Yonsei Cancer Center QA Set을 이용한 6DoF Couch의 이동 정확성 검증

Verify Image-Guided Shifts for 6DoF Couch using Yonsei Cancer Center QA Set

  • 정동민 (연세암병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 박효국 (연세암병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 윤종원 (연세암병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 이상규 (연세암병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 김주호 (연세암병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 조정희 (연세암병원 방사선종양학과)
  • Jung, Dongmin (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center) ;
  • Park, Hyokuk (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center) ;
  • Yoon, Jongwon (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center) ;
  • Lee, Sangkyu (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center) ;
  • Kim, Jooho (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center) ;
  • Cho, Jeonghee (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center)
  • 발행 : 2017.06.30

초록

목 적: 영상유도를 통한 6DoF Couch의 이동 정확성의 검증을 위해 QA Set을 제작하였고, 그 유용성을 평가하였다. 대상 및 방법: 6DoF Couch와 CBCT가 설치된 두 대의 선형가속기를 대상으로 하였으며, 자체 제작한 YCC QA Set을 이용하여 수평수직(Translation; TX, TY, TZ)과 회전(Rotation, Pitch; RX, Roll; RY, Yaw; RZ) 여섯방향의 Off-Set 값이 설정된 Penta-Guide Phantom의 CBCT영상을 각각 15회에 걸쳐 획득하였다. 이를 통해 기준영상(Reference Image)과 보정영상(Registration Image)을 비교하였으며, 보정된 6DoF Couch의 이동정확성을 실측하여 오차를 분석하였다. 결 과: 기준영상과 보정영상의 Air Cavity에 해당하는 Pixel들은 모두 30에서 66 사이에 포함되어 보정정확도가 높게 나타났다. 6DoF Couch의 Off-set의 보정 결과 값과 실측치의 비교에서 수평수직방향의 오차는 TX방향은 $0.25{\pm}.18mm$ TY방향은 $0.25{\pm}.25mm$ TZ방향에서 $0.36{\pm}.2mm$로 나타났다. 그리고 회전방향의 오차는 RX방향은 $0.18{\pm}.08^{\circ}$ RY방향은 $0.26{\pm}.09^{\circ}$ RZ방향에서 $0.11{\pm}.08^{\circ}$로서, 임의의 값에 대하여 정확하게 보정되었다. 결 론: YCC QA Set을 이용해 매우 간단한 방법으로 6DoF Couch의 수평수직방향뿐 아니라 회전방향의 오차에 대한 검증을 할 수 있었으며, 이는 6DoF Couch의 Daily IGRT QA를 수행함에 있어서 유용할 것이라 사료된다.

Purpose: A QA Set was established to verify the movement accuracy of image-guided 6DoF Couch and to evaluate its usefulness. Materials and Methods: Two sets of linear accelerators equipped with 6DoF Couch and CBCT were used. Using the established QA Set, each CBCT image was obtained over 15 times through the Penta-Guide Phantom installed with off-set shift values along six translational (Translation; TX, TY, TZ) and rotational (Rotation, Pitch; RX, Roll; RY, Yaw; RZ) directions. Using this method, we compared the reference image and the registration image, and we analyzed the error calculated by measuring the positional accuracy of the modified 6DoF Couch. Results: The Air Cavity corresponding to the Pixel of the reference image and the registration image were all contained between 30 and 66, and the revealing high registration accuracy. Error between the modified off-set value of 6DoF Couch and the measured value along translational directions were $0.25{\pm}0.18mm$ in the TX direction, $0.25{\pm}0.25mm$ in the TY direction, and $0.36{\pm}0.2mm$ in the TZ direction. Misalignments along the rotational axis were $0.18{\pm}0.08^{\circ}$ in the RX direction, $0.26{\pm}0.09^{\circ}$ in the RY direction, and $0.11{\pm}0.08^{\circ}$ in the RZ direction, it was corrected precisely for any value. Conclusion: Using the YCC QA Set, we were able to verify the error of 6DoF Couch along both the translational and rotational directions in a very simple method. This system would be useful in performing Daily IGRT QA of 6DoF Couch.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Jennifer De Los Santos, Richard Popple, Nzhde Agazaryan, et al.: Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) Technologies for Radiation Therapy Localization and Delivery. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;87(1):33-45 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.02.021
  2. C. Clifton Ling, Ellen Yorke, Zvi Fuks: From IMRT to IGRT: Frontierland or Neverland?. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2006;78:119-122 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2005.12.005
  3. Thomas Bortfeld: IMRT: a review and preview. Phys. Med. Biol. 2006;51:R363-R379 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/13/R21
  4. A Brahme, J-E. Ross, I. Lax : Solution of an integral equation encountered in rotation therapy. Phys. Med. Biol. 1982;27(10):1221-1229 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/27/10/002
  5. Christoph Oehler, Stephanie Lang, Peter Dimmerling, et al.: PTV margin definition In hypofractionated IGRT of localized prostate cancer using cone beam CT and orthogonal image pairs with fiducial markers. Radiation Oncology. 2014:9-229
  6. BS The, C Bloch, M Galli-Guevara, L Doh, et al.: The treatment of primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with image-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2007;3(1):6 https://doi.org/10.2349/biij.3.1.e6
  7. Akihiro Takemura, Shinichi Ueda, Kimiya Noto, et al.: Comparison of the Motion Accuracy of a Six Degrees of Freedom Radiotherapy Couch with and without Weights. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, 2013;2:69-75 https://doi.org/10.4236/ijmpcero.2013.23010
  8. Daniel Schmidhalter, M. K. Fix, M. Wyss, et al.: Evaluation of a new six degrees of freedom couch for radiation therapy. Med. Phys. 2013;40:111710 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4823789
  9. C Y Shang, T R Williams, M Kasper: Clinical Efficacy of Using KV-CBCT Imaging Guided 6D Robotic Couch in Lung SBRT. Med. Phys. 2011;38:3473
  10. Takakura, T Mizowaki, M Nakata, et al.: The geometric accuracy of frameless stereotactic radiosurgery using a 6D robotic couch system. Phys. Med. Biol. 2010;55:1-10 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/1/001
  11. Thierry Gevaert, Dirk Verellen, Benedikt Engels, Tom Depuydt, et al. : Clinical evaluation of a robotic 6-degree of freedom treatment couch for frameless radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83(1):467-474 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.048
  12. Sewuk Jang, Kangchul cho, Sangkyu Lee, et al.: Evaluation of the accuracy of the HexaPOD evo RT system using Non-coplanar beams in lung cancer. The journal of the korean society for radiotherapeutic technology. 2015;27(2): 115-122
  13. Eric E. Klein, Joseph Hanley, John Bayouth, et al.: Task Group 142 report: Quality assurance of medical acceleratorsa). Med. Phys. 2009;36(9):4197-4212 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3190392
  14. Paul Scovanner, Saad Ali, Mubarak Shah: A 3-Dimensional SIFT Descriptor and its Application to Action Recognition. MM'2007;Sep:23-28
  15. KR MATTHEWS: ELEMENTARY LINEAR ALGEBRA, University of Queensland. 1991;8:149-187
  16. J R Sykes, R Lindsay, C J Dean, et al.: Measurement of cone beam CT coincidence with megavoltage isocentre and image sharpness using the QUASARTM Penta-Guide phantom. Phys. Med. Biol. 2008;53:5275-5293 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/19/002
  17. He Wang, Almon Shiu, Congjun Wang, et al.: DOSIMETRIC EFFECT OF TRANSLATIONAL AND ROTATIONAL ERRORS FOR PATIENTS UNDERGOING IMAGE-GUIDED STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY FOR SPINAL METASTASES. Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys. 2008;71(4):1261-1271 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.074
  18. Dennis Yuen-Kan Ngar, Michael Lok-Man Cheung, Michael Koon-Ming Kam, et al.: A novel compound 6D-offset simulating phantom and quality assurance program for stereotactic image-guided radiation therapy system. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS. 2013;14(6):100-116 https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v14i6.4297