DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Variation for Morphological Characters in Cultivated and Weedy Types of Perilla frutescens Britt. Germplasm

  • Luitel, Binod Prasad (National Potato Research Program, Nepal Agricultural Research Council) ;
  • Ko, Ho-Cheol (National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA) ;
  • Hur, On-Sook (National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA) ;
  • Rhee, Ju-Hee (National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA) ;
  • Baek, Hyung-Jin (National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA) ;
  • Ryu, Kyoung-Yul (International Technology Cooperation Center, RDA) ;
  • Sung, Jung-Sook (National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA)
  • Received : 2017.02.03
  • Accepted : 2017.06.12
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

Morphological variation between cultivated and weedy types of Perilla frutescens var. frutescens and P. frutescens var. crispa were studied in 327 germplasm by examining 17 morphological characters. The germplasm between the two varieties were varied for their qualitative and quantitative characters. The seed coat color of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens is commonly light brown and brown while deep brown color was observed in the weedy type P. frutescens var. frutescens and P. frutescens var. crispa. The leaf size, cluster length, plant height, flower number per cluster and seed weight in cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens were significantly (P<0.05) different from weedy type P. frutescens var. frutescens and P. frutescens var. crispa. The cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens exhibited significantly higher plant height (158.6 cm) compared to the weedy P. frutescens var. crispa (133.8 cm). Likewise, seed weight was significantly higher in cultivated (1.9 g) than in the weedy type of P. frutescens var. frutescens (1.6 g) and P. frutescens var. crispa (1.4 g). Principal component analysis (PCA) result showed that the first and second principal component cumulatively explained 86.6% of the total variation. The cultivated type P. frutescens var. frutescens and its weedy accessions were not clearly separated with P. frutescens var. crispa by PCA. Hence it requires the use of molecular markers for better understanding of their genetic diversity.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, Y.S. 2015. Uses and values of perilla (Perilla frutescens var. frutescens) as a functional oil source. Korean J. Plant Res. 28(1):135-144 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2015.28.1.135
  2. Hancock, J.F. 1992. Plant evolution and the origin of crop species. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (USA). pp. 122-131.
  3. Honda, G., A. Yuba, T. Kojima and M. Tabata. 1994. Chemotaxonomic and cytogenetic studies on Perilla frutescens var. citriodora ("Lemon Egoma"). Nat. Medicines 48(3):185-190.
  4. Honda, G., Y. Koezuka and M. Tabata. 1990. Genetic studies of fruit color and hardness in Perilla frutescens. Jpn. J. Breed. 40(4):469-474. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs1951.40.469
  5. Jung, J.N., K. Heo, M.J. Kim and J.K. Lee. 2008. Morphological variations between cultivated types of perilla crop and their weedy types in Korea and Japan. Korean J. Breed. Sci. 40(4):361-370 (in Korean).
  6. Key, J.M. 1988. A plant breeder's perspective on taxonomy of cultivated plants. Biol. Zentralblatt 107(4):369-379.
  7. Kim, I.J. M.J. Kim, C.H. Lee. and S.Y. Nam. 2005. Comparison of the agronomic characteristics of perilla (Perilla ocimoides L.) collected from Korean and Chinese Jilim Province. Korean J. Plant Res. 18(1):179-185 (in Korean).
  8. Kim, J.A., K.J. Sa, S.H. Choi and J.K. Lee. 2013. Morphological variation of cultivated types of perilla crop and their weedy types in East and Southeast Asia. Korean J. Crop Sci. 58(4): 408-415 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2013.58.4.408
  9. Koezuka, Y., G. Honda and M. Tabata. 1986. Genetic control of the chemical composition of volatile oils in Perilla frutescens. Photochemistry 25(4):859-863. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(86)80017-6
  10. Koezuka, Y., G. Honda, S. Sakamoto and M. Tabata. 1985. Genetic control of anthocyanin production on Perilla frutescens. Shoyakugaku Zasshi 39(3):228-231.
  11. Lee, J.K. and O. Ohnishi. 2001. Geographical differentiation of morphological characters among perilla crops and their weedy types in East Asia. Breeding Sci. 51(4):247-255. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.51.247
  12. Lee, J.K. and O. Ohnishi. 2003. Genetic relationship among cultivated types of Perilla frutescens and their weedy types in East Asia revealed by AFLP markers. Genet. Resour. Crop Ev. 50(1):65-74. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022951002271
  13. Lee, J.K., M. Nitta, N.S. Kim, C.H. Park, K.M. Yoon, Y.B. Shin and O. Ohnishi. 2002. Genetic diversity of perilla and related weedy types in Korea determined by AFLP analyses. Crop Sci. 42(6):2161-2166. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.2161
  14. Lee, S.H., J.K. Ahn and H.I. Moon. 1997. Variation in the major essential oils content under different leaf-picking time of Perilla frutescens spp. Korean J. Plant Res. 10(4):314-318 (in Korean).
  15. Makino, T. 1961. Makino's New Illustrated Flora of Japan. Hokuryn-Kan Pub., Tokyo. Japan. p. 1060.
  16. Nam, S.Y., I.J. Kim, M.J. Kim, C.H. Lee and T.S. Kim. 2003. Agronomic characters of local perilla collected in the southern part of Korea. Korean J. Plant Res. 16(2):155-159 (in Korean).
  17. Nam, S.Y., I.J. Kim, M.J. Kim, C.H. Lee and T.S. Kim. 2004. Characteristics of local perilla collected in Kangwon province of Korea. Korean J. Plant Res. 17(2):213-218 (in Korean).
  18. Nam, S.Y., I.J. Kim, M.J. Kim, C.H. Lee, T.S. Kim and C.B. Park. 2003. Studies on the cropping system of perilla in middle provinces of Korea. Korean J. Plant Res. 16(2): 134-140 (in Korean).
  19. Nitta, M. 2001. Origin perilla crops and their weedy type. Department of Agriculture, Ph.D Thesis, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. p. 78.
  20. Nitta, M. and O. Ohnishi. 1999. Genetic relationships among two perilla crops, shiso and egoma, and the weedy type revealed by RAPD marker. Genes. Genet. Syst. 74(2):43-48. https://doi.org/10.1266/ggs.74.43
  21. Nitta, M., J.K. Lee and O. Ohnishi. 2003. Asian perilla crops and their weedy forms: their cultivation, utilization and genetic relationships. Eco. Bot. 57(2):245-253. https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2003)057[0245:APCATW]2.0.CO;2
  22. Seong, E.S., E.W. Seo, I.M. Chung, M.J. Kim, H.Y. Kim, J.H. Yoo, J.H. Choi, N.J. Kim and C.Y. Yu. 2015. Growth characteristics and phenol compounds analysis of collected Perilla frutescens resources from China and Japan. Korean J. Medicinal Crop Sci. 23(2):132-137 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7783/KJMCS.2015.23.2.132
  23. Song, J.Y., J.R. Lee, S. Oh, C.Y. Kim, C.H. Bae, G.A. Lee, K.H. Ma, Y.M. Choi, H.J. Park and M.C. Lee. 2012. Assessment of genetic diversity and fatty acid composition of perilla (Perilla frutescens var. frutescens) germplasm. Korean J. Plant Res. 25(6):762-772 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2012.25.6.762

Cited by

  1. Using Phenolic Compounds and Some Morphological Characters as Distinguishing Factors to Evaluate the Diversity of Perilla Genetic Resources vol.33, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2020.33.1.40