한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육 (Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education)

  • 제36권2호
  • /
  • Pages.163-179
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1598-3099(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8436(eISSN)
한국초등과학교육학회 (The Korean Elementary Science Education Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

초등학교 과학 교과서의 거꾸로 수업 활용 가능성에 대한 교사들의 인식 - 한국과 싱가포르 교과서 비교 연구 -

Elementary Teachers' Conceptions about Applicability of Science Textbooks for Flipped Learning - Comparative Study of Korean and Singaporean Textbooks -

  • 투고 : 2017.04.17
  • 심사 : 2017.05.28
  • 발행 : 2017.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study is to examine whether elementary science textbooks in Korea and Singapore are applicable to flipped learning. By comparative study we sought to identifying appropriate features of science textbooks for learner-centered teaching. We analyzed text pages on the unit of 'Working of electricity' in Korean elementary science textbook for sixth grade and three chapters of 'Electric circuits, Using electricity, Conductors of electricity' in Singaporean elementary textbook, 'Science : My pals are here!'. We designed evaluating frameworks for science textbooks based on the four pillars of flipped learning. and applied it to 10 elementary teachers evaluate two textbooks. They evaluated textbooks with Likert Scale items and wrote detailed statements and exemplars about their choices. We analyzed the teachers' evaluative descriptions inductively and chose commonly mentioned characteristics. Based on the analysis, we got to the conclusion about specific features of two elementary science textbooks in terms of flexible environment, learning culture, intentional contents, and teachers' expertises. Implications for improving science textbooks towards flipped learning and learner-centered teaching through comparative study were discussed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bergmann, J. & Sams, A (2012). Flip your classroom: Research every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.
  2. Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M. & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. (pp. 17-66). Dordrecht: Springer.
  3. Boyd, S. & Watson, V. (2006). Shifting the frame: Exploring integration of the Key Competencies at six normal schools. New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Education Research.
  4. Choi, Y. & Lee, H. (2012). The analysis on patterns of questions in elementary school science textbooks under the 2007 revised curriculum. Kyungpook National University Science Education Research Institute, Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2012.36.1.120
  5. Flipped Learning Network (FLN). (2014). The four pillars of $FLIP^{TM}$. Retrieved April 13, 2017 from http://flippedlearning.org/definition-of-flipped-learning
  6. Gordon, J., Halasz, G., Krawczyk, M., Leney, T., Michel, A., Pepper, D., Putkiewicz, E. & Wisniewski, J. (2009). Key competences in Europe: Opening doors for lifelong learners across the school curriculum and teacher education. Warsaw: CASE.
  7. Hamdan, N., McKnight, P. E., McKnight, K. & Arfstrom, K. M. (2013). The flipped learning model: A white paper based on the literature review titled a review of flipped learning. Retrieved April 13, 2017 from: http://flippedlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/WhitePaper_FlippedLearning.pdf
  8. Hann, A., Lee., H. (2001). The effect of science reading program on science learning in elementary school. Gyeongin National University of Education, Science Education Research Institute, Collection of Science Education treatises[과학교육논총], 13, 159-178.
  9. Jang, K. & Lee, J. (2009). An analysis of perceptions of learner-centered education by administrators, in-service teachers, and pre-service teachers. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 9(1), 315-339.
  10. Jarvis, W., Halvorson, W., Sadeque, S. & Johnston, S. (2014). A Large Class Engagement (LCE) model based on Service-Dominant Logic (SDL) and flipped classrooms. Education Research and Perspectives, 41, 1-24.
  11. Jeong, J., Bae, J. & So, K. (2015). The effect of flipped learning of elementary science class on learning motivation and academic achievement of elementary students. Biology Education, 43(4), 333-343. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2015.43.4.333
  12. Jung, H. & Jhun, Y. (2012). A comparative study on physics inquiry activities in science textbooks for primary school in Korea and Singapore. Kyungpook National University Science Education Research Institute, Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2012.36.1.139
  13. Kang, S., Seok, J. & Koh, H. (2013). Teachers' and students' perceptions of the reading materials in elementary school science textbooks. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(3), 315-326.
  14. Kim, D. (2015). The utilization and prospects of textbooks in instruction and evaluation in Korean education. Research of Educational Innovation[교육혁신연구], 25(3), 21-44.
  15. Kim, J., Yoon, H., Hwang, H., Lee, S. & Park, S. (1998). Seoul: A study on the development of school textbook model. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Education. RRC 98-8.
  16. Kim, K. (2002). Primary teachers' views about the workbook Experiment & observation and its practical usage. (Unpublished master's thesis). Chuncheon National University of Education.
  17. Kim, M. & Shin, C. (2016). The effects of flipped classroom on middle school learners' English academic achievement and affective domains. Kyungpook National University Secondary Institute of Education, Secondary Education Research, 64(2), 451-480. https://doi.org/10.25152/ser.2016.64.2.451
  18. Kwon, C. & Jung, E. (2011). Teachers' cognitions about the primary science textbooks(Experiment and Observation) and it's improvement in science classes. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 4(1), 12-19.
  19. Lage, M., Platt, G. & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480009596759
  20. Lee, K., Kim, K., Kim, S., Kim, H., Lee, M., Lee, S. & Lee, I. (2013). Improvement plan of the subject curriculum based on the key competencies-focusing on the alignment of curriculum, teaching.learning methods and educational assessment. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Education. RRC 2013-2.
  21. Lee, J. & Kim, I. (2015). The educational performance of the flipped class based on the competency-based educational model. Kyungpook National University Secondary Institute of Education, Secondary Education Research, 63(4), 505-538. https://doi.org/10.25152/ser.2015.63.4.505
  22. Luke, A. & McArdle, F. (2009). A model for researchbased state professional development policy. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660802616401
  23. Marshall Cavendish Education (2011). News & Events. http://www.marshallcavendish.com/education/contentview.aspx?article_id=168
  24. Na, J. & Song, J. (2014). Elementary teachers' perception, practice, and background factors in using students' everyday experience in teaching science. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 34(7), 635-645. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.7.0635
  25. OECD (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary. OECD: DE\eSeCo Project. Retrieved April 13, 2017 from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf
  26. Park, J. & Kwon, H. (2007). Analysis of questions in the "Matter" units of elementary science textbooks under the 7th curriculum. Journal of Korean Elemen- tary Science Education, 26(4), 551-557.
  27. Ryu, S. & Kim, E. (2014). Debates on the definition of learning-oriented flipped learning for class innovation. The Journal of Education Assignment Institute, 20(1), 67-80.
  28. Shin, Y., Ha, J., Hong, J., Jhun, Y., Lee, S. Y., Park, J., Ji, J, Lee, S. A., Moon, H. & Lee, S. H. (2016c). A study on the development of science textbooks for the implementation of flipped learning. Journal of Science Education, 40(1), 90-102. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2016.40.1.90
  29. Shin, Y., Ha, J. & Lee, S. (2016b). An analysis of the perceptions and difficulties experienced by science teachers in flipped learning. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 34(7), 635-645.
  30. Shin, Y., Kim, J., Lee, S. & Ha, J. (2016a). An exploration on the effects of elementary school science class applied flipped learning in the life domain. Biology Education, 44(1), 60-71. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2016.44.1.60
  31. Sosniak, L. (2001). The 9% challenge: Education in school and society. Retrieved May 14, 2013 from http://www.tcrecord.org
  32. Stern, L., & Roseman, J. E. (2004). Can middle school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum evaluation study: Life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538-568. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20019
  33. Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.