East Asian Economic Review

  • 제21권2호
  • /
  • Pages.103-121
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2508-1640(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-1667(eISSN)
대외경제정책연구원 (Korea Institute for International Economic Policy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Experimental Study on Internal and External Negotiation for Trade Agreements

  • 투고 : 2017.05.26
  • 심사 : 2017.06.28
  • 발행 : 2017.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper experimentally studies the performance of negotiation considering individual and party, like a country, share of benefit over the best ones. It experiments two-stage bargaining games, internal and external negotiations. From the experimental results, this paper shows strong tendency to select fair allocation in the internal negotiations, but the tendency would be weaker with attractive outside option. In addition, the outside option may claim difference in individual benefit. From the regressions on individual performance in the negotiations, being a proposing party would matter to enhance the performance. However, relative individual performance within party fairness matters. Still attractive no-agreement options happen to break the tendency. As policy implication for trade negotiation, this paper warns that possible loss in individual benefit from not active participation to the external negotiations, no active role of proposer in case that players stick to internal allocations, and deviation of advantageous sector due to attractive outside options.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baron, D. and J. Ferejohn. 1989. "Bargaining in Legislatures," American Political Science Review, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 1181-1206. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961664
  2. Frechette, G., Kagel, J. and S. Lehrer. 2003. "Bargaining in Legislatures: An Experimental Investigation of Open versus Closed Amendment Rules," American Political Science Review, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 221-232.
  3. Frechette, G., Kagel, J. and M. Morelli. 2005a. "Gamson's Law versus Non-Cooperative Bargaining Theory," Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 365-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2004.11.003
  4. Frechette, G., Kagel, J. and M. Morelli. 2005b. "Nominal Bargaining Power, Selection Protocol and Discounting in Legislative Bargaining," Journal of Public Economics, vol. 89, no. 8, pp. 1497-1517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.02.009
  5. Frechette, G., Kagel, J. and M. Morelli. 2005c. "Behavioral Identification in Coalitional Bargaining: An Experimental Analysis of Demand Bargaining and Alternating Offers," Econometrica, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 1893-1937.
  6. Gamson, W. 1961. "A Theory of Coalition Formation," American Sociological Review, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 373-382. https://doi.org/10.2307/2090664
  7. Kagel, J., Sung, H. and E. Winter. 2010. "Veto Power in Committees: An Experimental Study," Experimental Economics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 167-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-010-9234-8
  8. Morelli, M. 1999. "Demand Competition and Policy Compromise in Legislative Bargaining," American Political Science Review, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 809-820. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586114
  9. Sung, H. 2012. "Delays in Multilateral Trade Negotiations: An Experimental Study," Asian Economic Papers, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 160-176. https://doi.org/10.1162/ASEP_a_00131
  10. Sung, H. 2015a. "Learning in the WTO/DDA Negotiations?: An Experimental Study," Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 243-273. https://doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.2015.19.3.298
  11. Sung, H. 2015b. "An Experimental Economic Study on the U.S.-E.U. FTA: A Perspective on Within-Industry," Journal of International Trade and Industry Study, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 109-127.
  12. Winter, E. 1996. "Voting and Vetoing," American Political Science Review, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 813-823. https://doi.org/10.2307/2945844