DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A visual identification key to Orchidaceae of Korea

  • Received : 2017.05.28
  • Accepted : 2017.06.25
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

Species identification is a fundamental and routine process in plant systematics, and linguistic-based dichotomous keys are widely used in the identification process. Recently, novel tools for species identification have been developed to improve the accuracy, ease to use, and accessibility related to these tasks for a broad range of users given the advances in information and communications technology. A visual identification key is such an approach, in which couplets consist of images of plants or a part of a plant instead of botanical terminology. We developed a visual identification key for 101 taxa of Orchidaceae in Korea and evaluated its performance. It uses short statements for image couplets to avoid misinterpretations by users. The key at the initial steps (couplets) uses relatively easy characters that can be determined with the naked eye. The final steps of the visual key provide images of species and information about distributions and flowering times to determine the species that best fit the available information. The number of steps required to identify a species varies, ranging from three to ten with an average of 4.5. A performance test with senior college students showed that species were accurately identified using the visual key at a rate significantly higher than when using a linguistic-based dichotomous key and a color manual. The findings presented here suggest that the proposed visual identification key is a useful tool for the teaching of biodiversity at schools, for the monitoring of ecosystems by citizens, and in other areas that require rapid, easy, and accurate identifications of species.

Keywords

References

  1. Attigala, L., N. I. de Silva and L. G. Clark. 2016. Simple webbased interactive key development software (WEBiKEY) and an example key for Kuruna (Poaceae: Bambusoideae). Applications in Plant Sciences 4: 1500128. https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1500128
  2. Atwood, J. T. 1986. The size of the Orchidaceae and the systematic distribution of epiphytic orchids. Selbyana 9: 171-186.
  3. Brach, A. R. and H. Song. 2005. ActKey: A web-based interactive identification key program. Taxon 54: 1041-1046. https://doi.org/10.2307/25065490
  4. Chase, M. W. 2005. Classification of Orchidaceae in the age of DNA data. Curtis's Botanical Magazine 22: 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1355-4905.2005.00466.x
  5. Coleman, C. O., J. K. Lowry and T. Macfarlane. 2010. DELTA for beginners: An introduction into the taxonomy software package DELTA. ZooKeys 45: 1-75. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.45.263
  6. Cope, E. A. 2001. Muenscher's Keys to Woody Plants: An Expanded Guide to Native and Cultivated Species. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 337 pp.
  7. dela Cruz, T. E. E. M., M. V. B. Pangilinan and R. A. Litao. 2012. Printed identification key or web-based identification guide: An effective tool for species identification? Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education 13: 180-182. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v13i2.426
  8. Dalwitz, M. J., T. A. Paine and E. J. Zurcher. 1993 onwards. User's guide to the DELTA system: A general system for processing taxonomic descriptions, 4th ed. Retrieved Jun. 2, 2017, available from: http://delta-intkey.com/.
  9. Doorenweerd, C., M. M. van Haren, M. Schermer, S. Pieterse and E. J. van Nieukerken. 2014. A Linnaeus NGTM interactive key to the Lithocolletinae of North-West Europe aimed at accelerating the accumulation of reliable biodiversity data (Lepidoptera, Gracillariidae). ZooKeys 422: 87-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.422.7446
  10. Dressler, R. L. 1993. Phylogeny and Classification of the Orchid Family. Dioscorides Press, Portland, OR, 314 pp.
  11. Eltz, T., Y. Zimmermann, J. Haftmann, R. Twele, W. Francke, J. J. G. Quezada-Euan and K. Lunau. 2007. Enfleurage, lipid recycling and the origin of perfume collection in orchid bees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 22: 2843-2848.
  12. Gleason, H. A. and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. The New York Botanical Garden, New York, 993 pp.
  13. Gutierrez, R. M. P. 2010. Orchids: A review of uses in traditional medicine, its phytochemistry and pharmacology. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 4: 592-638.
  14. Kasulo, V., L. Mwabumba and C. Munthali. 2009. A review of edible orchids in Malawi. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry 1: 133-139.
  15. Kirchoff, B. K., R. Leggett, V. Her, C. Moua, J. Morrison and C. Poole. 2011. Principles of visual key construction: With a visual identification key to the Fagaceae of the southeastern United States. AoB Plants 2011: plr005.
  16. Lawrence, A. and W. Hawthorne. 2006. Plant Identification: Creating User-Friendly Field Guides for Biodiversity Management. Earthscan, London, 268 pp.
  17. Lee, N. S. 2011. Illustrated Flora of Korean Orchids. Ewha Womans University Press, Seoul, 345 pp. (in Korean)
  18. Lee, N. S., W.-B. Lee, B.-H. Choi and K.-W. Tae. 2007. Orchidaceae. In The Genera of Vascular Plants of Korea. Park, C.-W. (ed.), Academy Publishing Co., Seoul. Pp. 1339-1376.
  19. Lee, T. B. 2003. Coloured Flora of Korea. Hyangmunsa, Seoul, 910 pp. (in Korean)
  20. Martellos, S. and P. L. Nimis. 2015. From local checklists to online identification portals: A case study on vascular plants. PLoS ONE 10: e0120970. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120970
  21. Martellos, S., L. Ukosich and M. Avian. 2016. JellyWeb: An interactive information system on Scyphozoa, Cubozoa and Staurozoa. ZooKeys 554: 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.554.6745
  22. Nimis, P. L., R. Riccamboni and S. Martellos. 2012. Identification keys on mobile devices: The Dryades experience. Plant Biosystems 146: 783-788. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2012.740089
  23. Ohwi, J. 1965. Flora of Japan. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., 1067 pp.
  24. Park, C.-W. (ed.) 2007. The Genera of Vascular Plants of Korea. Academy Publishing Co., Seoul, 1482 pp.
  25. Simpson, M. G. 2010. Plant Systematics. 2nd ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 740 pp.
  26. Stagg, B. C., M. E. Donkin and A. M. Smith. 2015. Bryophytes for beginners: The usability of a printed dichotomous key versus a multi-access computer-based key for bryophyte identification. Journal of Biological Education 49: 274-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2014.934900
  27. Swarts, N. D. and K. W. Dixon. 2009. Terrestrial orchid conservation in the age of extinction. Annals of Botany 104: 543-556. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp025

Cited by

  1. Electronic identification keys for species with cryptic morphological characters: a feasibility study using some Thesium species vol.172, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.172.53484