Journal of Ecology and Environment

The Ecological Society of Korea (한국생태학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Possibility of applying unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and mapping software for the monitoring of waterbirds and their habitats

  • Han, Yong-Gu (Institute of Plant Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Yoo, Seung Hwa (Environmental Impact Assessment Team, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Kwon, Ohseok (Institute of Plant Medicine, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2017.04.29
  • Accepted : 2017.05.12
  • Published : 2017.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Conventional bird observation methods are line survey or point count method by bare eyes or through binoculars or telescopes. But in this study, the possibility of monitoring waterbirds using drones beyond the conventional research methods was explored. It also describes the direction of producing and accumulating images of waterbird habitats as a method to efficiently determine changes in waterbird habitats. Results: From the study, it was concluded that waterbird monitoring using drones was a new monitoring technique which could be applied to the field and 26 kinds of waterbirds were observed. In the case of a drone with a single lens, it was difficult to identify objects because the size of the subject was too small at a certain altitude. In this case, zoom lens can be an alternative. It has also been verified that image analysis software can be used to accumulate images of waterbird habitats. Conclusions: If various kinds of advanced drones and cameras are used, it would be possible to monitor larger areas including the areas that are difficult for human access and to observe more waterbirds and wider habitats.

Keywords

References

  1. Bernard, J. M., & Tuttle, R. W. (1998). Stream corridor restoration: priciple, processes, and practices. In D. Hayes (Ed.), Engineering approaches to ecosystm restoration (pp. 320-325). American Society of Civil Engineers.
  2. Bibby, C. J., Burgess, N. D., Hill, D. A., & Mustoe, S. H. (2000). Bird census technique. London: Academic.
  3. Christie, K. S., Gilbert, S. L., Brown, C. L., Hatfield, M., & Hanson, L. (2016). Unmanned aircraft systems in wildlife research: current and future applications of a transformative technology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14, 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1281
  4. Hodgson, J. C., Baylis, S. M., Mott, R., Herrod, A. H., & Clarke, R. H. (2016). Precision wildlife monitoring using unmanned aerial vehicles. Scientific Reports, 6, 22574. doi:10.1038/srep22574.
  5. Ivosevic, B., Han, Y.-G., Cho, Y., & Kwon, O. (2015). The use of conservation drones in ecology and wildlife research. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 38, 113-118. https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2015.012
  6. Ivosevic, B., Han, Y.-G., & Kwon, O. (2017). Monitoring butterflies with an unmanned aerial vehicle: current possibilities and future potentials. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 41, 12. doi:10.1186/s41610-017-0028-1.
  7. Jones, G. P., Pearlstine, L. G., & Percival, H. F. (2006). An assessment of small unmanned aerial vehicles for wildlife research. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34, 750-758. https://doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[750:AAOSUA]2.0.CO;2
  8. Kang, J. H., & Hahm, K. H. (1997). The birds of the Upo wetland. The Korean Journal of Ornithology, 4, 35-46.
  9. Kim, S. K. (2001). An analysis of Avifauna and community structure of waterbirds at Woopo wetland, Prov. Kyung-nam. MS Thesis, Kyungpook National University, Daegu.
  10. Koh, L. P., & Wich, S. A. (2012). Dawn of drone ecology: low-cost autonomous aerial vehicles for conservation. Tropical Conservation Science, 5, 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291200500202
  11. Lee, S. J., & Choi, Y. S. (2015). Topographic survey at small-scale open-pit mines using a popular rotary-wing unmanned aerial vehicle (drone). Tunnel & Underground Space, 25, 462-469. https://doi.org/10.7474/TUS.2015.25.5.462
  12. Linchant, J., Lisein, J., Semeki, J., Lejeune, P., & Vermeulen, C. (2015). Are unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) the future of wildlife monitoring? A review of accomplishments and challenges. Mammal Review, 45, 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12046
  13. Sarda-Palomera, F., Bota, G., Vinolo, C., Pallares, O., Sazatornil, V., Brotons, L., Gomariz, S., & Sarda, F. (2012). Fine‐scale bird monitoring from light unmanned aircraft systems. Ibis, 154, 177-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2011.01177.x
  14. Siebert, S., & Teizer, J. (2014). Mobile 3D mapping for surveying earthwork projects using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) system. Automation in Construction, 41, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.01.004

Cited by

  1. Drone Monitoring of Breeding Waterbird Populations: The Case of the Glossy Ibis vol.2, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/drones2040042
  2. Drones for Conservation in Protected Areas: Present and Future vol.3, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/drones3010010
  3. Unoccupied Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Marine Ecosystem Restoration vol.7, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00438
  4. Drone Image Segmentation Using Machine and Deep Learning for Mapping Raised Bog Vegetation Communities vol.12, pp.16, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12162602
  5. Validating an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Approach to Survey Colonial Waterbirds vol.43, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1675/063.043.0304
  6. Networked Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Surveillance and Monitoring: A Survey vol.13, pp.7, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13070174
  7. Review of Some Applications of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Technology in the Resource-Rich Country vol.11, pp.21, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110171