DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Proposing a Simple Radiation Scale for the Public: Radiation Index

  • Cho, Gyuseong (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)) ;
  • Kim, Jong Hyun (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)) ;
  • Park, Tae Soon (Center for Ionizing Radiation, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS)) ;
  • Cho, Kunwoo (Department of Natural Radiation Safety, Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety (KINS))
  • Received : 2016.07.21
  • Accepted : 2016.10.03
  • Published : 2017.06.25

Abstract

A new radiation scale is proposed. With empathy toward the vast majority of people who are not well versed in radiation and related matters, and thus suffering from misunderstanding that breeds unnecessary fear of radiation, the aim of proposing a new radiation scale, radiation index (RAIN), is to put the general public at ease with the concept of radiation. RAIN is defined in dimensionless numbers that relate any specific radiation dose to a properly defined reference level. As RAIN is expressed in plain numbers without an attached scientific unit, the public will feel comfortable with its friendly look, which in turn should help them understand radiation dose levels easily and allay their anxieties about radiation. The expanded awareness and proper understanding of radiation will empower the public to feel that they are not hopeless victims of radiation. The correspondence between RAIN and the specific accumulated dose is established. The equivalence will allow RAIN to serve as a common language of communication for the general public with which they can converse with radiation experts to discuss matters related to radiation safety, radiation diagnosis and therapy, nuclear accidents, and other related matters. Such fruitful dialogues will ultimately enhance public acceptance of radiation and associated technologies.

Keywords

References

  1. R.A. Muller, Physics and Technology for Future Presidents, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2010.
  2. Inducing a misapprehension it the radiation units are not well understood [Internet]. Available from: http://blog.naver.com/kins20/220476507676 (in Korean).
  3. B. Palmer. Sievert, Gray, rem, and rad: why are there so many different ways to measure radiation exposure? [Internet]. Available from: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2011/03/sievert_gray_rem_and_rad.html.
  4. BIPM [Internet]. The International System of Units, Bureau International des Poids et Measure, eighth ed., 2006. Available from: http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/sibrochure/section2-2.html.
  5. Sievert Conversion Factors-Radiation-Dose Equivalent [Internet]. Available from: http://online.unitconverterpro.com/conversion-tables/convert-group/factors.php?cat=radiation--dose-equivalent.
  6. How are different amounts of radiation expressed? [Internet]. Available from: http://www.radiation-scott.org/radsource/2-0.htm.
  7. IAEA General Safety Requirements, GSR Part 3 BSS, 2014.
  8. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Annals of the ICRP, ICRP Publication 103, 2007.
  9. UNSCEAR 2008 Report, Table 1, p. 4.
  10. Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States, NCRP No. 160, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD, 2009.
  11. Radiation in environment, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan, June 29, 2011.
  12. Nuclear Safety Yearbook, Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, 2014, p. 483.
  13. Nuclear Safety Yearbook, Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety, 2014, p. 482.
  14. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ansto.gov.au/NuclearFacts/Whatisradiation/.
  15. CODEX STAN 193, Codex General Standards for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed, 1995.
  16. KINS/GR-300-2, Assessment of Radiation Risk for the Korean Population, 2005.
  17. Federal Guidance Report #11, Table 2.2, 1988. p. 156.
  18. UNSCEAR 2008 Report, Annex A, Table 2, p. 28 and Table B54, p. 137.
  19. UNSCEAR 2008 Report, Annex A, Table C25, p. 168.
  20. UNSCEAR 2008 Report, Annex A, Table D9a, p. 194.
  21. World Health Organization (WHO), WHO Technical Report Series 659, Wholesomeness of irradiated food, WHO, Geneva, 1981, p. 31.
  22. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Technical Report Series 890, High-dose irradiation: wholesomeness of food irradiated with doses above 10 kGy, WHO, Geneva, Part 2, 1999. p. 66.
  23. IAEA General Safety Requirements, No. GSR Part 7, 2015, p. 64.
  24. [Internet]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_Exclusive_Zone.
  25. The Fukushima Daiichi Accident, IAEA, 2015, pp. 85-87.
  26. The Fukushima Daiichi Accident, IAEA, 2015, pp. 142-143.
  27. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Annals of the ICRP, ICRP Publication 60, 1991.
  28. J.E. Turner, Atoms, Radiation and Radiation Protection, third ed., Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2007, p. 466.
  29. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Annals of the ICRP, ICRP Publication 118, 2012.
  30. J.E. Turner, Atoms, Radiation and Radiation Protection, third ed., Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2007, p. 461.

Cited by

  1. Radioactive map of soil at Mount Lebanon province and external dose assessment vol.77, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7302-0
  2. Radon and thoron concentrations inside ancient Egyptian tombs at Saqqara region: Time-resolved and seasonal variation measurements vol.50, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.03.017
  3. STIR-Net: Deep Spatial-Temporal Image Restoration Net for Radiation Reduction in CT Perfusion vol.10, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00647
  4. Investigation of γ-ray attenuation coefficients, effective atomic number and electron density for ZnO/HDPE composite vol.95, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ab9a6e