DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Vessel Remodeling after Intima-to-Intima Contact Anastomosis

  • Yeo, Hyeonjung (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Hyodong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Daegu Fatima Hospital) ;
  • Son, Daegu (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keimyung University School of Medicine) ;
  • Hong, Changbae (College of Physical Education, Keimyung University) ;
  • Kwon, Sun Young (Department of Pathology, Keimyung University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2016.08.25
  • Accepted : 2017.01.02
  • Published : 2017.03.15

Abstract

Background Intima-to-intima microanastomotic vascular remodeling was explored, utilizing a polylactide-caprolactone absorbable vein coupler model (PAVCM), which was designed to simulate a non-absorbable counterpart system with the sole exception of being absorbable. Methods Six New Zealand white rabbits were used. After transection of the jugular vein, 2 PAVCMs were placed, 1 at each transected end. The stumps were slipped through the PAVCMs, and the venous wall was everted $90^{\circ}$ to achieve intima-to-intima contact. Reanastomosis of the transected jugular vein was performed bilaterally in 3 rabbits. In the other 3 rabbits, the jugular vein (20 mm) harvested from one side was interpositionally grafted to the jugular vein on the opposite side to ease the anastomotic tension. Patency testing, ultrasonography, and histologic assessments were conducted postoperatively at weeks 2, 4, 12, 16, 22, and 26. Results All anastomotic sites were patent, without stenosis, occlusion, or dilatation. In the histologic sections, immature endothelial regeneration was observed at week 2, which was completed by week 4. Regeneration of the tunica media was noted at week 12. Between week 22 and week 26, the tunica media fully regenerated and the coupler dissipated entirely. Conclusions Despite the absence of a coupler to act as an anastomotic buttress, the structure and function of all the vessels appeared normal, even histologically. These outcomes are true milestones in the development of an absorbable vein coupler.

Keywords

References

  1. Nakayama K, Yamamoto K, Tamiya T. A new simple apparatus for anastomosis of small vessels: preliminary report. J Int Coll Surg 1962;38:12-26.
  2. Ostrup LT, Berggren A. The UNILINK instrument system for fast and safe microvascular anastomosis. Ann Plast Surg 1986;17:521-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198612000-00014
  3. Berggren A, Ostrup LT, Lidman D. Mechanical anastomosis of small arteries and veins with the unilink apparatus: a histologic and scanning electron microscopic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;80:274-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198708000-00020
  4. Ardehali B, Morritt AN, Jain A. Systematic review: anastomotic microvascular device. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014;67:752-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.01.038
  5. Yap LH, Constantinides J, Butler CE. Venous thrombosis in coupled versus sutured microvascular anastomoses. Ann Plast Surg 2006;57:666-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000229958.57126.21
  6. Denk MJ, Longaker MT, Basner AL, et al. Microsurgical reconstruction of the lower extremity using the 3M microvascular coupling device in venous anastomoses. Ann Plast Surg 1995;35:601-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199512000-00008
  7. Kubo T, Kitamura N, Onoda M, et al. Exposure of a microvascular anastomotic coupler in head and neck reconstruction: a case report. Eplasty 2014;14:e18.
  8. Zomerlei TA, Komorowska-Timek E. Venous coupler migration: a near miss. Microsurgery 2014;34:331-2. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.22231
  9. Hong C, Yeo H, Son D. Vascular remodeling with a microvascular anastomotic coupler system: a case report. Arch Reconstr Microsurg 2015;24:20-3. https://doi.org/10.15596/ARMS.2015.24.1.20
  10. Kind GM, Buncke GM, Buncke HJ. Foreign-body sensation following 3M coupler use in the hand. Ann Plast Surg 1996;37:418-21. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199610000-00013
  11. Bertleff MJ, Meek MF, Nicolai JP. A prospective clinical evaluation of biodegradable neurolac nerve guides for sensory nerve repair in the hand. J Hand Surg Am 2005;30: 513-8.
  12. Den Dunnen WF, Meek MF, Robinson PH, et al. Peripheral nerve regeneration through P(DLLA-epsilon-CL) nerve guides. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1998;9:811-4. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008987910224
  13. Morecraft R, Blair WF, Chang L. Histopathology of microvenous repair. Microsurgery 1985;6:219-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.1920060406
  14. Chow SP. The histopathology of microvascular anastomosis: a study of the incidence of various tissue changes. Microsurgery 1983;4:5-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.1920040106
  15. Daniel RK, Lidman D. The normal healing process of microvascular anastomoses. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;15:103-10. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844318109103422
  16. Li YN, Wood MB. End-to-side-anastomosis in the dog using the 3M precise microvascular anastomotic system: a comparative study. J Reconstr Microsurg 1991;7:345-50. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1006795
  17. Ragnarsson R, Berggren A, Ostrup LT. Long term evaluation of the unilink anastomotic system: a study with light and scanning electron microscopy. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1992;26:167-71. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844319209016008
  18. Blair WF, Morecraft RJ, Steyers CM, et al. A microvascular anastomotic device: Part II. A histologic study in arteries and veins. Microsurgery 1989;10:29-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.1920100107
  19. Daniel RK, Olding M. An absorbable anastomotic device for microvascular surgery: experimental studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;74:329-36. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198409000-00001
  20. Qu W, Muneshige H, Ikuta Y. An absorbable pinned-ring device for microvascular anastomosis of vein grafts: exprerimental stuies. Microsurgery 1999;19:128-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2752(1999)19:3<128::AID-MICR2>3.0.CO;2-0
  21. Joji S, Muneshige H, Ikuta Y. Experimental study of mechanical microvascular anastomosis with new biodegradable ring device. Br J Plast Surg 1999;52:559-64. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.1999.3131
  22. Maxwell GP, Szabo Z, Buncke HJ Jr. Aneurysms after microvascular anastomoses: incidence and pathogenesis in experimental animals. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979;63:824-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197963060-00008
  23. Lykoudis EG, Papanikolaou GE, Katsikeris NF. Microvascular anastomotic aneurysms in the clinical setting: case report and review of the literature. Microsurgery 2009;29: 293-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20612
  24. Ceulemans P, Van Landuyt K, Hamdi M, et al. Complete survival of a free flap after early pseudoaneurysm formation and pedicle thrombosis. Ann Plast Surg 2001;47:332-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-200109000-00019
  25. Borja-Morant A, Navarro-Vila C, Cuesta-Gil M, et al. Experimental evaluation and clinical use in the head and neck of a 3M/Precise microvascular anastomotic device. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1995;23:305-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(05)80161-1

Cited by

  1. A Biodegradable Vascular Coupling Device for End-to-End Anastomosis vol.38, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-017-0348-8
  2. New Absorbable Microvascular Anastomotic Devices Representing a Modified Sleeve Technique: Evaluation of Two Types of Source Material and Design vol.9, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47499-5
  3. Fabrication of a Novel Absorbable Vascular Anastomosis Device and Testing in a Pig Liver Transplantation Model vol.47, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02212-5