Capillary Flow in Different Cells of Thuja orientalis, Gmelina arborea, Phellodendron amurense

  • Chun, Su Kyoung (Department of Forest Biomaterials Engineering, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2017.04.17
  • Accepted : 2017.07.22
  • Published : 2017.07.25

Abstract

A study was carried out to observe the 1% aqueous safranine solution flow speed in longitudinal and radial directions of softwood Thuja orientalis L., diffuse-porous wood Gmelina arborea Roxb., and ring-porous wood Phellodendron amurense Rupr., Longitudinal flow was considered from bottom to top while the radial flow was considered from bark to pith directions. In radial direction, ray cells and in longitudinal direction tracheids, vessel and wood fiber were considered for the measurement of liquid penetration speed at less than 12% moisture contents(MC). The variation of penetration speed for different species was observed and the reasons behind for this variation were explored. The highest radial penetration depth was found in ray parenchyma of T. orientalis but the lowest one was found in ray parenchyma of P. amurense. The average liquid penetration depth in longitudinal trachied of T. orientalis was found the highest among all the other cells. The penetration depth in fiber of G. arborea was found the lowest among the other longitudinal cells. It was found that cell dimension and also meniscus angle of safranine solution with cell walls were the prime factors for the variation of liquid flow speed in wood. Vessel was found to facilitate prime role in longitudinal penetration for hardwood species. The penetration depth in vessel of G. arborea was found highest among all vessels. Anatomical features like ray parenchyma cell length and diameter, end-wall pits number were found also responsible fluid flow differences. Initially liquid penetration speed was high and the nit gradually decreased in an uneven rate. Liquid flow was captured via video and the penetration depths in those cells were measured. It was found that even in presence of abundant rays in hardwood species, penetration depth of liquid in radial direction of softwood species was found high. Herein the ray length, lumen area, end wall pit diameter determined the radial permeability. On the other hand, vessel and fiber structure affected the longitudinal flow of liquids. Following a go-stop-go cycle, the penetration speed of a liquid decreased over time.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmed, S. A. and Chun S. K. 2009. Observation of liquid permeability related to anatomical characteristics in Samaneasaman.Turk. J. Agric. For. 33(2): 155-163.
  2. Ahmed, S A, Chong SH, Chun SK, Park BS (2006) Ray parenchyma and ray tracheid structure of four Korean pine wood species. J of Korea Furniture Society 17(4): 101-107.
  3. Banks, W. B. 1970. Some factors affecting the permeability of Scots pine and Norway spruce. Wood Science. 5: 10-17.
  4. Bolton, A. J. 1988. A re-examination of some deviations from Darcy's Law in coniferous wood. Wood Science Technology. 22: 311-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353321
  5. Erickson, H. D. and Balatinecz J. J. 1964. Liquid flow paths into wood using polymerization techniques: Douglas-fir and styrene. Forest. Products J. 14: 293-299.
  6. Erickson, H. D. (1970) Permeability of southern pine wood-A review. Wood Science. 2(3): 149-158.
  7. Flynn, K. A. (1995) A review of the permeability, fluid flow, and anatomy of spruce (Picea spp.). Wood Fiber Sci 27: 278-284.
  8. Fujii, T., Lee S. J., Kuroda N., and Suzuki Y. 2001. Conductive function of intervessel pits through a growth ring boundary of Machilusthunbergii. IAWA J. 22(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000264
  9. Hansmann, C., Gindl W., Wimmer R., and Teischinger A. 2002. Permeability of wood: A review. Wood Research. 47: 1-16.
  10. Kamke, F. A. and Lee J. N. 2007. Adhesive penetration in wood- A review. Wood Fiber Science 39: 205-220.
  11. Leal, S., Sousa V. B., and Pereira H. 2007. Radial variation of vessel size and distribution in cork oak wood (Quercus suber L.).Wood Science Technology. 41: 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-006-0112-7
  12. Liese, W. and Bauch J. 1967. On anatomical causes of the refractory behaviour of spruce and Douglas fir. Wood Science 19: 3-14.
  13. Lihra T., Cloutier A., and Zhang S. Y. 2000. Longitudinal and transverse permeability of Balsam fir wetwood and normal heartwood. Wood Fiber Science 32(2): 164-178.
  14. Olsson, T., Megnis M., Varna J., and Lindberg H. 2001. Study of the transverse liquid flow paths in pine and spruce using scanning electron microscopy. J. Wood Science 47: 282-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00766714
  15. Owoyemi, J. M. and Kayode J. O. 2008. Effect of incision on preservative capacity of Gmelina arborea wood. Biotech. 7: 351-353. https://doi.org/10.3923/biotech.2008.351.353
  16. Petty, J. A. (1970) Permeability and structure of the wood of Sitka spruce. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 175: 149-166. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1970.0016
  17. Siau, J. F. 1984. Transport process in wood. Springer, Berlin, New York.
  18. Siau J. F. 1995. Wood: Influence of moisture on physical properties. Dept. of Wood Science and Forest Products, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, pp.227.
  19. Stamm A. J. and Raleigh N. C. 1967. Movement of fluids in wood- part I: flow of fluids in wood. Wood Science Technology 1: 122-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353384
  20. Thomas, R. J. 1976. Anatomical features affecting liquid permeability in three hardwood species. Wood Fiber. 7(4): 256-263.
  21. Trenard, Y. and Gueneau P. 1984. Penetration pathways of liquid gallium in wood seen by scanning electron microscopy. Wood Fiber Science. 16: 403-410.
  22. Virta J., Koponen S., and Absetz I. 2006. Modeling moisture distribution in wooden cladding board as a result of short-term single-sided water soaking. Building Environ. 41: 1593-1599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.06.007
  23. Wardrop, A. B. and Davies G. W. 1961. Morphological factors relating to the penetration of liquids into wood. Holzforschung. 15: 130-141.
  24. Watanabe, U., Imamura Y., and IidaI. 1998. Liquid penetration of precompressed wood VI: Anatomical characterization of pit fractures. J. Wood Science. 44: 158-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00526263
  25. Wheeler E. A. 1982. Ultrastructural characteristics of red maple (AcerrubrumL.) wood. Wood Fiber. 14(1): 43-53.