Journal of Chest Surgery

  • 제50권4호
  • /
  • Pages.275-280
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2765-1606(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-1614(eISSN)
대한심장혈관흉부외과학회 (The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

No Adverse Outcomes of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Resection of cT2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer during the Learning Curve Period

  • Bilgi, Zeynep (Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kars Harakani State Hospital) ;
  • Batirel, Hasan Fevzi (Department of Thoracic Surgery, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine) ;
  • Yildizeli, Bedrettin (Department of Thoracic Surgery, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine) ;
  • Bostanci, Korkut (Department of Thoracic Surgery, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine) ;
  • Lacin, Tunc (Department of Thoracic Surgery, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine) ;
  • Yuksel, Mustafa (Department of Thoracic Surgery, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2016.12.12
  • 심사 : 2017.03.29
  • 발행 : 2017.08.05
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) anatomic lung resections are gradually becoming the standard surgical approach in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The technique is being applied in cases of larger tumors depending on the experience of the surgical team. The objective of this study was to compare early surgical and survival outcomes in patients undergoing anatomic pulmonary resections using VATS and thoracotomy techniques for clinical T2 NSCLC during the adaptation period of the surgical team to the VATS approach. Methods: The data of all patients who underwent anatomic pulmonary resection for NSCLC using VATS and open techniques since April 2012 were recorded to create a prospective lung cancer database. Clinical T2 NSCLC patients who underwent VATS anatomic lung resection were identified and compared with cT2 patients who underwent open resection. Results: Between April 2012 and August 2014, 269 anatomical resections for NSCLC were performed (80 VATS and 189 thoracotomy). Thirty-four VATS patients who had clinical T2 disease were identified and stage-matched to thoracotomy patients. The average tumor diameter was comparable ($34.2{\pm}11.1{\times}29.8{\pm}10.1mm$ vs. $32.3{\pm}9.8{\times}32.5{\pm}12.2mm$, p=0.4). Major complications were higher in the thoracotomy group (n=0 vs. n=5, p=0.053). There was no 30-day mortality, and the 2-year survival rate was 91% for VATS and 82% for thoracotomy patients (p=0.4). Conclusion: VATS anatomic resections in clinical T2 NSCLC tumors are safe and have perioperative and pathologic outcomes similar to those of thoracotomy, while remaining within the learning curve.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Paul S, Altorki NK, Sheng S, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:366-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.08.026
  2. Whitson BA, Groth SS, Duval SJ, Swanson SJ, Maddaus MA. Surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:2008-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.009
  3. Klapper J, D'Amico TA. VATS versus open surgery for lung cancer resection: moving toward a minimally invasive approach. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2015;13:162-4. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2015.0023
  4. Whitson BA, Andrade RS, Boettcher A, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is more favorable than thoracotomy for resection of clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1965-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.01.049
  5. Shimizu K, Yoshida J, Nagai K, et al. Visceral pleural invasion is an invasive and aggressive indicator of non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:160-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.11.021
  6. Dziedzic D, Orlowski T. The role of VATS in lung cancer surgery: current status and prospects for development. Minim Invasive Surg 2015;2015:938430.
  7. Melfi FM, Mussi A. Robotically assisted lobectomy: learning curve and complications. Thorac Surg Clin 2008;18:289-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thorsurg.2008.06.001
  8. Catarino PA, Goldstraw P. The future in diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: surgical techniques. Respiration 2006;73:717-32. https://doi.org/10.1159/000095901
  9. Yu WS, Lee CY, Lee S, Kim DJ, Chung KY. Trainees can safely learn video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy despite limited experience in open lobectomy. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015;48:105-11. https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2015.48.2.105
  10. Licht PB, Jorgensen OD, Ladegaard L, Jakobsen E. A national study of nodal upstaging after thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy for clinical stage I lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:943-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.011
  11. Zhou H, Tapias LF, Gaissert HA, et al. Lymph node assessment and impact on survival in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy or segmentectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2015;100:910-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.034
  12. Bach PB, Cramer LD, Schrag D, Downey RJ, Gelfand SE, Begg CB. The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;345:181-8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200107193450306

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of Epidural Anesthesia on the Immune Function of Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer vol.14, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3923/ijp.2018.826.834