Journal of Navigation and Port Research (한국항해항만학회지)

Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research (한국항해항만학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Degree of Collision Risk through Analysing the Risk Attitude of Vessel Traffic Service Operators

해상교통관제사의 위험태도 분석을 통한 선박 충돌 위험도 연구

  • Lee, Jin-Suk (Graduate school of Korea Maritime and Ocean University) ;
  • Song, Chae-Uk (Division of Navigation, Korea Maritime and Ocean University)
  • Received : 2016.12.01
  • Accepted : 2017.02.27
  • Published : 2017.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

When VTSOs (Vessel Traffic Service Operator) determine the degree of collision risk for two vessels, they consider comprehensive information about each vessel's course, speed, DCPA, TCPA, and encountering situation. In this study, we proposed a utility function based on the risk attitudes of VTSOs toward the Risk Index (RI). The RI was calculated using the risk of encounter, the risk of approach, and the risk of time for two vessels in order to predict each ship's collision risk from the VTS viewpoint. We obtained each coefficient of the RI and the risk attitude through a survey of collision risks among VTSOs of Korea. In order to verify whether the proposed utility is reasonable, we validated by applying the degree of collision risk to some historical cases of accidents in Busan port along with the Ship of ES value($ES_S$) of ES(Environmental Stress) model.

일반적으로 VTSO(Vessel Traffic Service Operator)는 양 선박의 충돌위험 정도를 판단할 때, 선박들의 침로와 속력, DCPA(Distance to CPA)와 TCPA(Time to CPA) 그리고 양 선박의 조우 상황 등을 종합적으로 고려한다. 이에 본 연구에서는 VTS(Vessel Traffic Service) 관점에서의 선박충돌위험을 예측하는 방법으로 위험지수(Risk Index, RI)를 선박 조우 상황에 따른 위험, 선박 간 근접거리에 따른 위험 그리고 접근시간에 따른 위험으로 나누어 구하고, VTSO의 위험 태도를 반영한 충돌 위험도를 제안하였다. 위험지표의 각 계수와 위험 태도는 VTSO 설문을 실시하여 구하였고, 제안한 위험도의 타당성 검증을 위하여 부산항의 실제 사고 사례에 ES(Environmental Stress) 모델의 교통 환경 스트레스치($ES_S$)을 함께 적용하여 유효성을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ang AH-S, Tang WH.(1984), "Probability concepts in engineering planning and design" Volume II-decision, risk, and reliability. New York, Wiley and Sons.
  2. Busan Maritime Safety Tribunal(2015), A Written Judgment for Collision Accident between 107 DAEYANG and HYUNDAI BRIDGE.
  3. Coldwell TG.(1983), "Marine traffic behaviour in restricted waters", Journal of Navigation, 36(3), pp. 430-444. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300039783
  4. Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Derby, S. L., & Keeney, R. L.(1981), "Acceptable risk", Cambridge University Press.
  5. Fujii Y, Tanaka K.(1971), "Traffic capacity", Journal of Navigation, 24(4), pp. 543-552. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300022384
  6. Goodwin EM.(1975), "A statistical study of ship domains", Journal of Navigation, 28(03), pp. 328-344. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300041230
  7. Gong, I. Y.(2003), "A review on the Characteristics of Environmental Stress Model for Maritime Traffic Safety Assessment", Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 479-486.
  8. Hansen Friis(2008), "Basic Modelling Principles for Prediction of Collision and Grounding Frequencies", Technical University of Denmark, pp. 58.
  9. Inoue, K., Kubono, M., Miyasaka, M., and Hara,D.(1998a)，"Modeling of Mariners' Perception of Safety when Being Faced with Imminent Danger (In Japanese)", JoumaJ of Japan Institute of Navigation, pp. 235-245.
  10. Jeong, T. G., 2003. A New Approach to the Evaluation of Collision Risk using Sech Function. Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, 27(2), pp. 103-110. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2003.27.2.103
  11. Jutta Ylitalo(2010), "Modelling Marine Accident Frequency" Aalto University, School of Science and Technology, Master's thesis, pp. 21-24
  12. Keeney RL, Raiffa H.(1993), "Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs", Cambridge University Press.
  13. Kim, K. I., Jung, J. S., Park, G. K.(2012), "A Study on Development of Maritime Traffic Assessment Model" Journal of Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems, Vol.22, No.6, pp. 761-767 https://doi.org/10.5391/JKIIS.2012.22.6.761
  14. Kim, Y. W.(2008). "Risk, Crisis & Communication", Ewha Womans University Press.
  15. Korean Maritime Safety Tribunal(2015), Statistics of Marine Accident for the Past 5 Years, Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, South Korea
  16. Lee, J. S., Jung, M., Song, C. U.(2015), "A Study on the Degree of Collision Risk with Relative Bearing at CPA", Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 493-498. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2015.39.6.493
  17. Lee, J. S., Kim, J. H., Jang, E. K.(2016), "Analysis of VTS Operators' Situational Awareness Based on In-Field Observation and Subjective Rating Methods", Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 375-384. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2016.40.6.375
  18. MacCrimmon, K. R.. & Wehrung, D. A.(1986), "Taking risks; The management of uncertainty", New York, The Free Press.
  19. Park, J. S., Park, Y. S., Lee, H. K.(2010), "Marin Traffic Engineering", pp. 163-167
  20. Renn, O., & Levine, D.(1991), "Credibility and trust in risk communication", In R. E. Kasperson & P. J. M..
  21. Son, N. S., Kim, S. Y., Gong, I. Y.(2009), "Study on the Estimation of Collision Risk of Ship in Ship Handling Simulator using Fuzzy Algorithm and Environmental Stress Model", Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 43-50. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2009.33.1.043
  22. You Dong, Dan M. Frangopol.(2015), "Probabilistic ship collision risk and sustainability assessment considering risk attitudes", Structural Safety 53, pp. 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.10.004