The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제9권3호
  • /
  • Pages.200-207
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigations on the effects of mouthrinses on the colour stability and surface roughness of different dental bioceramics

  • Soygun, Koray (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cumhuriyet University) ;
  • Varol, Osman (Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University) ;
  • Ozer, Ali (Department of Metallurgy and Material Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Cumhuriyet University) ;
  • Bolayir, Giray (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cumhuriyet University)
  • 투고 : 2016.09.20
  • 심사 : 2017.03.21
  • 발행 : 2017.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. In this study, three bioceramic materials, [IPS Empress CAD (Ivoclar), IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar), and Lava Ultimate CAD (3M ESPE)] were treated with three commercial mouthrinses [Listerine, Tantum Verde, and Klorhex]; and changes in colour reflectance and surface roughness values were then quantitatively assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred and twenty ceramic samples, with dimensions of $2{\times}12{\times}14mm$, were prepared and divided into nine sample groups, except three control samples. The samples were immersed in the mouthrinse solutions for 120 hrs, and changes in colour reflectance and surface roughness values were measured by UV light spectrophotometry (Vita Easyshade; VITA Zahnfabrik) and by profilometer device (MitutoyoSurftest SJ-301), respectively. The change of surface roughness was inspected by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). RESULTS. There was a positive correlation between the ${\Delta}E$ and increase in the surface roughness. Two of the ceramic materials, IPS Empress and Lava Ultimate, were affected significantly by the treatment of the mouthrinse solutions (P<.05). The most affecting solution was Tantum Verde and the most affected material was Lava Ultimate. As expected, the most resistant material to ${\Delta}E$ and chemical corrosion was IPS e max CAD among the materials used. CONCLUSION. This work implied that mouthrinse with lower alcohol content had less deteriorating effect on colour and on the surface morphology of the bioceramic materials.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. McLean JW. Evolution of dental ceramics in the twentieth century. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:61-6. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.112545
  2. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:18-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90413-8
  3. Myers ML, Ergle JW, Fairhurst CW, Ringle RD. Fatigue failure parameters of IPS-Empress porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:549-53.
  4. Probster L, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Kirchner E, Kanjantra P. In vitro evaluation of a glass-ceramic restorative material. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:636-45. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00560.x
  5. Chai J, Takahashi Y, Sulaiman F, Chong K, Lautenschlager EP. Probability of fracture of all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:420-4.
  6. 3M ESPE. Lava Ultimate CAD/CAM restorative technical product profile. St. Paul; MN: 3M Espe Dental products;2011.
  7. Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC, Blatz MB. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: a review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:382-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12100
  8. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997;13:258-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3
  9. Lu H, Roeder LB, Lei L, Powers JM. Effect of surface roughness on stain resistance of dental resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17:102-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00094.x
  10. Fischman SL. A clinician's perspective on antimicrobial mouthrinses. J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125:20S-22S.
  11. Festuccia MS, Garcia Lda F, Cruvinel DR, Pires-De-Souza Fde C. Color stability, surface roughness and microhardness of composites submitted to mouthrinsing action. J Appl Oral Sci 2012;20:200-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000200013
  12. Kajihara K, Hirano M, Skuja L, Hosono H. Reactivity of SiCl and SiF groups in SiO2 glass with mobile interstitial O2 and H2O molecules. J Non Cryst Solids 2007;353:514-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.10.038
  13. Ji B, Qi H, Yan K, Sun G. Catalytic actions of alkaline salts in reactions between 1,2,3,4-butanetetracarboxylicacidand cellulose: I. Anhydride formation. Cellulose 2016;23:259-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0810-0
  14. Patel SB, Gordan VV, Barrett AA, Shen C. The effect of surface finishing and storage solutions on the color stability of resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:587-94. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0246
  15. Ertas E, Guler AU, Yucel AC, Koprulu H, Guler E. Color stability of resin composites after immersion in different drinks. Dent Mater J 2006;25:371-6. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.25.371
  16. Guler AU, Yilmaz F, Kulunk T, Guler E, Kurt S. Effects of different drinks on stainability of resin composite provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:118-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.004
  17. Sadaghiani L, Wilson MA, Wilson NH. Effect of selected mouthwashes on the surface roughness of resin modified glass-ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 2007;23:325-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.024
  18. Lee YK, El Zawahry M, Noaman KM, Powers JM. Effect of mouthwash and accelerated aging on the color stability of esthetic restorative materials. Am J Dent 2000;13:159-61.
  19. Goiato MC, Nobrega AS, dos Santos DM, Andreotti AM, Moreno A. Effect of different solutions on color stability of acrylic resin-based dentures. Braz Oral Res 2014;28:1-7.
  20. Gurgan S, Onen A, Koprulu H. In vitro effects of alcoholcontaining and alcohol-free mouthrinses on microhardness of some restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:244-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1997.tb00321.x
  21. Gurdal P, Akdeniz BG, Hakan Sen B. The effects of mouthrinses on microhardness and colour stability of aesthetic restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:895-901. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00924.x
  22. Joiner A. Tooth colour: a review of the literature. J Dent 2004;32:3-12.
  23. Ruyter IE, Nilner K, Moller B. Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers. Dent Mater 1987;3:246-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80081-7
  24. Douglas RD. Color stability of new-generation indirect resins for prosthodontic application. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:166-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80008-6
  25. Gawriolek M, Sikorska E, Ferreira LF, Costa AI, Khmelinskii I, Krawczyk A, Sikorski M, Koczorowski PR. Color and luminescence stability of selected dental materials in vitro. J Prosthodont 2012;21:112-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00808.x
  26. Topcu FT, Sahinkesen G, Yamanel K, Erdemir U, Oktay EA, Ersahan S. Influence of different drinks on the colour stability of dental resin composites. Eur J Dent 2009;3:50-6.
  27. Samra AP, Pereira SK, Delgado LC, Borges CP. Color stability evaluation of aesthetic restorative materials. Braz Oral Res 2008;22:205-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242008000300003
  28. Kolbeck C, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Handel G. Discoloration of facing and restorative composites by UV-irradiation and staining food. Dent Mater 2006;22:63-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.01.021
  29. van der Burgt TP, ten Bosch JJ, Borsboom PC, Kortsmit WJ. A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:155-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90099-X
  30. Goldstein GR, Schmitt GW. Repeatability of a specially designed intraoral colorimeter. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:616-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90292-V
  31. Seghi RR. Effects of instrument-measuring geometry on colorimetric assessments of dental porcelains. J Dent Res 1990; 69:1180-3. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690051101
  32. Paul S, Peter A, Pietrobon N, Hammerle CH. Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dent Res 2002;81:578-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100815
  33. Kim-Pusateri S, Brewer JD, Davis EL, Wee AG. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:193-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60028-7
  34. Witkowski S, Yajima ND, Wolkewitz M, Strub JR. Reliability of shade selection using an intraoral spectrophotometer. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:945-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0590-3
  35. Tholt de Vasconcellos B, Miranda-Junior WG, Prioli R, Thompson J, Oda M. Surface roughness in ceramics with different finishing techniques using atomic force microscope and profilometer. Oper Dent 2006;31:442-9. https://doi.org/10.2341/05-54
  36. Kakaboura A, Fragouli M, Rahiotis C, Silikas N. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007;18:155-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0675-8
  37. Jones CS, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. Br Dent J 2004;196:42-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4810881

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of mouthrinses on color stability of monolithic zirconia and feldspathic ceramic: an in vitro study vol.17, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0419-9
  2. Shade Stability of Polymer-Infiltrated and Resin Nano Ceramics vol.12, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901814010791
  3. Study of Surface Structure Changes for Selected Ceramics Used in the CAD/CAM System on the Degree of Microbial Colonization, In Vitro Tests vol.2019, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9130806
  4. Effect of Hydrothermal Aging and Beverages on Color Stability of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Based Ceramics vol.55, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55110749
  5. Influence of Aerated Drink, Mouthwash, and Simulated Gastric Acid on the Surface Roughness of Dental Ceramics: A Comparative In Vitro Study vol.12, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_143_20
  6. Colour stability and surface properties of high‐translucency restorative materials for digital dentistry after simulated oral rinsing vol.128, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12676
  7. In Vitro Effect of Acidic Solutions and Sodium Fluoride on Surface Roughness of Two Types of CAD-CAM Dental Ceramics vol.2021, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9977993
  8. Effect of mouth rinses on optical properties of CAD‐CAM materials used for laminate veneers and crowns vol.33, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12720
  9. Evaluation of the microhardness of different resin‐based dental restorative materials treated with gastric acid: Scanning electron microscopy–energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy ana vol.84, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23769
  10. Influence of various mouthrinses on color stability and whiteness of resin‐based restorative materials vol.46, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22642