DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Suggested Shiny-Sigma method suitable for the shop floor

현장에 적합한 샤이니-시그마 기법 제안

  • Kim, Kang Hee (aSSIST: a Seoul School of Integrated Sciences & Technologies) ;
  • Ree, Sang Bok (Dept. of Industrial Management System Engineering, Seokyeong University)
  • 김강희 (서울과학종합대학원대학교) ;
  • 이상복 (서경대학교 산업경영시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2017.04.24
  • Accepted : 2017.05.16
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study proposes a Shiny-Sigma Methods that combines the advantages of Six Sigma method and Shainin method in order to solve field defect. Each technique has advantages and disadvantages. Methods: This study proposed Shiny-Sigma by combining Six Sigma has the logical advantage of the problem solving road map and Shiny has the merits of finding the root problem from the defective phenomenon. The Six Sigma method has the disadvantage that it is difficult to solve if the number of data is small, but the Shiny method has the advantage of finding the root cause with a small number of data. Results: As a result of applying Shiny-Sigma method to the field, it has advantages of solving the problem easily and quickly than the existing Six Sigma method. It does not require a lot of statistical knowledge, which helps field workers to use it. Based on these successes L Co. company has obtained the effect of improving the production quality by applying the Shiny-Sigma method. Conclusion: The Shiny-Sigma method proved to be suitable for the production site as a result of field application. It is suitable for field workers with low statistical knowledge and is suitable for field where data is difficult to obtain. This method is not a method to solve all the problems because there are problems that can be solved according to the field problems. We hope that this method will spread to many industrial sites and this method will have a great effect on the improvement of field production quality.

Keywords

References

  1. Andrew Thomas, and Richard Barton. 2005. Developing an SME based Six Sigma strategy.
  2. Andrew Thomas. 2008. Applying lean Six Sigma in a small engineering company - a model for change.
  3. Bong Choi, Namho Chung, Soon Jae Kwon, and Kun Chang Lee. 2007. Driving Strategy for the Successful Six Sigma Innovation by Industrial Classification.
  4. Chong man Kim, Uk Jung, Jun-Hyeok Seo, and Sung Min Bae. 2016. Literature Review on the Quality Innovation in KSQM for 50 Years.
  5. Gap Du Lee, Hyo Gen Park. 2014. The Effect of Six Sigma Success Factors on Knowledge Creation and Business Performance.
  6. Hwang Young Jea, Kwon Hyuck Moo, Hong Sung Hoon, and Lee Min Koo. 2006. A Six Sigma Model for Small and Medium Sized Companies and Case Studies.
  7. Jae Hong Yoon. 2013. The Effects of Correct Implementation of Six Sigma Practices on Customer Focus Performance. Quality Performance and Business Performance.
  8. Jan Kosina. 2015. Shiny Methodology : An Alternative or an Effective Complement to Six Sigma?
  9. K. R. Bhote, A. K. Bhote., 2000. World class quality using design of experiments to make it happen - II $edition{\mid}{\mid}$, AMACOM.
  10. Mun, J. O. 2004. A Study of Method of Lean Six Sigma Deployment.
  11. Mun, J. O. 2015. A Study on the Effective Development of Lean Six Sigma Activities for Management Innovation
  12. Mun, J. O., and Jang, J. S. 2009. In Existing Six Sigma Lean Productive Methods Grafting one Lean Six Sigma Propulsion Methodologies.
  13. Mun, JeOk, Yoon, SungPil. 2016. Literature Review of Key Success Factors of Management Innovation Actions in Domestic - Focused on Six Sigma, TQM, Lean Six Sigma, ERP, TPM, BPR, Project Management, System Engineering.
  14. Raunak Gupta, P. L. Verma, Ashish Manoria, and Lokesh Bajpai. 2016. SIMPLIFYING Six Sigma Methodology USING Shiny Methodology D.O.E.
  15. Sang Bok Ree, Quality Story. Iretech. 2004
  16. Seng Ho Lee, Sang Bok Ree, Hyung Kyu Lee, and Se Yong Oh. 2001. A Comparative Study of Experimental Planning Methods for Quality Improvement.
  17. Srinivasan Balan. 2015. Multi-response optimisation using Grey relational analysis and Shiny Methodology design of experiment.
  18. Sung Hoon Hong, Jae Woong Song. 2003. A Comparative Study of Six Sigma Green Belt Training Programs.
  19. Wikipidia. "Dorian Shainin." Last modified on 18 March 2017. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorian_shainin
  20. Yeon Ki Park, Cheol Hwang Yoon, and Yeon Ho Ryu. 2006. Current Situation, Issue and Development Direction of Six Sigma Innovation in Korea.