Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea (한국지진공학회논문집)

Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea (한국지진공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of Code-specified Ground Motion Selection Criteria with Accurate Selection and Scaling Methods - II Seismic Response

구조물 동적해석을 위한 현행 내진설계기준의 입력 지반 운동 선정 조건 타당성 평가 - II 지진응답

  • 하성진 (한국전력공사 전력연구원) ;
  • 한상환 (한양대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 오장현 (한양대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2017.03.08
  • Accepted : 2017.06.16
  • Published : 2017.07.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Current seismic design provisions such as ASCE 7-10 provide criteria for selecting ground motions for conducting response history analysis. This study is the sequel of a companion paper (I - Ground Motion Selection) for assessment of the ASCE 7-10 criteria. To assess of the ASCE 7-10 criteria, nonlinear response history analyses of twelve single degree of freedom (SDF) systems and one multi-degree of freedom (MDF) system are conducted in this study. The results show that the target seismic demands for SDF can be predicted using the mean seismic demands over seven and ten ground motions selected according to the proposed method within an error of 30% and 20%, respectively

Keywords

References

  1. ASCE. Minimum design loads for building and other structures (ASCE 7-10). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia. c2010.
  2. Reyes JJ, Kalkan E. How many records should be used in an ASCE/SEI-7 ground motion scaling procedure? Earthq Spectra. 2012 Aug;28(3):1223-1242. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000066
  3. Kalkan E, Celebi M. Assessment of ASCE-7 ground motion scaling method using computer model of instrumented high-rise building. Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures. San Francisco, CA, USA. c2009.
  4. Araujo M, Macedo L, Marques M, Castro JM. Code-based record selection methods for seismic performance assessment of buildings. Earthq Eng Struct D. 2016 Jul;45(1):129-148. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2620
  5. ASCE. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia. c2014.
  6. CEN. ENV 1998-1 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium. c2004.
  7. NZS. NZS 1170.5: 2004 Structural design actions. Part 5: earthquake actions - New Zealand. New Zealand Standard, Wellington, New Zealand. c2004.
  8. Chiou B, Darragh R, Gregor N, Silva W. NGA project strong motion database. Earthq Spectra. 2012 Feb;24(1), 3-44. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2894833
  9. Gupta A, Krawinkler H. Seismic demands for performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures (SAC Task 5.4.3). Report No. 132. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.c1999.
  10. Wang G. A ground motion selection and modification method capturing response spectrum characteristics and variability of scenario earthquakes. Soil Dyn and Earthq Eng. 2011 Apr;31(4):611-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.11.007
  11. PEER. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSEES). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, California University, Berkeley, CA, USA. c2099.