DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact Characteristics of Subsea Pipeline Considering Seabed Properties and Burial Depth

해저지반 성질과 매설깊이 변화에 따른 해저파이프의 충돌 특성

  • Shin, Mun-Beom (Department of Ocean Engineering, Korea Maritime and Ocean University) ;
  • Seo, Young-kyo (Department of Ocean Engineering, Korea Maritime and Ocean University)
  • 신문범 (한국해양대학교 해양공학과) ;
  • 서영교 (한국해양대학교 해양공학과)
  • Received : 2017.02.06
  • Accepted : 2017.06.22
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

In this study, the impact characteristics of subsea pipelines that were installed in various soil types and burial depths were evaluated by a numerical method. An impact scenario replicated a dropped ship anchor that fell vertically and impacted an installed subsea pipeline. In order to calculate the impact force through terminal velocity, FLUENT, a computational fluid dynamic program and MDM (Moving Deforming Mesh) technique were applied. Next, a dynamic finite element program, ANSYS Explicit Dynamics, was used for impact analysis between the anchor and pipeline (or, subsea if they were buried). Three soil types were considered: loose sand, dense sand and soft clay by applying the Mohr-coulomb model to the seabed. The buried depth was assumed to be 0 m, 1 m and 2 m. In conclusion, a subsea pipeline was the most stable when buried in dense sand at a depth of 2 m to prevent impact damage.

Keywords

References

  1. ANSYS Inc., 2010. ANSYS FLUENT MDM Tutorials. ANSYS v130, Canonsburg.
  2. ANSYS Inc., 2016. ANSYS Explicit dynamics Tutorials. ANSYS v171, Canonsburg.
  3. Massey, B.S., Ward-Smith, J., 2006. Mechanics of Fluids. 8th Edition, USA.
  4. DNV., 2010. Risk Assessment of Pipeline Protection Recommended Practice DNV-RP-F107. Det Norske Veritas., Norway.
  5. Escoe, A.K., 2006. Piping and Pipeline Assessment Guide. 1st Edition, UK.
  6. Jung, J.J., Lee, Y.S., Shin, H.S., 2007. A Study for Construction of Shore-end Submarine Cable. Journal of The Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Sciences, 2(3), 203-209.
  7. KS V 3311., 2012. Anchor. Korea Industrial Standards.
  8. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), 2013. Filtered Incident Files. (Updated April 2014) Available at: [Accessed March 2014].
  9. Ryu, Y.S., Cho, H.M., Kim, S.H., 2016. Damage Evaluation of Flexible Concrete Mattress Considering Steel Reinforcement Modeling and Collision Angle of Anchor. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 30(2), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.5574/KSOE.2016.30.2.109
  10. Stephen, P.B., Michael, C., 2007. Correlations of Soil Properties. 5th Edition, USA.
  11. Woo, J.H., Na, W.B., 2010. Analyses of the Maximum Response of Cylinders-Connected Protector under Anchor Colliding and Dragging. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 24(5), 81-87.
  12. Woo, J.H., Na, W.B., Kim, H.T., 2009. Numerical Simulation of Arch-type Submarine Cable Protector under Anchor Collision. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 23(1), 96-103.