Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management

한국건설관리학회 (Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Practical Approach for Pavement Treatment Decisions for Local Agencies

  • 발행 : 2017.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Most local agencies such as counties and small cities continuously express difficulties in making technically and financially defensible decisions on their pavement infrastructure maintenance and rehabilitation. Unlike pavement systems managed by state highway agencies, the total lane-miles of many local pavements are significantly short and they are managed by a limited number of staff who typically have multiple responsibilities. Most local agencies also do not have historical pavement performance data and the lack of a systematic decision making framework exacerbates the problem. A structured framework and an easily accessible decision support tool that reflects their local requirements, practices and operational conditions would greatly assist them in making consistent and defensible decisions. This study fills this gap by developing a systematic pavement treatment selection framework and a spreadsheet based tool for local agencies. It is expected that the proposed framework will significantly help local agencies to improve their pavement asset management practices at the project level.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. American Society of Civil Engineers, "2015 Report Card for America's Infrastructure", , 2015.
  2. American Society of Civil Engineers, "2015 Report Card A Call to Action for Iowa's Infrastructure", , 2015.
  3. Federal Highway Administration, "Asset Management Overview" Report FHWA-IF-08-008. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2007.
  4. Illinois Department of Transportation, "Pavement Preservatio, Chapter 52" Bureau of Design & Environment Manual. Springfield, IL, 2010.
  5. California Department of Transportation, "Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Volume I - Flexible Pavement Preservation Second Edition" , 2009.
  6. C. Jahren, D. Smith, and C. Plymesser, "Thin Maintenance Surfaces for Municipalities", Center for Transportation Research and Education, IHRB Project TR-507/CTRE Project 03-161, Ames, IA, 2007.
  7. A. Tavakoli, M. Lapin, and J. Figueroa, "PMSC: Pavement management system for small communities," Transportation, vol. 118, no.2. pp 270-280, 1992.
  8. H. Lee and R. Deighton, "Developing infrastructure management systems for small public agency," Infrastructure systems, vol. 1, no.4. pp 230-235, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1995)1:4(230)
  9. W. Cottrell, S. Bryan, and B. Chilukuri, "Transportation Infrastructure Maintenance Management: Case Study of a Small Urban City", Infrastructure systems, vol. 15, no.2. pp 120-132, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2009)15:2(120)
  10. Utah Department of Transportation, "Pavement Preservation Manual-Part 3", Utah, 2009.
  11. C. Vasquez, K. Heaslip, and M. Langford, "An Alternative Pavement Management System Approach for Local Governments", Proceedings of the 90th Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, USA, No. 11-2691, pp 2011.
  12. M. Ebeling and J. Bittner, "Managing low-volume roads with Wisconsin information system for local roads", Transportation Research Record, pp 277-283, 2007.
  13. F. Silva, T. Van Dam, and W. Bulleit, "Proposed pavement performance models for local government agencies in Michigan", Transportation Research Record, pp 81-86, 2000.
  14. A. Wolters, K. Zimmerman, K. Schattler and A. Rietgraf "Implementing Pavement Management Systems for Local Agencies-State-of-the-Art/State-of-the-Practice Synthesis" FHWA-ICT-11-094, 2011.
  15. R. Douglas, "Appropriate pavement maintenance and rehabilitation management system for local governments", Transportation Research Record, pp 206-212, 2011.
  16. R. Hicks and J. Moulthrop, "Selecting a preventive maintenance treatment for flexible pavements", Transportation Research Record, 1999.
  17. Michigan Department of Transportation, "Capital Preventive Maintenance", 2003.
  18. Minnesota Department of Transportation, , (2012a).
  19. Minnesota Department of Transportation, , 2012b.
  20. South Dakota Department of Transportation, "Pavement Preservation Guidelines", 2010.
  21. J. Miller and W. Bellinger, "Distress identification manual for the long-term pavement performance program", 2003.
  22. D. Pittenger, D. Gransberg, and M. Zaman, "Life-Cycle Cost-Based Pavement Preservation Treatment Design", Transportation Research Record, pp 28-35, 22011.
  23. D. Peshkin, T. Hoerner, and K. Zimmerman, "Optimal timing of pavement preventive maintenance treatment applications", Vol. 253, Transportation Research Board, 2004.
  24. Villacre J, "Pavement Life-Cycle Cost Studies Using Actual Data Cost-A Synthesis", Asphalt Pavement Alliance, 2005.
  25. California Department of Transportation, "Framework for Treatment Selection" Caltrans Division of Maintenance, Sacramento, CA, 2003.
  26. T. Saaty, "How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process", Operational Research, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 9-26, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  27. M. Akarte, N. Surendra, and B. Ravi, "Web based casting supplier evaluation using analytical hierarchy process", Operational Research Society, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 511-522, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601124
  28. C. Muralidharan and N. Anantharaman, "A multi-criteria group decision-making model for supplier rating", Supply chain Management, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 22-33, 2002.