DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Consumers' awareness and behavior intention on meat consumption according to climate change

  • 투고 : 2017.03.29
  • 심사 : 2017.04.16
  • 발행 : 2017.06.30

초록

Globally, consumers' enormous and increasing appetite for meat is one of the biggest causes of climate change because livestock industry emits more greenhouse gas than transportation. The purpose of this study is to analyze consumer awareness about the impact of meat consumption on sustainability in response to climate change. Based on the theory of planned behavior, the attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, prior knowledge, and risk perception variables were analyzed to evaluate the impact of climate change awareness over consumer behavior on meat consumption. Major findings are as follows: consumers were aware of climate change but has made few changes to their meat consumption. In addition, changes in meat consumption were found to be caused by health safety concerns, such as disease outbreaks. Significant variables related to meat consumption patterns associated to climate change impacts were household income, age, attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and prior knowledge. These results suggest some implications for policy. There is a need for public relations and education to make the public aware of and better understanding of link between climate change and diet. Also, government should make efforts to raise awareness of mitigation of climate change such as comprehensive food labels which are identifying lesser impacts on climate and better dietary guideline instructions which would include coping with climate change.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ajzen I. 1985. Media, from intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action-control: From cognition to behavior edited by Kuhl J, Beckmann J. pp. 11-39. Springer, Heidelberg.
  2. Bettman J. 1973. Information integration in consumer risk perception: A comparison of two models of component conceptualizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 60:381-385.
  3. Boer J, Schosler H, Boersema JJ. 2013. Climate change and meat eating: An inconvenient couple? Journal of Environmental Psychology 33:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.09.001
  4. Carlsson-Kanyama A, Gonzalez AD. 2009. Potential contributions of food consumption patterns to climate change. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 89:1704S-1709S. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736AA
  5. CCIC (Climate Change Information Center). 2016. Accessed in http://www.gihoo.or.kr.
  6. Chun HJ, Chung SH, Shin MK. 2010. Factors influencing consumer behavior regarding to climate change. Proceedings of 2010 Korea Home Management Association Spring Symposium 348. [in Korean]
  7. Duhan DF, Johnson SD, Wilcox JB, Harrell GD. 1997. Influences on consumer use of word-of-mouth recommendation sources. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25:283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070397254001
  8. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2007. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change.
  9. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2014. Accessed in http://www.ipcc.ch/index.htm.
  10. Kim BJ. 2012. Global climate change and task for agricultural sector. World Agriculture 146:1-29. [in Korean]
  11. Kim KB. 2008. Researches on dining-out consumers' patterns changing to climate change. M.S. thesis, Kyonggi Univ., Suwon, Korea. [in Korean]
  12. KMA (Korea Meteorological Administration). 2016. Accessed in http://www.kma.go.kr/.
  13. Lee S, Choi S, Lee YM. 2011. Projection of climate change effects on the potential distribution of Abeliophyllum distichum in Korea. CNU Journal of Agricultural Science 38:219-225. [in Korean]
  14. MacMillan T, Durrant R. 2009. Livestock consumption and climate change: A framework for dialogue. Discussion Paper. Food Ethics Council, Brighton.
  15. MAFRA (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs). 2016. 2016 Major statistics in agriculture and forestry. Seoul, Korea. [in Korean]
  16. McMichael AJ, Powles JW, Butler CD, Uauy R. 2007. Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health. Lancet 370:1253-1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61256-2
  17. Nelson GC, Rosegrant MW, Koo J, Robertson R, Sulser T, Zhu T, Ringler C, Msangi S, Palazzo A, Batka M, Magalhaes M, Valmonte-Santos R, Ewing M, Lee D. 2009. Climate change impact on agriculture and costs of adaptation. International Food Policy Research Institute.
  18. Oh D, Kim S, Khark K, Noh H. Go Y. 2010. Residents awareness analysis for climate change policy- focus on forest sector of Daejeon metropolitan city. CNU Journal of Agricultural Science. 37:19-25. [in Korean]
  19. Quan S, Zeng Y, Huang B, Yabe M. 2014. Chinese consumers' purchase intention of eco-labeled fish-Based on a survey to consumers in Beijing. Faculty of Agriculture Kyushu University 59:205-213.
  20. Song BK, Lee EY, Kim KH, Park KH. 2012. Consumers' awareness on climate change and food safety. Proceedings of 2012 Combined Symposium on Consumers 348. [in Korean]
  21. Tonglet M, Phillips PS, Read AD. 2004. Using the theory of planned behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behavior: A case study from Brixworth, UK. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 41:191-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2003.11.001
  22. Yoon SM. 2012. Analysis on behavior about adventurous leisure activity by using extended theory of planned behavior (ETPB): Focused on the role of prior knowledge and attachment. Korean Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 20:189-208.

피인용 문헌

  1. Analysis of trends on patents for unmanned technology used in agriculture vol.45, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20170063
  2. Livestock price change after anti-corruption law using VAR vol.45, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20170066
  3. Effect of different types of biochar on the growth of Chinese cabbage (Brassica chinensis) vol.45, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20180033
  4. Design, manufacture and field test of a surface water storage tank providing irrigation water to upland crops vol.47, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20200089