Food Science of Animal Resources (한국축산식품학회지)

Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources (한국축산식품학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of the Duck Skin on Quality Characteristics of Duck Hams

  • Kim, Dong-Hyun (Food Processing Research Center, Korean Food Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Kyung (Food Processing Research Center, Korean Food Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Young-Boong (Food Processing Research Center, Korean Food Research Institute) ;
  • Sung, Jung-Min (Food Processing Research Center, Korean Food Research Institute) ;
  • Jang, YoungJin (Food Processing Research Center, Korean Food Research Institute) ;
  • Shim, Jae-Yun (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resources, Konkuk University) ;
  • Han, Sung-Gu (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology of Animal Resources, Konkuk University) ;
  • Choi, Yun-Sang (Food Processing Research Center, Korean Food Research Institute)
  • Received : 2017.02.16
  • Accepted : 2017.05.01
  • Published : 2017.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of duck skin on cooking loss, emulsion stability, pH, color, protein solubility, texture profile analysis (TPA), apparent viscosity, and sensory characteristics of press type duck ham with different ratio of duck breast meat and duck skin. Five duck ham formulations were produced with the following compositions: T1 (duck breast 70% + duck skin 30%), T2 (duck breast 60% + duck skin 40%), T3 (duck breast 50% + duck skin 50%), T4 (duck breast 40% + duck skin 60%), and T5 (duck breast 30% + duck skin 70%). The cooking loss and fat separation were lower in T1, and the total expressible fluid separations were lower in T1 and T2 than others. The pH ranged from 6.48 to 6.59, with the highest values in T4 and T5. T5 had the highest CIE $L^*$-value, and T1 and T2 had the highest CIE $a^*$-values; however, CIE $b^*$-values did not differ significantly between the duck ham samples. The protein solubility and TPA (hardness, springiness, cohesiveness, gumminess, and chewiness) were the highest in T1. T1 and T2 had higher scores for color, tenderness, and overall acceptability. T1, T2, and T3 showed significantly higher values, but there were no significant differences for flavor and juiciness. Regarding apparent viscosity properties, T1 and T2 had higher viscosity values than the other formulations. In conclusion, the T1 (duck breast 70% + duck skin 30%) and T2 (duck breast 60% + duck skin 40%) duck hams show the highest quality characteristics.

Keywords

References

  1. AOAC. (2000) Official methods of analysis of AOAC, Vol. 41. (17th ed.). Washington DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
  2. Bhat, Z. F., Kumar, P., and Kumar, S. (2013) Effect of skin, enrobing and refrigerated storage on the quality characteristics of chicken meat balls. J. Food Sci. Technol. 50, 890-899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0414-0
  3. Biswas, S., Chakraborty, A., Sarkar, S., Barpuzari, R. N., and Barpuzari, T. (2007) Effect of incorporation of chicken fat and skin on the quality of chicken sausages. J. Poult. Sci. 44, 111-115. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.44.111
  4. Bloukas, I. and Honikel, K. O. (1992) The influence of additives on the oxidation of pork back fat and its effect on water and fat binding in finely comminuted batters. Meat Sci. 32, 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(92)90015-V
  5. Bonifer, L. J., Froning, G. W., Mandigo, R. W., Cuppett, S. L., and Meagher, M. M. (1996) Textural, color, and sensory properties of bologna containing various levels of washed chicken skin. Poult. Sci. 75, 1047-1055. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0751047
  6. Bourne, M. C. (1978) Texture profile analysis. Food Technol. 32, 62-66.
  7. Cengiz, E. and Gokoglu, N. (2007) Effects of fat reduction and fat replacer addition on some quality characteristics of frankfurter-type sausages. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 42, 366-372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01357.x
  8. Chin, K. B., Keeton, J. T., Longnecker, M. T., and Lamkey, J. W. (1998) Functional, textural and microstructural properties of low-fat bologna (model system) with a konjac blend. J. Food Sci. 63, 801-807. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1998.tb17904.x
  9. Choe, J. H., Kim, H. Y., Lee, J. M., Kim, Y. J., and Kim, C. J. (2013) Quality of frankfurter-type sausages with added pig skin and wheat fiber mixture as fat replacers. Meat Sci. 93, 849-854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.11.054
  10. Choi, Y. S., Han, D. J., Choi, J. H., Hwang, K. E., Song, D. H., Kim, H. W., Kim, Y. B., and Kim, C. J. (2016) Effect of chicken skin on the quality characteristics of semi-dried restructured jerky. Poult. Sci. 95, 1198-1204. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew015
  11. Choi, Y. S., Jeong, J. Y., Choi, J. H., Han, D. J., Kim, H. Y., Lee, M. A., Kim, H. W., Paik, H. D., and Kim, C. J. (2008) Effects of dietary fiber from rice bran on the quality characteristics of emulsion-type sausages. Korean J. Food Sci. An. 28, 14-20. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2008.28.1.14
  12. Choi, Y. S., Jeong, T. J., Hwang, K. E., Kim, H. W., Kim, C. J., Sung, J. M., Oh, N. S., and Kim, Y. B. (2015) Effects of emulsion mapping in different parts of pork and beef. Korean J. Food Cook. Sci. 31, 241-247. https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2015.31.3.241
  13. Choi, Y. S., Lee, M. A., Jeong, J. Y., Choi, J. H., Han, D. J., Kim, H. Y., Lee, E. S., and Kim, C. J. (2007) Effects of wheat fiber on the quality of meat batter. Korean J. Food Sci. An. 27, 22-28 https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2007.27.1.22
  14. Crehan, C. M., Hughes, E., Troy, D. J., and Buckley, D. J. (2000) Effects of fat level and maltodextrin on the functional properties of frankfurters formulated with 5, 12 and 30% fat. Meat Sci. 55, 463-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00006-1
  15. Fenger, M. H., Aschemann-Witzel, J., Hansen, F., and Grunert, K. G. (2015) Delicious words-assessing the impact of short storytelling messages on consumer preferences for variations of a new processed meat product. Food Qual. Prefer. 41, 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.11.016
  16. Fotjik, T. and Mandigo, R. W. (1998) Utilization of raw pork skins in reduced fat fresh pork Sausage. Nebraska Swine Reports, University of Nebraska, pp. 42-44.
  17. Garcia, M. L., Dominguez, R., Galvez, M. D., Casas, C., and Selgas, M. D. (2002) Utilization of cereal and fruit fibres in low fat dry fermented sausages. Meat Sci. 60, 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00125-5
  18. Gomez, M. and Lorenzo, J. M. (2013) Effect of fat level on physicochemical, volatile compounds and sensory characteristics of dry-ripened "chorizo" from Celta pig breed. Meat Sci. 95, 658-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.06.005
  19. Grigelmo-Miguel, N., Abadias-Seros, M. I., and Martin-Belloso, O. (1999) Characterisation of low-fat high-dietary fibre frankfurters. Meat Sci. 52, 247-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00173-9
  20. Hamm, R. (1975) Water holding capacity of meat. In: Meat. Cole, N. A. and Lawire, R. A. (ed) Butterworth, London, pp. 321-337.
  21. Hefnawy, H. T. M. and Ramadan, M. F. (2011) Physicochemical characteristics of soy protein isolate and fenugreek gum dispersed systems. J. Food Sci. Technol. 48, 371-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0203-1
  22. Joo, S. T., Kauffman, R. G., Kim, B. C., and Park, G. B. (1999) The relationship of sarcoplasmic and myofibrillar protein solubility to colour and water-holding capacity in porcine longissimus muscle. Meat Sci. 52, 291-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00005-4
  23. Kang, G. H., Seong, P. N., Cho, S. H., Moon, S. S., Park, K. M., Kang, S. M., and Park, B. Y. (2014) Effect of addition duck skin on quality characteristics of duck meat sausages. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 41, 45-52. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2014.41.1.45
  24. Kim, H. W., Choi, J. H., Choi, Y. S., Han, D. J., Kim, H. Y., Lee, M. A., Shim, S. Y., and Kim, C. J. (2009) Effects of wheat fiber and isolated soy protein on the quality characteristics of frankfurter-type sausages. Korean J. Food Sci. An. 29, 475-481. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2009.29.4.475
  25. Kim, H. Y., Lee, J. W., Kim, J. H., and Kim, G. W. (2016) Quality properties of chicken nugget with various levels of chicken skin. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 43, 105-109. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2016.43.2.105
  26. Lee, S. J., Kim, K. H., Kim, Y. S., Kim, E. K., Hwang, J. W., Lim, B. O., Moon, S. H., Jeon, Y. J., Ahn, C. B., and Park, P. J. (2012) Biological activity from the gelatin hydrolysates of duck skin by-products. Process. Biochem. 47, 1150-1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2012.04.009
  27. Lorenzo, J. M., Temperan, S., Bermudez, R., Purrinos, L., and Franco, D. (2011) Effect of fat level on physicochemical and sensory properties of dry-cured duck sausages. Poult. Sci. 90, 1334-1339. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-01140
  28. Muhlisin, M., Kim, D. S., Song, Y. R., Kim, H. R., Kwon, H. J., An, B. K., Kang, C. W., Kim, H. K., and Lee, S. K. (2013) Comparison of meat characteristics between Korean native duck and imported commercial duck raised under identical rearing and feeding condition. Korean J. Food Sci. An. 33, 89-95. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2013.33.1.89
  29. Nuernberg, K., Slamecka, J., Mojto, J., Gasparik, J., and Nuernberg, G. (2011) Muscle fat composition of pheasants (Phasianus colchicus), wild ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) and black coots (Fulica atra). Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 57, 795-803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-010-0489-3
  30. Park, J. H., Choe, J. H., Kim, H. W., Hwang, K. E., Song, D. H., Yeo, E. J., Kim, H. Y., Choi, Y. S., Lee, S. H., and Kim, C. J. (2013) Effects of various extraction methods on quality characteristics of duck feet gelatin. Korean J. Food Sci. An. 33, 162-169. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2013.33.2.162
  31. Prieto, N., Roehe, R., Lavin, P., Batten, G., and Andres, S. (2009) Application of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy to predict meat and meat products quality: A review. Meat Sci. 83, 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.04.016
  32. Song, N. B., Song, H. Y., Jo, W. S., and Song, K. B. (2013) Physical properties of a composite film containing sunflower seed meal protein and its application in packaging smoked duck meat. J. Food Eng. 116, 789-795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.02.002
  33. Song, Y. R., Kim, D. S., Muhlisin, M., Seo, T. S., Jang, A., Pak, J. I., and Lee, S. K. (2014) Effect of chicken skin and pork backfat on quality of dakgalbi-taste chicken sausage. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 41, 181-189. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2014.41.3.181
  34. Weiss, J., Gibis, M., Schuh, V., and Salminen, H. (2010) Advances in ingredient and processing systems for meat and meat products. Meat Sci. 86, 196-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.05.008

Cited by

  1. Sensory evaluation of poultry meat: A comparative survey of results from normal sighted and blind people vol.14, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210722
  2. Technical Functional Properties of Water- and Salt-soluble Proteins Extracted from Edible Insects vol.39, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e56
  3. Extraction of crude gelatin from duck skin: effects of heating methods on gelatin yield vol.99, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez519
  4. Quality characteristics of semi-dried restructured jerky: combined effects of duck skin gelatin and carrageenan vol.62, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.4.553
  5. Physiochemical properties of reduced-fat duck meat emulsion systems: effects of preemulsification with vegetable oils and duck skin vol.100, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.10.044
  6. Olive oil-in-water emulsion as a source of desirable fatty acids in free-range “Caipira” chicken ham vol.144, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111216