DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대안수자원시설의 음용수 단위생산비용 산출 - 청정지하저수지 경제성에 대한 고찰 -

Unit Water Production Cost Development for Alternative Water Resource Projects - Centered on the Economics of Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) -

  • 투고 : 2017.02.23
  • 심사 : 2017.04.01
  • 발행 : 2017.06.01

초록

본 연구는 대체수자원시설 - 해수담수화, 식수용저수지, 용수전용댐, 지하댐, 그리고 두 개의 간접취수 방법인 강변여과와 청정지하저수지 - 을 고려한 다양한 용수공급시스템별 음용수 단위생산단가를 산정하기 위한 종합적인 방법과 분석결과를 제시한다. 대체수자원시설 건설부터 도수관로를 거쳐 후처리시설을 통한 음용수 생산 지점까지의 모든 건설비용과 운영관리비를 반영하기 위하여 필요한 데이터를 취합하고 개별 총사업비와 운영관리비 추정모델을 개발하였다. 단위생산단가에 영향을 주는 후처리시설과 도수관리의 길이, 그리고 음용수 생산용량에 대한 민감도 분석결과 청정지하저수지가 가장 비용이 작은 대체수자원시설로 분석되었으며 개별 대체수자원시설과 다양한 용수공급시스템별 경제성 정보는 수자원시설 계획 및 예산 분배 의사결정을 지원할 것으로 예상한다.

This paper intends to develop unit water production cost (UWPC) between alternative water resources including desalination, freshwater reservoirs, single-purpose dams, underground dams, and two indirect water in-take technologies - riverbank filtration and aquifer storage and recovery (ASR). The UWPCs of water supply schemes including each alternative are determined based on project cost, and operation and maintenance estimation models, which were developed based on real project cost data. The sensitivity analysis of UWPCs reveals that ASR is the lowest cost option in producing drinkable water among the alternatives, followed by riverbank filtration and underground dam. It is expected that economics related to the finding plays a critical role in supporting water resources planning and budget allocation for central and local water authority in Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bloetscher, F., Sham, C., Danko, J. and Ratick, S. (2014). "Lesson learned from Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) systems in the United States." Journal of Water Resource and Protection. Scientific Research, Vol. 6, No. 17, pp.1603-1629. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2014.617146
  2. Carollo Engineers. (2006). The role of riverbank filtration in reducing the costs of impaired water desalination. Desalination and Water Purification Research and Development Program Report No. 122, U.S. Dept of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation. Available at: https://www.usbr.gov/research/AWT/reportpdfs/report122.pdf. (Accessed : June 23, 2016).
  3. CDM (2007). "Water supply cost estimation study : SFWMD." Available at : http://www.sfwmd.gov/portal/page/portal/xrepository/sfwmd_repository_pdf/water%20supply%20cost%20estimation%20study%202-2007_cdm.pdf. (Accessed : Feb 15, 2015).
  4. DEMEAU (2012). "Development of a catalogue on european MAR sites - Documentation." Available at : http://demeau-fp7.eu/WA1_poster_ISMAR8 (Accessed : Jan 7, 2017).
  5. Department of Environment (DOE) (2015). Water supply system standard operation and management cost and construction cost calculation report (in Korean).
  6. Joo, S. H., Kim, A. S., Moon, J. E., Lee, J. W. and Yoon, H, H. (2010). "Budget estimation for law establishment for job creation." 7th, NABO (in Korean).
  7. Korea Development Institute (KDI) 2001. Guideline for preliminary feasibility study. PIMAC (in Korean).
  8. Korea Development Institute (KDI) 2012. Nakdong river bank filtration project feasibility report. PIMAC (in Korean).
  9. K-Water (2005). Mid- and large scale desalination basic design examination report. DOCT (in Korean).
  10. K-Water (2013). Island and coastal area (first phase) ground water resources secure feasibility study (in Korean).
  11. KWRA (2011). Dam design criteria and explanation (in Korean).
  12. OWS. (2005). A basic investigation report for adopting indirect in-take method. The Office of Waterworks Seoul Metropolitan Government.
  13. Park, J. H. (2011). "Trend of alternative water resources securitization." The Korean Spatial Planning Review, Vol. 357, pp. 102-109.
  14. Pyne, R. D. G. (2014). "The economics of aquifer storage recovery technology." Boletin Geologico y Minero, Vol. 125, No. 2, pp. 219-225.
  15. SKM and CSIRO. (2012). Progress in managed aquifer recharge in Australia. Waterlines Report Series No. 73, National water Commission.
  16. Son, J. E., Shim, Y. G. and Choi, J. H. (2014). "A review on the land ownership for development and use of clean underground storage of water." The Journal of Law and Politics Research, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp.1553-1580. https://doi.org/10.17926/kaolp.2014.14.4.1553