Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Developing a Student Evaluation Instrument for College Teaching

대학강의 평가도구 개발

  • Received : 2017.03.17
  • Accepted : 2017.06.09
  • Published : 2017.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In using lecture evaluation methods to improve the quality of education, most universities need to reflect the changes in the educational environment. The transformation of university education into a mixed learning environment blending face-to-face education and online education necessitates the development of appropriate lecture evaluation items. For this purpose, we analyzed the items and the factor analysis for the students of C university in Daejeon. The primary data were carried out with 47 measurement items in 10 domains, such as planning and preparation of lectures, which were found through previous research analysis. Secondary data were validated by using the items confirmed through analysis of preliminary test data. The study results showed that 20 items including six domains such as planning and preparation of lectures, learning materials, learning tasks, instruction media, online course test and grades were derived. These study results suggest that universities lectures should be evaluated to ensure improvement.

각 대학에서는 교육의 질을 개선하기 위해 여러 형태의 강의평가를 실시하고 있다. 대학강의 평가가 수업개선에 도움이 되기 위해서는 교육환경의 변화를 반영할 필요가 있다. 대학교육이 면대면 교육과 온라인 교육을 병행하는 혼합학습 환경으로 변환함에 따라 이를 반영한 타당한 강의평가 문항 개발이 요구되어 본 연구를 수행하게 되었다. 이를 위해 대전의 C대학 재학생을 대상으로 예비검사와 본검사의 2차례에 걸친 검사문항 분석과 요인분석을 통해 이루어졌다. 1차 자료는 선행연구 분석을 통해 밝혀진 강의계획과 준비 등 10개 영역에 47문항으로 이루어진 측정도구를 가지고 수행되었다. 2차 자료는 예비검사 자료 분석을 통해 확정한 문항을 사용하여 본 검사의 타당화 과정을 수행하였다. 연구 결과 강의계획과 준비, 학습자료, 학습과제, 교수매체, 온라인 강의, 시험과 성적 등 6개 영역의 20개 문항이 도출되었다. 이 연구 결과는 대학의 강의 개선을 위해서는 다양한 대학 교육 환경을 반영한 강의평가가 이루어져야 함을 시사하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. I. Han, "Research on Student Ratings of University Teaching: Analysis of Determinants related to Professor, Student, and Class", The Journal of Educational Administration, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 247-266, 2001.
  2. J. C. Ory, "Changes in evaluating teaching in higher education", Theory into Practice, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 30-36, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849109543473
  3. H. K. Wachtel, "Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness : A brief review", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 191-211, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293980230207
  4. S. S. Kim, "Optimizing measurement conditions for students' evaluation of e-learning system using generalizability study", Journal of Education evaluation, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 305-322, 2006.
  5. J. G. Lee, "A Study on the Improvement of a Lecture Evaluation Questionnaire in the University", Korean Journal of General Education, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 247-274, 2013.
  6. H. H. Jeong, "A study on students awareness of course evaluation: focusing on integrity of responsive attitudes and satisfaction", The Journal Of Educational Methodology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 443-470, 2016.
  7. K. Bain, What the best college teachers do. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.
  8. S. I. Han, H. J. Kim, J. Y. Lee, "A Comprehensive Study of Korean Students' Evaluations of University Teaching", The Journal of Educational Administration, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 379-403, 2005.
  9. H. W. Marsh, J. U. Overall, "Validity of Student's Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness: Cognitive and Affective Criteria", Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 468-475, 1980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.72.4.468
  10. H. W. Marsh, "SEEQ: A reliable, valid, and useful instrument for collecting student's evaluation of university teaching", British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, pp. 77-95, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1982.tb02505.x
  11. H. W. Marsh, "Students' evaluation of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research", International Journal of Educational Research, 11, pp. 253-388, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2
  12. H. Narang, "Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness. A Proposal", ERIC, ED349906, 1992.
  13. J. A. Centra, "The use of the teaching portfolio and student valuations for summative evaluation", Journal of High Education, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 17-24. 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2943778
  14. U. H. Chang, "Evaluation System of Instruction in College : Practical Problems and Improving Practices", Education Review, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 91-103, 1993.
  15. Y. W. Choi, Constructing Items for Course Evaluation. Graduate School, Ewha Womans University, Master's Thesis, 1994.
  16. D. Cheung, "Developing a student evaluation instrument for distance teaching", Distance Education, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 23-42, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791980190104
  17. M. S. Cho, "Operation Condition of Cyber Lectures and Students' Estimation in OCU and Cheju University", Social Development Review, 18, pp. 219-263, 2003.
  18. J. H. Im, & I. S. Jeong, "A Study on the Student Satisfaction of Web-Based Instruction", Journal of Educational Broadcasting, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 151-175, 1999.