Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회지)

Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Case Study for the Reorganization of the Standard of Government Function Classification (BRM): Focusing on the 'Cultural Heritage' Policy Area

정부기능분류체계(BRM)의 재정비를 위한 사례연구 - '문화재' 정책영역을 중심으로 -

  • 남서진 (명지대학교 기록정보과학전문대학원) ;
  • 임진희 (정보인권연구소)
  • Received : 2017.04.21
  • Accepted : 2017.05.24
  • Published : 2017.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigated the administrative history, from the introduction of the "Standard of Government Function Classification" (BRM) to its development and application. Through the results of the survey, the causes of the problems observed in the current government's functional classification system were revealed. The current survey examined the functional classification scheme of the central government and local governments on the "cultural heritage" policy area (9 major functions, 59 middle functions, 297 small functions, and 1,287 unit tasks). It confirmed the problem of the separation of functions between central and local governments as well as other problems. Among the problems, this study proposed an improvement model through four representative cases such as the "designation of cultural heritage." In order to reorganize the "Standard of Government Function Classification," it is necessary to design a business function with the reproduction of tasks, establish a system for management and operation in order to maintain the consistency of the business function, educate users, and suggest continuous improvement.

본 연구는, 문헌조사를 바탕으로 대한민국의 업무참조모델(BRM)인 '정부기능분류체계'의 도입에서 개발 적용에 이르기까지의 행정연혁을 통하여, 정부기능분류체계의 본래 개발목적과 의도를 밝혀내고, 현재 정부기능분류체계에서 관찰되는 문제점과의 관계를 밝힘으로써 현행에서 드러나는 정부기능분류체계의 문제에 대한 원인을 찾아보고자 하였다. 정부기능분류체계의 현황조사는 정책영역 '문화재' 영역(대기능 9개, 중기능 59개, 소기능 297개와 단위과제 1,287개)을 대상으로 중앙정부와 지방정부의 기능분류체계를 조사하였다. 그 결과, 중앙정부와 지방정부의 기능 간에 분절된 현상과 그밖에 문제점들을 발견하였고, 이를 대표하는 '문화재 지정' 등의 4가지 사례를 통해 개선모형을 제안하였다. 또한, '정부기능분류체계'의 재정비를 위하여, 업무재현성을 갖춘 업무기능의 설계, 업무기능의 일관성유지를 위한 관리와 운영에 있어서의 제도마련, 이용자의 사용촉진을 위한 교육, 지속적인 유지관리와 개선이 필요함을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강근복 (2002). 미국의 전자정부: 성과와 교훈. 사회과학연구, 13, 1-21.(Kang, Geunbok (2002). The United States' E-Government: Performance and its lessons. The Journal of Social Science, 13, 1-21.)
  2. 김석주 (2003). 전자정부와 행정개혁. 서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집, 18-39.(Kim, Suk-Ju (2003). E-government and administrative reform. Paper presented at the meeting of the Seoul Association for Public Administration, 18-39.)
  3. 김화경, 김은주 (2014). BRM운영을 위한 단위과제 정비방안. 한국기록관리학회지, 14(4), 199-219.(Kim, Hwa-Kyoung & Kim, Eun-Ju (2014). Business Transaction Preparation Plan for Business Reference Model Management. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 14(4), 199-219.) https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2014.14.4.199
  4. 대통령자문 정책기획위원회 (2008a). 온-나라(On-nara) 정부업무관리시스템. 서울: 대통령자문정책기획의원회.(Presidential Advisory Policy Planning Committee (2008a). On-nara Government business management system. Seoul: Presidential Advisory Policy Planning Committee.)
  5. 대통령자문 정책기획의원회 (2008b). 전자정부시스템의 구축. 서울: 대통령자문정책기획의원회.(Presidential Advisory Policy Planning Committee (2008b). Construction of e-government system.)
  6. 대통령자문 정책기획의원회 (2008c). 정부조직과 기능의 효율적 운영과 관리. 서울: 대통령자문정책기획의원회.(Presidential Advisory Policy Planning Committee (2008c). Efficient operation and management of government organizations and functions. Seoul: Presidential Advisory Policy Planning Committee.)
  7. 문찬일 (2016). 기초지방자치단체 기능분류체계(BRM)의 단위과제 구축사례- 서울특별시 강북구 사례를 중심으로. 기록학연구, 49, 247-275.(Moon, Chan-il (2016). A Construction Case of BRM 'Danwigwaje' in Basic Local Governments: Focussing on Gangbuk District of Seoul Special City. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 49, 247-275.)
  8. 설문원 (2013a). 단위과제 기반 공공기록물 평가제도의 문제점과 개선방안. 한국기록관리학회지, 13(3), 231-254.(Seol, Moon-won (2013a). A Study on Problems of the Public Records Appraisal System Based on the Value of 'Business Transaction' and Application of a Multi-appraisal Model. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 13(3), 231-254.) https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2013.13.3.231
  9. 설문원 (2013b). 기록분류를 위한 정부기능분류체계의 적용구조 및 운용분석: 중앙 행정기관을 중심으로. 한국비블리아학회지, 24(4), 23-51.(Seol, Moon-won (2013b). An Analysis of the Application Framework of the Business Reference Model to Records Classification Schemes in Korean Central Government Agencies. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 24(4), 23-51.) https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2013.24.4.023
  10. 소프트웨어정책연구소 (2016). 공공기관 공통SW의 파급효과 분석: 온나라시스템 사례연구.(Software Policy Institute (2016). Analysis of the effect of common SW in public institutions: A case study on the whole country system.)
  11. 신동익, 이석준, 신신애 (2012). 엔터프라이즈 아키텍처 개요. 서울: 에프앤가이드.(Shin, Dong-Ik, Lee, Seok-Jun, & Shin Shin-Ae (2012). Enterprise architecture overview. Seoul: FnGuide.)
  12. 신동익, 이우기 (2009). 업무참조모델(BRM) 수립 방법론의 범정부 적용준거. 정보기술아키텍처연구, 6(1), 29-41.(Shin, Dong-Ik & Lee, Woo-Key (2009). Methodologies and Establishment for Business Reference Model. The Journal of Information Technology and Architecture, 6(1), 29-41.)
  13. 신익호, 박정은 (2004). BRM(BusinessReferenceModel)을 활용한 정부기능연계모형과 성공적인 전자정부 추진과의 관계. 정보과학회지, 22(11), 88-103.(Sin, Ik-ho & Park, Jung-Eun (2004). A Study on Relations between Successful Implementation of e-and Collaborated functions model for Government in Korea using Business Reference Model. Communications of the Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineer, 22(11), 88-103.)
  14. 양순애 (2007). 전자정부사업 분석 및 전략적 추진방향 중앙과 지방의 정부기능분류체계 관점에서. 한국지역정보화학회지, 10(2), 89-120.(Yang, Soon-Ae (2007). Analysis and strategic direction of e-government business: From the perspective of central and local government functional classification systems. Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 10(2), 89-120.)
  15. 양순애 (2008). 특집: 알기쉬운 EA 해설 및 구축사례; 지방자치단체 BRM(정부기능분류체계)의 이해. 지역정보화, 51(단일호), 28-37.(Yang, Soon-Ae (2008). Special Feature: Easy-to-understand EA commentary and implementation examples; Understanding of Local Government BRM (Government Functional Classification System). Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 51, 28-37.)
  16. 엄석진 (2008). 전자정부 추진결과의 제도적 결정요인. 한국행정학회 학술발표논문집, 103-133.(Eom, Seok-Jin (2008). Institutional determinants of e-government promotion results. Paper presented at the meeting of the Korean Association for Public Administration, 103-133.)
  17. 오강탁, 이연우 (2005). 참여정부 전자정부 수준과 향후 추진 전략. 한국행정학회 학술발표논문집, 27-48.(Oh, Gang-tak & Lee, Yeon-Woo (2005). E-government level of participating government and future implementation strategy. Paper presented at the meeting of the Korean Association for Public Administration, 27-48.)
  18. 유영필 (2007). 업무기능분석과 기록관리도구의 개발. 석사학위논문. 명지대학교 기록과학대학원, 기록관리학과.(Yoo, Young-pil (2007). A Study of the Business Process Analysis and Classification Tools for Records Management. Unpublished master's thesis. University of Myongji, The Graduate School of Archival Science, Seoul, Korea.)
  19. 유홍림, 윤상오 (2006). 전자정부 추진과정에서 부처간 갈등 분석. 한국정책과학학회보, 10(4), 397-420.(Yoo, Hong-Lim & Yun, Sang-Oh (2006). Analysis of conflict between ministries in e-government promotion process. Koream Policy Sciences Review, 10(4), 397-420.)
  20. 이세진, 김화경 (2016). BRM 정비를 통한 기록관리기준표 개선사례. 기록학연구, 50, 273-309.(Lee, Se-Jin & Kim Hwa-Kyoung (2016). A Case Study on Improvement of Records ManagementReference Table by Reorganizing BRM: The case of Reorganization of Seoul's BRM andRecords Management Reference Table. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 50, 273-309.)
  21. 이승준 (2008). 한국EA상에서의 기록관리프로파일의 도출. 석사학위논문. 한국외국어대학교대학원, 정보.기록관리학과.(Lee, Seung-Jun (2008). The records management profile on the Korean E-government enterprise architecture (EA): Refer to the U.S. federal enterprise architecture (FEA) records management profile. Unpublished master's thesis. Hankook University of Foreign Studies, The Graduate School of Information and Records Management, Seoul, Korea.)
  22. 이주연 (2006). 정부기능연계모델(Business Reference Model) 분류체계와 기록분류체계의 통합방안. 한국기록관리학회 학술발표논문집, 43-60.(Lee, Ju-Yeon (2006). Government function linkage model (Business Reference Model) Classification and record classification system integration method. Paper presented at the meeting of the Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 43-60.)
  23. 이희준, 정연경 (2016). 지방자치단체 기록관리기준표의 개선방안에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 27(1), 5-25.(Lee, Hui-Jun & Chung, Yeon-Kyoung (2016). A Study on Improving Records Management Standard Tables for Local Governments: Focused on the Construction and Architecture. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 27(1), 5-25.) https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2016.27.1.005
  24. 정부혁신지방분권위원회 (2003. 6. 13). 제5차 정부혁신지방분권위원회 회의록.(Government Innovation Decentralization Committee (2003. 6. 13). The 5th Government Innovation Decentralization Committee meeting minutes.)
  25. 정부혁신지방분권위원회 (2005). 참여정부의 전자정부. 정부혁신지방분권위원회 백서6. 정부혁신지방분권위원회.(Government Innovation Decentralization Committee (2005). Participating government's e-government. Government Innovation Decentralization Committee Series 6. Seoul: Government Innovation Decentralization Committee.)
  26. 정부혁신지방분권위원회 (2006). 위원회추진주요과제. 정부혁신지방분권위원회. 검색일자: 2016. 12. 13. http://innovation.pa.go.kr/policy/view.htm?id=1113&page=1&condition=&keyword=&teamcode=(Government Innovation Decentralization Committee (2006). Major tasks of the committee. Seoul: Government Innovation Decentralization Committee. Retrieved December 13, 2016, from http://innovation.pa.go.kr/policy/view.htm?id=1113&page=1&condition=&keyword=&teamcode=)
  27. 한국. 중소기업청 (2013). 업종별 업무 프로세스표준모델. 대전: 중소기업청.(Korea. Small and Medium Business Administration (2013). Standard model of business process by industry. Daejeon: Small and Medium Business Administration.)
  28. 한국. 행정자치부 (2016). 2016년 업무보고. 서울: 행정자치부. 검색일자: 2016. 12. 13. http://www.moi.go.kr/frt/bbs/type001/commonSelectBoardArticle.do?bbsId=BBSMSTR_000000000245&nttId=4881(Korea. Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs (2016). 2016 business reporting. Seoul: Ministry of the Interior. Retrieved December 13, 2016, from http://www.moi.go.kr/frt/bbs/type001/commonSelectBoardArticle.do?bbsId=BBSMSTR_000000000245&nttId=4881)
  29. 한국전산원 (2003). 정부기능연계모델 개발 및 활용에 관한 연구.(National Computerization Agency (2003). A Study on Development and Utilization of Government Functional Linkage Model.)
  30. 한국전산원 (2005). 2005년도 전자정부지원사업 재공고입찰(정부업무관리시스템 시범 적용), 2005.12.2. 참조. 나라장터 입찰공고번호: 20051201588-00.(National Computerization Agency (2005). 2005 E-government support project Re-bid announcement (Demonstration of government business management system), 2005.12.2. Bid announcement number: 20051201588-00.)
  31. 한국전산원 (2006). 2006년도 전자정부지원사업 입찰 공고(정부기능연계시스템 고도화), 2006.6.10. 참조. 나라장터 입찰공고번호: 20060606720-00.(National Computerization Agency (2006). 2006 E-government support project bid announcement (Enhancement of government function linkage system), 2006.6.10. Bid announcement number: 20060606720-00.)
  32. 한국정보사회진흥원 (2007). 2007년도 전자정부지원사업 과제 제안요청서(지방자치단체 기능분류모델(BRM) 시스템 구축사업), 한국정보사회진흥원, 2007.12.6. 참조. 나라장터 입찰공고번호: 20071204695-00.(National Information Society Agency (2007). 2007 E-government support project request for proposal (Local government functional classification model (BRM) system construction project), National Information Society Agenc, 2007.12.6. Bid announcement number: 20071204695-00.)
  33. 혁신관리비서관실 혁신관리수석실 (2005. 10). 통합행정혁신시스템 시스템 구축.(Innovation management secretary room Innovation management senior (2005. 10). Integrated administrative innovation system system construction.)
  34. 황주성, 이원태, 최선희, 신동익, 이우기 (2008). 지식정보화를 위한 아키텍처 정책 연구 - EA기반의 정부통합전산센터 발전전략 연구-. 과천: 정보통신정책연구원.(Hwang, Ju-Seong, Lee, Won-Tae, Choi, Sun-Hee, Shin, Dong-Ik, & Lee, Woo-Key (2008). Study on architecture policy for knowledge informatization - Study on Strategy for the Development of Computer Integrated Center based on EA -. Gwacheon: Information and Communication Policy Institute.)
  35. MB때 사라진 노무현의 '이지원' ... 靑, 재도입 적극 검토 (2017. 5. 18). 해럴드경제. http://news.heraldcorp.com/view.php?ud=20170518000156