DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Mercury Emission Characteristic and Comparison Tests for Applicability of Latest Mercury Measuring Methods - Focus on the Cement Kiln -

시멘트 소성시설에서의 수은 배출특성 및 최신 측정방법 적용성 평가 연구

  • Kim, Hyung-Chun (Air Pollution Engineering Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Kim, Hee-Jin (Air Pollution Engineering Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Hyeon (Air Pollution Engineering Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Kang, Dea-Il (Air Pollution Engineering Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Park, Jung-Min (Air Pollution Engineering Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Kim, Jeong-Hun (Air Pollution Engineering Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research)
  • 김형천 (국립환경과학원 대기공학연구과) ;
  • 김희진 (국립환경과학원 대기공학연구과) ;
  • 김종현 (국립환경과학원 대기공학연구과) ;
  • 강대일 (국립환경과학원 대기공학연구과) ;
  • 박정민 (국립환경과학원 대기공학연구과) ;
  • 김정훈 (국립환경과학원 대기공학연구과)
  • Received : 2016.09.26
  • Accepted : 2017.06.04
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

Recently, there has been growing interest in the emission characteristics and behavior of anthropogenic mercury compounds from emission sources. It is required to establish a standard for reliable mercury measurement method. Therefore, this study has evaluated the applicability of the new measurement method; Continuous Emission Monitoring (US EPA 30A, CEM). In addition, the reliability evaluation was conducted through Ontario Hydro Method (ASTM D6784, OHM) and Sorbent trap method (US EPA Method 30B). As a monitoring result for three months via CEM from cement kiln, the maximum mercury compounds concentration was about $600{\mu}g/Sm^3$. This is because of the various of raw materials and fuel, and the absence of mercury-control device. The mercury compounds concentrations of OHM, Sorbent trap and CEM were 13.64 $(3.33{\sim}32.41){\mu}g/Sm^3$, $13.94(5.97{\sim}23.44){\mu}g/Sm^3$ and $14.68(6.19{\sim}26.75){\mu}g/Sm^3$, respectively. The relative standard deviations (% RSD) of the three methods were 5.1~40.9%. The result of this study suggest that it is possible to apply the CEM in the cement kiln when, QA/QC such as calibration is verified.

Keywords

References

  1. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (1998) Standard Test Method for Elemental, Oxidized, Particle-Bounce, and Total Mercury in Flue Gas Generated from Coal-Fierd Stationary Sources (Ontario Hydro Method).
  2. Kim, H.-C., R.-H. Kim, J.-H. Kim, S.-Y. Lim, D.-I. Kang, J.-H. Hong, and K.-W. Jang (2016) A Study on the Comparison of Measuring Methods and Development of Emission Factor on Mercury from Large-Scale Emission Sources, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 32(2), 184-192. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2016.32.2.184
  3. Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2015) Clean Air Conservation Act.
  4. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) (2008) A study on Mercury Emissions of Air Pollutants Emissions Sources, 75-77.
  5. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) (2012) A study on Intergrated Management of Mercury Using and Emission Facilities (III), 1-2.
  6. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) (2013) International Joint Research on Anthropogenic Emission Sources for Prepareation of a Global Legally Binding Instrument on Mercury. 3, 23-24.
  7. Park, J.-M., S.-B. Lee, H.-C. Kim, D.-J. Song, M.-S. Kim, M.-J. Kim, Y.-H. Kim, S.-H. Lee, J.-C. Kim, and S.-J. Lee (2010) Emission Characteristics of Mercury in Zn Smelting Process, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 26(5), 507-516. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2010.26.5.507
  8. Socha, J. (2014) Mercury Monitoring in a Cement Kiln, Thermo Scientific.
  9. Sung, J.-H., J.-S. Oh, S.-K. Back, B.-M. Jeong, H.-N. Jang, Y.-C. Seo, and S.-H. Kim (2016) Estimation of Mercury Emission from Major Sources in Annex D of Minamata Convention and Future Trend, Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 32(2), 193-207. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2016.32.2.193
  10. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2013) Global Mercury Assessment, 9-15.
  11. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2015) Guidance document on BAT/BEP, 14-16.
  12. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1995) AP-42, Fifth Edition Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Chapter 11 (Mineral Products Industry).
  13. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1996) Method 3052-Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Siliceous and Organically Based Matrices.
  14. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2007) Method 30B-Determination of Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission from Coal-fired Combustion Sources Using Carbon Sorbent Traps.
  15. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2010) Method 30A-Determination of Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission from Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Producer).
  16. Won, J.-H and T.-G. Lee (2012) Estimation of total annuall emissions from cement manufacturing facilities in Korea, Atmospheric Environment, 62, 265-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.08.035