Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Effect of Co-operation Partners on Innovation Performance :Focused on service industry

협업 파트너가 혁신성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 :서비스산업을 중심으로

  • 전향옥 (대전대학교 융합컨설팅학과) ;
  • 현병환 (대전대학교 융합컨설팅학과)
  • Received : 2017.04.21
  • Accepted : 2017.07.07
  • Published : 2017.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The service industry, as a new growth engine, has become more important in response to changes in the global economy and the industrial environment. Developed countries have promoted the competitiveness of the service industry and have enhanced economic added value. Developing new services requires extensive resources. Therefore, cooperation and network building capabilities with customers, suppliers, and various knowledge creation agencies are critical sources of competitiveness. This study classified the Korean service industry by industrial type in order to enhance innovation competence.The Korean service industry lags behind that of developed countries, and this study analyzed the differences of innovation results according to collaboration partners by the classified industry. By adopting a method that applies industrial classification by Dialogic's innovation pattern, this study showed external cooperation results were different by industrial type. Analysis results revealed that companies cooperate with customers and competitors in many cases; however, product innovation was higher for companies that collaborated with private service companies. In the 'Innovation in services' industry, industry cooperation with universities showed organizational innovation achievements. In the 'Innovation through services' industry, cooperation with customers positively affected marketing innovation achievements. Consequently, the need to foster consulting firms and universities that can professionally collaborate with companies is implied in order to enhance the Korean service industry.

세계 경제 및 산업 환경 변화에 따라 새로운 성장동력 방안으로 서비스산업의 중요성이 점차 높아가고 있다. 선진국에서는 이미 서비스산업의 경쟁력을 강화하여 경제의 고부가가치화를 추진하고 있다. 새로운 서비스를 개발하는 것은 넓은 범위의 자원이 투입되어야 한다. 따라서 고객, 공급자, 그리고 다양한 지식창출기관과의 협력과 네트워크 구축 역량은 기업의 주요한 경쟁력의 원천이 되고 있다. 본 논문은 선진국에 비해 낙후되어 있는 국내 서비스산업의 혁신역량을 제고하기 위해 국내 서비스산업을 산업 유형별로 분류하고, 분류된 산업 별로 협업 파트너에 따라 혁신 성과가 어떻게 다르게 나타나는지를 분석하였다. Dialogic사의 혁신 패턴 별 산업분류를 응용한 방식(홍성민 장선미 2009)을 도입하여 산업 유형별로 외부협력 성과가 다르게 나타남을 보였다. 분석결과 전체 산업에서 기업들은 고객, 경쟁사와 협업하는 경우가 많았으나 민간 서비스업체(컨설팅사나 커머셜랩)와 협업한 경우 제품 혁신성과가 나타났다. '서비스 내 혁신' 산업에서는 대학과 협업이 조직혁신성과로, '서비스를 통한 혁신'산업에서는 고객과의 협업이 마케팅혁신 성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 연구 결과로 국내 서비스산업의 활성화를 위해서는 기업과 전문적으로 협업할 수 있는 컨설팅사나 대학의 전문인력 양성이 필요하다는 시사점이 도출되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Y-C Chang Benefits of Co-operation on Innovative Performance: Empirical Evidence from the UK's Biomedical Sector PREST Discussion Paper, pp. 01-08, 2001.
  2. Pavitt, K, Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory, in: Research Policy 13, pp. 343-373, 1984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
  3. J. T. Hwang, et al., The Impact of Innovative Collaboration on the Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 332-364, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society vol. 13, no. 2, 2010.
  4. J. P. Hong &, E. Y. Kim, Sectoral Patterns of Technological Innovation in Korean Manufacturing Sector, Korea Technology Innovation Society, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 28-50, 2009.
  5. S. M. Hong, A. M. Chang, Characteristics and Activation of Technology Innovation Activity of Knowledge-based Service Sector SMEs by Innovation Patterns, The Korean Small Business Review, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 274-289, 2009.
  6. K. S. Choi, S. W. Kim, A Study on the Cooperative Strategy of Enterprises-Focusing on the Importance Weight of Cooperative Strategy Factors, The Journal of Digital Policy & Management vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 189-201, 2013.
  7. Y. S. Kim, J. Y. Kim, A Study on the Effects of Collaboration with Large Enterprises of SMEs give to Company Performance: Focusing on Moderating Effect of Entrepreneurship and Market Orientation, Corporate Management Research, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 169-190, 2013.
  8. Henry W. Chesbrough, Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, 2003.
  9. James F. Moore Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition Harvard Business Review, pp. 75, 1993.
  10. Edvardsson, et al., Customer integration within service development, A review of methods and an analysis of insitu and exsitu contributions, Technovation, pp. 419-429, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.04.006
  11. Feng et al, The effects of customer and supplier involvement on competitive advantage: An empirical study in China, Industrial Marketing Management, pp. 1384-1394, 2011.
  12. Hong, et al, Knowledge sharing and strategic fit in integrated product development projects: An empirical study, International Journal of Production Economicsx, vol. 132, pp. 186-196, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.04.004
  13. Lau, Supplier and customer involvement on new product performance: Contextual factors and an empirical test from manufacturer perspective, Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 111, pp. 1384-1394, 2011.
  14. Tracey, Michael, A Holostics Approach to New Product Development: New Insights Journal of Supply Chain Management; ProQuest Central Basic, p. 37, 2004.
  15. Knudsen, The relative importance of interfirm relationships and knowledge transfer for new product development success, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 24, pp. 117-138, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00238.x
  16. Hongyi Sun, et al., The Simultaneous Impact of Supplier and Customer involvement on New Product Performance Journal of Technology Management& Innovation, vol. 5, no. 4, 2010.
  17. H. S. Lee, et al, Performance of Collaboration Activities upon SME's Idiosyncrasy, Journal of Internet Computing and Services(JICS), vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 95-105, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7472/jksii.2013.14.6.95
  18. Gem?nden, Hans Georg, Thomas Ritter, and Peter Heydebreck, "Network configuration and innovation success: An empirical analysis in German high-tech industries", International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 449-462, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(96)00026-2
  19. Belderbos, et al, Cooperative R&D and firm performance", Research Policy, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1477-1492, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.003
  20. Zoonky Lee, et al, Open Collaboration Innovation Methodology (OCIM) : A Methodology for New Service Development, The Jounal of Society for e-Business Studies, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 49-70, 2011.
  21. J. S. Park, et al., Policy Tasks for Enhancing Services Innovation Activities, KiET, 2011-601, 2011.
  22. S. G. Hwang, Service Industry Productivity and Innovation, Service Economy Brief, pp. 5-8, 2013.
  23. Gadrey, J., F. Gallouj & O. Weinstein, "New modes of innovation. How services benefit industry", in: International Journal of Service Industry Management, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 4-16, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239510091321
  24. Bart van Ark, et al, Services Innovation Performance and Policy: A Review, Strategy, Research and International Co-operation Department, Directorate-General for Innovation, Ministry of Economic Affairs, The Hague, 2003.