 임계면을 설정하여 해석을 수행하고, 지반이 균질한 경우에만 적용이 가능하며, 안전율만 산정 할 수 있는 단점이 있다. 그러나 강도감소법을 적용한 해석에서는 수행자가 여러 가지 측면에 대해서 판단하고, 안전율을 산정 할 수 있는 장점 등이 있다. 본 연구에서는 동일한 크기의 비탈면을 대상으로 한계평형해석과 강도감소법을 활용하여 경사도 변화에 따른 두 해석법 간의 안전율 변화 양상과 점착력과 내부마찰각의 변화에 따른 안전율 변화 추이를 비교 분석하였다. 각각의 해석법에 따른 안정해석 분석 결과 지반내 응력, 변위와 변형률 등을 종합적으로 검토할 수 있는 강도감소법이 활용도가 높을 것으로 판단된다.

The slope stability analysis by the limit equilibrium method has the disadvantage that it can be applied only when the analysis is performed by setting the critical plane after analyzing the active surface many times and the soil is uniform and only the safety factor can be calculated. However, the analysis using the strength reduction analysis method has advantages that the engineer can judge various aspects and calculate the safety factor. In this study, the safety factor according to the change of slope and shear strength was compared and analyzed using limit equilibrium analysis and strength reduction method. It is suggested that it is desirable to use the strength reduction method which can synthetically review the stress, displacement, and strain in the soil.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baker, R. and Garber, M., 1977, Variational Approach to Slope Stability, Proc. 9th International conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tokyo, 2, 9-12.
  2. Castillo, E. and Revilla, J., 1977, The calculus of Variations and the Stability of Slopes, Proc. 9th International conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tokyo, 2, 25-30.
  3. Duncan, J. M. and Wright S. G., 1980, The accuracy of equilibrium methods of slope stability analysis, Engineering Geology, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Vol. 16(1/2), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(80)90003-4
  4. Kim, Y. M., 1999, Analysis for effects of slope failure behavior by finite element method, The Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society, 15(5), 19-28.
  5. Korea Expressway Corporation, 2009, Road Design Guideline, 66-68.
  6. Lechman, J. B. and Griffiths, D. V., 2000, Analysis of the Progression of Failure of Earth Slopes by finite elements, Geodenver 2000 ASCE special publication, 250-265.
  7. Lee, B. S. and Md, T. T., 2014, Comparison of Finite Element Method (SRM, SAM) and Limit Equilibrium Method on Slope Stability Analysis, Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society Fall Conference, 278-280.
  8. Lee, D. Y. and Yoo, C. S., 2002, Comparative study between finite element method and limit equilibrium method on slope stability analysis, The Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society, 19(4), 65-74.
  9. Lee, C. K. and Chang, S. M., 1996, A comparative study on slope stability of analysis methods, The Journal of Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 16, 359-368.
  10. Matsui, T. and San, K. C., 1992, Finite element slope stability analysis by shear strength reduction technique, Soil and Foundations, 32(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.32.59
  11. MIDAS IT., 2005, Slope Stability Analysis using Midas GTS, MIDAS Information Technology co., Ltd, 1-2.
  12. MIDAS IT., 2013, Midas GTS NX manual-Analysis reference, MIDAS Information Technology co., Ltd, 224-228.
  13. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2011, construction slope design standard, 29-34.
  14. Moon, H. J., 2016, A Study on the Determination of Slope Safety Factor using Strength Reduction Method, Department of Civil Engineering, Graduate School, Sangji University 34-92 (in Korean with English abstract).
  15. Park, M. C., 2015, Integral Analysis of Slope Behavior according to Progressive Failure and Rainfall, Department of Civil Engineering, Graduate School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, 8-10 (in Korean with English abstract).
  16. Park, Y. J., Chae, Y. S., You, K. H., and Paik, Y. S., 1999, Slope Stability Analysis by Slice Method and Finite Difference Method -A Comparative Study-, The Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society, 15(6), 263-272.
  17. Seoul Metropolitan Government, 2006, Geotechnical Investigation Manual, 1-4.
  18. Zienkiewicz, O. C., Humpheson, C., and Lewis, R. W., 1975, Associated and non-assosiated visco-plasticity and plasticity in soil mechanics, Geotechnique, 25(4), 671-689. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1975.25.4.671