참고문헌
- 마민영.신재홍(2016). 대수 문장제의 해결에서 드러나는 중등 영재 학생간의 공변추론 수준 비교 및 분석. 학교수학, 18(1), 43-59.
- 박선화.변희현.주미경(2011). 중학교 학생의 수학과 학습 특성 연구. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRI 2011-5.
- 변희현.주미경(2012). 우리나라 중학생의 함수 개념화 특성. 수학교육학연구, 22(3), 353-370.
- 손홍찬.류희찬(2005). 함수 지도와 수학적 모델링 활동에서 스프레드시트의 활용. 수학교육학연구, 15(4), 505-522.
- 이광상.조민식.류희찬(2006). 엑셀의 활용이 일차함수 문제해결에 미치는 효과. 학교수학, 8(3), 265-290.
- 이종희.김부미(2003). 교수학적 처방에 따른 중학생들의 일차함수 오개념의 변화와 그 효과 분석. 학교수학, 5(1), 115-133.
- 이화영.류현아.장경윤(2009). 함수의 그래프 표현 및 그래프 해석 지도 가능성 탐색. 학교수학, 11(1), 131-145.
- 전형옥.이경화.방정숙(2009). 초등학교 6학년 학생의 양적 추론 사례 연구. 수학교육학연구, 19(1), 81-98.
- 정은실(2003). 비 개념에 대한 역사적, 수학적, 심리적 분석. 학교수학, 5(4), 421-440.
- 최지영.방정숙(2008). 초등학교 4학년 학생들의 대수적 사고 분석. 수학교육논문집, 22(2), 137-164.
- Carlson, M. (1998). A cross-sectional investigation of the development of the function concept. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education III, Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Issues in Mathematics Education, 7, 114-163.
- Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352-378. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149958
- Castillo-Garsow, C. (2012). Continuous quantitative reasoning. In R. Mayes & L. L. Hatfield (Eds.), Quantitative reasoning and mathematical modeling: A driver for STEM integrated education and teaching in context (Vol. 2, pp. 55-73). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming College of Education.
- Ellis, A. B. (2011). Algebra in the middle school: Developing functional relationship through quantitative reasoning. In J. Cai, & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization (pp.215-238). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
- Hackenberg, A. J. (2009). Relationships between students' fraction knowledge and equation solving. In Paper presentation at the research pre-session of the annual conference of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Washington, D.C.
- Lobato, J., Hohensee, C., Rhodehamel, B., & Diamond, J. (2012). Using student reasoning to inform the development of conceptual learning goals: The case of quadratic functions. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14, 85-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2012.656362
- Monk, S. (1992). Students' understanding of a function given by a physical model. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 175-193). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
- Moore, K. C., & Thompson, P. W. (2015). Shape thinking and students' graphing activity. In T. Fukawa-Connelly, N. E. Infante, K. Keene & M. Zandieh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Meeting of the MAA Special Interest Group on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 782-789. Pittsburgh, PA: RUME.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
- Smith, J., & Thompson, P. W. (2007). Quantitative reasoning and the development of algebraic reasoning. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 95-132). New York: Erlbaum.
- Steffe, L. P. & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-306). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Thompson, P. W., & Thompson, A. G. (1992). Images of rate. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.