벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제12권2호
  • /
  • Pages.65-76
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

대학 창업교육의 고도화를 위한 창의적 문제해결역량교육에 대한 고찰: 해외의 교육정책 및 사례분석의 시사점

A Study on the Creative Problem-Solving Education in Entrepreneurship Education of Higher Educational Institutions: Lessons and Implications From Leading Countries' Educational Policies and Cases

  • 김지영 (동국대학교 기술창업학과) ;
  • 성창수 (동국대학교 기술창업학과) ;
  • 박주연 (연세대학교 경영학과)
  • Kim, Jiyoung (Dept. of Technology Entrepreneurship, Graduate School, Dongguk University) ;
  • Sung, Chang Soo (Dept. of Technology Entrepreneurship, Graduate School, Dongguk University) ;
  • Park, Joo Y. (School of Business, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2017.03.10
  • 심사 : 2017.04.28
  • 발행 : 2017.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 창업교육에 있어 중요한 창의적 문제해결역량에 관한 연구를 살펴보고, 해외의 창의적 문제해결역량교육 관련 정책과 우수 대학의 교과과정 사례를 분석하여 국내의 창의적 문제해결역량교육의 문제점을 극복하기 위한 교육의 프레임워크 및 대학의 역할에 대하여 시사점을 제시하고자 하는 것이다. 이에 문제해결 역량에 관한 기존 연구들과 해외 국가 및 대학의 문제해결 교육 정책 및 교육과정 사례를 중심으로 창의적 문제해결역량교육을 위한 프레임워크를 제시하였다. 본 연구에서 제시한 창의적 문제해결역량교육 프레임워크는 크게 문제정의, 문제해결방법, 결과적용의 체계로 다음과 같은 구성을 포함한다. 첫째, 창의적 문제해결 교육의 첫 번째 단계인 이론기반 교육과 지속적인 지도와 멘토링의 구성이다. 둘째, 해외대학에서 교육의 주요 정책으로 내세우는 팀기반 학습법이다. 셋째, 체계적인 교육과정평가 개발이다. 넷째, 현장 연계형 및 융합형 패러다임의 구축이다. 이러한 프레임워크를 통해 국내 창의적 문제해결역량교육의 시사점을 국가, 대학, 교과과정 설계차원으로 제시하고, 창업교육과의 상호관계 및 융합의 중요성을 제시한다.

The purpose of this study is to promote the activation of creative problem - solving education in Korea through the case of countries leading education for creative problem solving in order to overcome the limitation of creative problem solving education in Korea. Based on 5 success factors by our cases of United States, Singapore, and Dublin City University in Ireland, we focused on the cases and extracted five key characteristics of creative problem solving education. The university should be able to provide various information gathering and theoretical knowledge for problem definition as well as continuing guidance and mentoring, rather than one-time teaching, in the form of teaching-student cooperative learning paradigm. Second, the class should be a team - based learning team which is a key factor in overseas universities' policy, so as to be able to identify differentiated, new ideas and creative problem solving methods based on knowledge and experience sharing. The creative problem solving method derived from education could be able to collect, organize, and apply to the field continuously and comprehensively about the learning process of the individual. Evaluation of curriculum should be based on characteristics of school and characteristics of students. The results of creative problem-solving education should be evaluated in order to continuously develop and create value in addition to the outcomes of the class. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an evaluation process for each university. The university should try to make creative problem solving education create value through specialization of university. Based on this, we propose a creative problem solving education framework.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baek, Y. S., Park, H. J., Kim, Y. M., Noh, S. G., Park, J. Y., Lee, J. Y. & Han, H. S.(2011), STEAM Education in Korea, Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(4), 149-171.
  2. Bang, M. S.(2013), Conceptual exploration and legal policy task of 'Government 3.0, Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society. 16(3).
  3. Choi, J. I.(2007), A Case Study for the Application of PBL in Higher-Education: Focused on the Effectiveness of PBL Presented in Reflective Journal, Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2), 35-65. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.23.2.35
  4. Choi, J. I. & Park, C. G.(2013), The Key Success Factors of University Entrepreneurship Education: Implication from USA University Cases, Asia-Pacific, Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 8(3), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.8.3.201309.85
  5. Choi, J. I. & Yang, Y. S.(2012), Program Development for Entrepreneurship Education, Asia-Pacific, Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.7.1.201203.125
  6. Choi, M. G. & Park, E. J.(2012), A Study on The Effects of Youth Entrepreneurship Education on Entrepreneurial Intention: Focused on The Undergraduate Students in Culture Tourism, Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 24(5), 201-220.
  7. Choi, S. D.(2011), Future Strategies for Educating Creative Talents in the 21st Century(RR2011-01), Korea Educational Development Institute.
  8. Chung, D. B., Kim, S. J., Song, Y. J. & Hwang, Y. H.(2015), A study on the status of the idea supported platform: Focusing on the diffusion of the Creative Economy Town, Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 3, 37-44.
  9. CISCO(2010b), The Learning Society, Cisco.
  10. Davidsson, P.(2015), Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 674-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.002
  11. Dublin City University(2017), Problem solving, Retrieved from https://www.dcu.ie.
  12. Embassy of Australia in Korea(2017), Exploring Creative Art at Sydney University, Retrieved from, http://studyinaustralia.tistory.com/389.
  13. Embretson, S. E. & Daniel, R. C.(2008), Understanding and quantifying cognitive complexity level in mathematical problem solving items, Psychology Science, 50(3), 328.
  14. Fasko, D.(2001), Education and creativity, Creativity research journal, 13(3-4), 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_09
  15. Gordon, S.(2006), Making sense of the inclusion debate under IDEA, BYU Educ. & LJ, 189.
  16. Han, K. S.(2012), Current Status and Tasks of University Creativity Education, The 1st College Creativity Education Symposium, Sungkyunkwan University Dasan creative center, 16-28.
  17. Isaksen, S. G., Dorval, K. B. & Treffinger, D. J.(2000), Creative approaches to problem solving: A framework for change, Kendall Hunt Publishing Company.
  18. Isaksen, S. G. & Treffinger, D. J.(2004), Celebrating 50 years of reflective practice: Versions of creative problem solving, Journal of Creative Behavior, 38, 75-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2004.tb01234.x
  19. Jonassen, D. H.(2000), Toward a design theory of problem solving, Educational technology research and development, 48(4), 63-85.
  20. Jung, Y. C.(2017), Fourth industry education should focus on morality, cooperation, problem solving ability, and curiosity, Brain media. Retrieved from http://www.brainmedia.co.kr/brainWorldMedia/ContentView.aspx?contIdx=19185.
  21. Kang, H. J.(2014), Engineering education for creativity, Innovative Learning Environments for Authentic Education, 2014International Conference of Educational Technology.
  22. Kim, B. C., Ryu, K. H. & Jo, M. J.(2015), A Comparative Analysis of Creativity Education Policy in Japan and Korea, The Journal of Research in Education, 28, 105-141.
  23. Kim, D. I., Oh, H. S., Song, Y. S., Ko, E. Y., Park, S. M. & Jeong, E. H.(2009), Exploring students' core competencies in higher education from professors' perspectives: A case study of Seoul National University, Asian Journal of Education, 10(2), 195-214.
  24. Kim, J. I.(2015), Design Thinking Education in d.School, Korea Digital Design Council, 15(4), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.17280/jdd.2015.15.1.010
  25. Kim, Y. S.(2017), 4th Industrial Revolution and Educational innovation, Kookje, P.29.
  26. Kim, K. J., Kim, A. Y. & Cho, S. H.(1997), Conceptualization of creative problem solving for the development of curriculum for school subjects, The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 15(2), 129-153.
  27. Kim, M. Y.(2014), Case Study of Problem-Based Learning In International Business Culture Class, The Korean Research Association for the Business Education, 28(6), 1-23.
  28. Kim, Y. J. & Noh, B. S.(2012), A Study of Entrepreneurship Education Effect on the Self-Leadership and Entrepreneurship, Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(6), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2012.10.6.023
  29. Koehler, M. J.(2002), Designing case-based hypermedia for developing understanding of children's mathematical reasoning, Cognition and Instruction, 20(2), 151-195. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2002_2
  30. Kolb, D. A.(2014), Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, FT press.
  31. Korea Education Development Institute(2017), Creative education, Retrieved from http://edzine.kedi.re.kr.
  32. Lee, B. M. & Lee, W. H.(2013), A Study on regional development characteristics through creative university, The Geographical Journal of Korea, 47(2), 201-216.
  33. Lee, E. S.(2011), Future Strategies for Cultivating Creative Talent in Higher Education, Fifth Expert Comprehensive Forum on 21st Century Creative Talent Development Strategy, Korea Educational Development Institute.
  34. Lee, I. H.(2012), University Fusion Culture Course for the Development of Creativity Development Research Result Report(RR2012-17-398), Korea National Institut for General Education.
  35. Lee, J. S. & Eun, J. H.(2012), A Study of Open Collaboration Creative Thinking System Based on Design Thinking, Korea Digital Design Council, 12(3), 179-190.
  36. Lee, K. H. & Lew, K. H.(2014), The Effect of Creativity and Personality Education on the Elementary, Middle, and High School Students, The Journal of Creativity Education, 14, 1-16.
  37. Lee, M. N., Lee, H. S. & Choe, I. S.(2012), A Study on awareness of university students about creativity education depending on major field, The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(3), 353-376. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.30.3.201209.015
  38. Mayer, R. E.(1992), Thinking, problem solving, cognition, WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt &Co.
  39. OECD(2013a), The OECD's Contribution on Education to the Post-2015 Framework: PISA for development, OECD and Post-2015 Reflections series, OECD, Paris.
  40. Park, I. S. & Kang, S. H.(2011), Science Teachers' Perceptions on Scientific and Creative Problem Solving, Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 31(2), 314-327.
  41. Park, K. S.(2014), Teaching-Learning Model of Convergence Project Based on Team Teaching in Engineering Education, Journal of Engineering Education Research, 17(2), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2014.17.2.11
  42. Park, M. J.(2007), Learning Experience of Graduate Students through Project-based Instruction, The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 225(3), 265-288.
  43. Park, S. H. & Seol, B. M.(2014), Case study on startup consulting with students of entrepreneuship graduate and undergraduate: Entrepreneurship training and consulting program using action learning, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.9.1.201402.25
  44. Rue, S. Y.(2016), Colin Bailey Vice President of the University of Manchester, UK "Creativity can not be taught", Chosun.com.
  45. Rue, S. W. & Kim, N. Y.(2012), Report on the Actual Situation Analysis of Creative, Auditor Researcher. Audit and Inspection Research Institute.
  46. Shane, S.(2000), Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities, Organization science, 11(4), 448-469. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.448.14602
  47. Singapore Insititute of Management(2017), Problem solving, Retrieved from http://www.sim.edu.sg/Pages/index.aspx.
  48. Singh, R. P.(1998), Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition through social networks (Doctoral dissertation).
  49. The University of Sydney(2017), Problem solving, Retrieved from http://sydney.edu.au/courses/uos.
  50. Timmons, J. A.(1994), New Venture Creation, Irwin, Boston,MA.
  51. Yang, S. Y.(2005), Education system, which is the source of competitiveness in Singapore, International Area Information, 145, 4-7.
  52. Yoon, S. J.(2006), Effects of case design method in Web-case based learning environment, The Korea Journal of Education Methodology Studies, 18, 201-219.
  53. York, J. G. & Venkataraman, S.(2010), The entrepreneur-environment nexus: Uncertainty, innovation, and allocation, Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 449-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.007
  54. Young English Education Center in Australia(2017), The Sydney University, Retrieved from http://www.koreaneducentreinuk.org/%EC%98%81%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%90%EC%9C%A1/%EC%98%81%EA%B5%AD-%EA%B5%90%EC%9C%A1%EC%A0%95%EB%B3%B4/?pageid=3&uid=101&mod=document.
  55. 최식인(2007), 현행 경제교육의 문제점해결을 위한 창의성 교육 방안, 사회과교육, 46(2), 77-93.