참고문헌
- Oh CM, Won YJ, Jung KW, et al. Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2013. Cancer Res Treat 2016;48:436-50. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.089
- Kang JK, Kim MS, Jang WI, et al. The clinical utilization of radiation therapy in Korea between 2009 and 2013. Radiat Oncol J 2016;34:88-95. https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2016.01753
- Kidd EA, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, et al. Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in cervical cancer: relationship to prognosis. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:2108-13. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4151
- Inoue T, Morita K. The prognostic significance of number of positive nodes in cervical carcinoma stages IB, IIA, and IIB. Cancer 1990;65:1923-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19900501)65:9<1923::AID-CNCR2820650909>3.0.CO;2-M
- Ariga T, Toita T, Kasuya G, et al. External beam boost irradiation for clinically positive pelvic nodes in patients with uterine cervical cancer. J Radiat Res 2013;54:690-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrs138
- Chan JK, Cheung MK, Huh WK, et al. Therapeutic role of lymph node resection in endometrioid corpus cancer: a study of 12,333 patients. Cancer 2006;107:1823-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22185
- Benedetti Panici P, Basile S, Angioli R. Pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer: the standardization of surgical procedure and its clinical impact. Gynecol Oncol 2009;113:284-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.12.014
- Yang WT, Lam WW, Yu MY, Cheung TH, Metreweli C. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:759-66. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750759
- Horowitz NS, Dehdashti F, Herzog TJ, et al. Prospective evaluation of FDG-PET for detecting pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in uterine corpus cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004;95:546-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.08.009
- Horowitz NS, Dehdashti F, Herzog TJ, et al. Prospective evaluation of FDG-PET for detecting pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in uterine corpus cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004;95:546-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.08.009
- Choi HJ, Roh JW, Seo SS, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study. Cancer 2006;106:914-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21641
- Sironi S, Buda A, Picchio M, et al. Lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical early-stage cervical cancer: detection with integrated FDG PET/CT. Radiology 2006;238:272-9. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2381041799
- Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, Kaji Y, Sugimura K. Accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with uterine cancer. Eur Radiol 2009;19:1529-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1271-8
- Loft A, Berthelsen AK, Roed H, et al. The diagnostic value of PET/CT scanning in patients with cervical cancer: a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol 2007;106:29-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.03.027
- Signorelli M, Guerra L, Montanelli L, et al. Preoperative staging of cervical cancer: is 18-FDG-PET/CT really effective in patients with early stage disease? Gynecol Oncol 2011;123:236-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.07.096
- Chou HH, Chang TC, Yen TC, et al. Low value of [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in primary staging of early-stage cervical cancer before radical hysterectomy. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:123-8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.03.5964
- Driscoll DO, Halpenny D, Johnston C, Sheehy N, Keogan M. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is of limited value in primary staging of early stage cervical cancer. Abdom Imaging 2015;40:127-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0194-x
- Choi HJ, Kim SH, Seo SS, et al. MRI for pretreatment lymph node staging in uterine cervical cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:W538-43. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.0263
- Kim JK, Kim KA, Park BW, Kim N, Cho KS. Feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differentiation of metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes: early experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:714-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21480
- Choi EK, Kim JK, Choi HJ, et al. Node-by-node correlation between MR and PET/CT in patients with uterine cervical cancer: diffusion-weighted imaging versus size-based criteria on T2WI. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2024-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1350-5
- Alavi A, Gupta N, Alberini JL, et al. Positron emission tomography imaging in nonmalignant thoracic disorders. Semin Nucl Med 2002;32:293-321. https://doi.org/10.1053/snuc.2002.127291
- Carter KR, Kotlyarov E. Common causes of false positive F18 FDG PET/CT scans in oncology. Braz Arch Biol Technol 2007;50(SPE):29-35. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132007000600004
- Ames J, Blodgett T, Meltzer C. 18F-FDG uptake in an ovary containing a hemorrhagic corpus luteal cyst: false-positive PET/CT in a patient with cervical carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:1057-9. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.04.1282
- Yildirim Y, Sehirali S, Avci ME, et al. Integrated PET/CT for the evaluation of para-aortic nodal metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer patients with negative conventional CT findings. Gynecol Oncol 2008;108:154-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.09.011
- Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, et al. Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:1652-8. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3372
- Kim SK, Choi HJ, Park SY, et al. Additional value of MR/PET fusion compared with PET/CT in the detection of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 2009;45:2103-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2009.04.006
- Lentz SE, Muderspach LI, Felix JC, Ye W, Groshen S, Amezcua CA. Identification of micrometastases in histologically negative lymph nodes of early-stage cervical cancer patients. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:1204-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000125869.78251.5e
- Yoon MS, Ahn SJ, Nah BS, et al. Metabolic response of lymph nodes immediately after RT is related with survival outcome of patients with pelvic node-positive cervical cancer using consecutive [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;84:e491-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.05.041
피인용 문헌
- Preoperative PET/CT 18 F-FDG Standardized Uptake by Lymph Nodes as a Significant Prognostic Factor in Patients with Colorectal Cancer vol.2018, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5802109
- Significance of elevated SCC-Ag level on tumor recurrence and patient survival in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of uterine cervix following definitive chemoradiotherapy: a multi-institutional vol.30, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e1
- The significance of positron emission and computerized tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose in the post-therapeutic evaluation of patients with uterine carcinoma vol.70, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5937/mp70-17690
- Applied nuclear physics at the new high-energy particle accelerator facilities vol.800, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2019.01.004
- The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Study of Primary Tumor and Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Stage IB1-IIA1 Cervical Cancer vol.44, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0000000000001084
- Is 18 F-FDG PET/CT an Accurate Way to Detect Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.2020, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5439378
- Multimodality Imaging of Uterine Cervical Malignancies vol.215, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.19.21941
- Multiparametric MRI‐Based Radiomics Nomogram for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Early‐Stage Cervical Cancer vol.52, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27101
- Significance of para-aortic lymph node evaluation in patients with FIGO IIIC1 cervical cancer vol.50, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaa091
- Association of pretreatment SUV max of cervix and SCC‐antigen with FIGO2018 stage in Stage IIB-IVB squamous cervical cancer and relationship to prognosis vol.152, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13465