References
- Caulfield RH, Niranjan NS. Innovative techniques: a novel technique for intraoperative estimation of breast implant size in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008;32:126-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9045-2
- Hidalgo DA, Spector JA. Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;133:567e-583e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000033
- Khoo LS, Radwanski HN, Senna-Fernandes V, et al. Does the use of intraoperative breast sizers increase complication rates in primary breast augmentation? A retrospective analysis of 416 consecutive cases in a single institution. Plast Surg Int 2016;2016:6584810.
- Holmes WJ, Timmons MJ, Kauser S. Techniques used by United Kingdom consultant plastic surgeons to select implant size for primary breast augmentation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015;68:1364-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.06.002
Cited by
- Motiva Ergonomix Round SilkSurface Silicone Breast Implants : Outcome Analysis of 100 Primary Breast Augmentations over 3 Years and Technical Considerations vol.141, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000004367
- Reply: Motiva Ergonomix Round SilkSurface Silicone Breast Implants: The Tale of Goldilocks: Never Be Afraid of Exploring Unknown Territory vol.143, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000005147
- Comments on “Preliminary 3-Year Evaluation of Experience With SilkSurface and VelvetSurface Motiva Silicone Breast Implants: A Single-Center Experience With 5813 Consecutive Breast Augmentation vol.39, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy203