DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and performance evaluation of SB3-level roadside barrier for highway transition zone

고속국도용 SB3등급 전이구간 방호울타리 개발 및 성능평가

  • 이정휘 (단국대학교 토목환경공학과) ;
  • 조종석 (한국도로공사 도로교통연구원 품질시험센터) ;
  • 이재혁 ((주)대흥미래기술)
  • Received : 2017.07.14
  • Accepted : 2017.11.08
  • Published : 2017.12.15

Abstract

PURPOSES : In this research, an SB3-level roadside barrier for a highway transition zone that meets the newly established guide Installation and Management Guide for Roadside Safety Appurtenance is developed. Its performance is evaluated by a numerical simulation and real-scale vehicle impact test. METHODS : The commercial explicit dynamic software LS-DYNA is utilized for impact simulation. An FE model of a passenger vehicle developed and released by the National Crash Analysis Center (NCAC) at George Washington University and a heavy goods vehicle (HGV) model developed by the TC226/CM-E Work Group are utilized for impact simulation. The original vehicle models were modified to reflect the conditions of test vehicles. The impact positions of the passenger vehicle and truck to the transition guardrail were set as 1/2 and 3/4 of the transition region, respectively, according to the guide. RESULTS : Based on the numerical simulation results of the existing transition barrier, a new structural system with improved performance was suggested. According to the result of a numerical simulation of the suggested structural system, two sets of transition barriers were manufactured and installed for real-scale vehicle impact tests. The tests were performed at a test field for roadside safety hardware of the Korea Highway Corporation Research Institute. CONCLUSIONS : The results of both the real-vehicle impact tests and numerical simulations of the developed transition barrier satisfied the performance criteria, and the results of numerical simulation showed good correlation with the test results.

Keywords

References

  1. Akram, Y.A., Kim, K.M., Williams, W.F., and Patton, C. (2011). Crash wall design for mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) retaining wall - phase I: Engineering analysis and simulation, Rep. 405160-15, TTI (Texas Transportation Institute), College Station, TX.
  2. Atahan, A.O. (2016). "Crashworthiness analysis of a bridge rail-toguardrail transition," International Journal of Crashworthiness, Vol. 21, Iss. 5, pp.423-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2016.1164446
  3. Chung, C.H., Lee, J., and Gil, J.H. (2014). "Structural performance evaluation of a precast prefabricated bridge column under vehicle impact loading," Structure and Infrastructure Engineering: Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle Design and Performance, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp.777-791, DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2013.767841.
  4. Chung, C., Lee, J., and Jung, R. (2015). "Numerical simulations of missile impacts on reinforced concrete plates: IRIS-2010/2012 benchmark project," Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 295, pp.747-758, DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.04.031.
  5. Chung, C.H., Lee, J., Jung, R., and Yu, T.Y. (2016). "Assessment of Impact Resistance Performance of Post-tensioned Curved Wall using Numerical Impact Analysis," J. Comput. Struct. Eng. Inst. Korea, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp.161-167. https://doi.org/10.7734/COSEIK.2016.29.2.161
  6. Joo, J.W., Kum, K.J., Park, J.J., and Jang, D.Y. (2008). "A Study on Development & Establishment of Performance Evaluation Criteria for Guardrail End Treatments," Int. J. Highw. Eng. Vol. 10, No. 1, pp.123-134.
  7. Joo, J.W., Jang, D.Y., Ha, J.M., and Park, J.J. (2011). "Study on Improvement Method and Performance Analysis About Occupied Existing Roadside Barriers in Expressway," Int. J. Highw. Eng. Vol. 13, No. 4, pp.9-17. https://doi.org/10.7855/IJHE.2011.13.4.009
  8. Kim, D.S., Kim, K.D., Ko, M.G., and Kim, K.J. (2009). "Impact Condition of Safety Performance Evaluation for Longitudinal Barriers of SMART Highway," Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp.49-57.
  9. Kim, K.D., Ko, M.G., and Nam, M.K. (2007). "Data Processing and Numerical Procedures Influencing on Occupant Risk Indices," Int. J. Highw. Eng. Vol. 9 No. 4, pp.215-226.
  10. Kim, K.D., Ko, M.G., Kim, D.S., Joo, J.W., and Jang, D.Y. (2016). "Strategy to increase the speed of a small car impact to a semi-rigid barrier designed for high impact severity," International Journal of Crashworthiness, Vol. 21, Iss. 4, pp. 310-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2016.1175052
  11. Korea Expressway Corporation Research Institute (KECRI) (2015). Computer Simulation of Bridge Rail-to-Guardrail Transition (SB3 Level), Road Kinematics Inc.
  12. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT) (2013). Study on Standard Drawings of End Treatment & Transition Zone for Roadside Safety Features, Road Kinematics Inc.
  13. LSTC (2012). LS-DYNA Keyword User's Manual, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, California.
  14. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MLIT) (2012). Installation and Management Guide for Roadside Safety Features.
  15. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MLIT) (2013). Handbook of Real-Scale Structure Impact Test for Roadside Safety Features.
  16. NCAC (2012). Public Finite Element Model Archive, National Crash Analysis Center(www.ncac.gwu.deu), Washington, D.C.
  17. Noh, M.H., and Lee, S.Y. (2016). "Truck Crash Performance Evaluation of Guardrails Made of PosMac Steels Considering the Ground Bearing Capacity Effect," J. Korean Soc. Adv. Comp. Struc. Vol. 7, No. 4, pp.62-67. https://doi.org/10.11004/kosacs.2016.7.4.062
  18. Park, K.S., Noh, M.H., and Lee, J. (2014). "Impact performance evaluation of MASH TL4 bridge barrier," International Journal of Crashworthiness, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp.624-638, DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2014.937558.