References
- Metzger Z, Solomonov M, Kfir A. The role of mechanical instrumentation in the cleaning of root canals. Endod Topics 2013;29:87-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/etp.12048
- Mozo S, Llena C, Forner L. Review of ultrasonic irrigation in endodontics: increasing action of irrigating solutions. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17:e512-e516.
- Munoz HR, Camacho-Cuadra K. In vivo efficacy of three different endodontic irrigation systems for irrigant delivery to working length of mesial canals of mandibular molars. J Endod 2012;38:445-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.007
- Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Effect of smear layer against disinfection protocols on Enterococcus faecalis - infected dentin. J Endod 2013;39:1395-1400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.05.007
- Morgental RD, Singh A, Sappal H, Kopper PM, Vier-Pelisser FV, Peters OA. Dentin inhibits the antibacterial effect of new and conventional endodontic irrigants. J Endod 2013;39:406-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.10.028
- Torabinejad M, Handysides R, Khademi AA, Bakland LK. Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: a review. Oral surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;94:658-666. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.128962
- Kamel WH, Kataia EM. Comparison of the efficacy of smear clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod 2014;40:446-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.09.028
- Mancini M, Cerroni L, Iorio L, Armellin E, Conte G, Cianconi L. Smear layer removal and canal cleanliness using different irrigation systems (EndoActivator, Endovac, and passive ultrasonic irrigation): field emission scanning electron microscopic evaluation in an in vitro study. J Endod 2013;39:1456-1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.028
- Paragliola R, Franco V, Fabiani C, Mazzoni A, Nato F, Tay FR, Breschi L, Grandini S. Final rinse optimization: influence of different agitation protocols. J Endod 2010;36:282-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.004
- Jiang LM, Lak B, Eijsvogels LM, Wesselink P, Van Der Sluis LW. Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of different final irrigation techniques. J Endod 2012;38:838-841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.002
- Curtis TO, Sedgley CM. Comparison of a continuous ultrasonic irrigation device and conventional needle irrigation in the removal of root canal debris. J Endod 2012;38:1261-1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.012
- Van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. Int Endod J 2007;40:415-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01243.x
- Kato AS, Cunha RS, da Silveira Bueno CE, Pelegrine RA, Fontana CE, de Martin AS. Investigation of the efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation versus irrigation with reciprocating activation: an environmental scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod 2016;42:659-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.016
- Prado M, Gusman H, Gomes BP, Simao RA. Scanning electron microscopic investigation of the effectiveness of phosphoric acid in smear layer removal when compared with EDTA and citric acid. J Endod 2011;37:255-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.011
- Mancini M, Armellin E, Casaglia A, Cerroni L, Cianconi L. A comparative study of smear layer removal and erosion in apical intraradicular dentine with three irrigating solutions: a scanning electron microscopy evaluation. J Endod 2009;35:900-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.052
- Dai L, Khechen K, Khan S, Gillen B, Loushine BA, Wimmer CE, Gutmann JL, Pashley D, Tay FR. The effect of QMix, an experimental antibacterial root canal irrigant, on removal of canal wall smear layer and debris. J Endod 2011;37:80-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.10.004
- Aranda-Garcia AJ, Kuga MC, Vitorino KR, Chavez-Andrade GM, Duarte MA, Bonetti-Filho I, Faria G, So MV. Effect of the root canal final rinse protocols on the debris and smear layer removal and on the pushout strength of an epoxy-based sealer. Microsc Res Tech 2013;76:533-537. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22196
- Plotino G, Pameijer CH, Grande NM, Somma F. Ultrasonics in endodontics: a review of the literature. J Endod 2007;33:81-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.008
- Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006;32:389-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.014
- Prado M, Santos Junior HM, Rezende CM, Pinto AC, Faria RB, Simao RA, Gomes BP. Interactions between irrigants commonly used in endodontic practice: a chemical analysis. J Endod 2013;39:505-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.050
- Elnaghy AM. Effect of QMix irrigant on bond strength of glass fiber posts to root dentine. Int Endod J 2014;47:280-289. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12145
Cited by
- Micro-CT evaluation of different final irrigation protocols on the removal of hard-tissue debris from isthmus-containing mesial root of mandibular molars pp.1436-3771, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2483-1
- Smear layer removal by passive ultrasonic irrigation and 2 new mechanical methods for activation of the chelating solution vol.46, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e11