Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science (대한안전경영과학회지)

Korea Safety Management & Science (대한안전경영과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Kano model based logistics service quality classification and potential customer Satisfaction Improvement index

Kano모델 기반의 물류 서비스 품질속성 분류와 잠재적 고객요구 개선지수 개발

  • Received : 2017.10.20
  • Accepted : 2017.12.11
  • Published : 2017.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, service quality must reflect several demands of customers who show rapid and various changes so as to be compared with the past. So, objective and rapid methods for them are necessary more. For them, first of all, service company must calculate their standard of service quality accurately by measuring service quality exactly. To measure service quality accurately, this researcher collected and analyzed data by survey for customers who are customers of logistics services, grasped potential satisfaction standard(P) by 5 point Likert scale and one survey for accurate classification of quality attributes through weighted customer satisfaction coefficient changing quality attributes by developing the study on Kano model and Timko's customer satisfaction coefficient, and suggested Potential Customer Satisfaction Improvement index(PCSI) for examining the improvement of customer satisfaction so as to utilize them as an index of differentiated and concrete measurement of service quality.

Keywords

References

  1. Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., and Tsjui, S. (1984). "Attractive quality and must-be quality." Hinshitsu 14(2):147-156.
  2. Lofgren, M. and Witell, L. (2008). "Two decades of using Kano's theory of attractive quality: a literature review." Quality Management Journal 15(1):59-75. ASQ.
  3. Timko, M, (1993), "An experimentin continuous analysis. In D.Walden (Ed.), Kano's methods for understanding customer-defined quality", The Center for Quality of Management Journal, 2(4) : 17-20.
  4. Matzler, K, Hinterhuber, H. H, Bailom, F. and Sauerwein, E, (1996), "How to delight your customers", Journal of Product and Brand Management , 5(2) : 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610429610119469
  5. Sauerwein, E, (1999), "Experiences with the reliability and validity of the Kano-method: comparison to alternate forms of classification of product requirements", The Eleventh Symposium on Quality Function Deployment : 416-29.
  6. Hejaili, F. F, Assad, L, Shaheen, F. A, Moussa, D. H, Karkar, A, AlRukhaimi, M, Barhamein, M, Suwida, A, Alhejaili, F. F, Harbi, A. S, Homrany, M, Attar, Bisher, and Al-Sayyari, A. A, (2009), "Culture-Related Service Expectations: A Comparative Study Using the Kano Model." Q Manage Health Care 18 : 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.QMH.0000344593.40886.b5
  7. Shahin, A, and Zairi, M, (2009), "Kano model: A dynamic approach for classifying and prioritising requirements of airline travellers with three case studies on international airlines", Total Quality Management 20 : 1003-1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360903181867
  8. Hogstrom, C, Rosner, M, and Gustafsson, A, (2010), "How to create attractive and unique customer experiences: An application of Kano's theory of attractive quality to recreational tourism", Marketing Intelligence & Planning 28 : 385-402. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634501011053531
  9. Berger, C, Blauth, R, Boger, D, Bolster, C, Burchill, G, DuMouchel, W, Pouliot, F, Richter, R, Rubinoff, A, Shen, D, Timko, M and Walden, D, (1993), "Kano's methods for understanding customer-defined quality" The Center for Quality Management Journal 2(4) : 1-37.
  10. Franceschini, F, (1998), "An application of quality function deployment to industrial training courses.", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 15 : 753-68. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719810226924
  11. Tam, k.c. and shen, X.X, (2000), "Integrating Kano's model in the planning matrix of quality function deployment", Total Quality Management, Vol.11 No.8 : 1141-1151. https://doi.org/10.1080/095441200440395
  12. Hsu, C, H, Chang, T, M, Wang, S, Y, and Lin, P, Y, (2007), "Integrating Kano model into quality function deploymentto facilitate decision analysis for service quality", International Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Business and Economics, Vancouver, Canada.
  13. Lee, Yu-Cheng, Sheu, Liang-Chyau, and Tsou, Yuan-Gan, (2008) "Quality function deployment implementation based on fuzzy Kano model: An application in PLM system", Computer & Industrial Engineering 55 : 48-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2007.11.014
  14. Lee, M.C. and Newcomb, J. F, (1997) "Appling the Kano methodology to meet customer requi-rements : NASA' microgravity science program", Quality Management Journal, Vol. 4 : 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.1997.11918805
  15. Matzler, K, Hinterhuber, H. H, Bailom, F. and Sauerwein, E, (1996), "How to delight your customers", Journal of Product and Brand Management , 5(2) : 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610429610119469
  16. Jang, H. Y, Song, H. G, and Park, Y. T, (2012), "Determining the importance values of quality attributes using ASC" Journal of Korean Society of Quality Management, Vol. 40, No. 4 : 589-598. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2012.40.4.589
  17. Song, H. G. 2013. "Developing and utilizing the B-W model for managing quality attributes." PhD Dissertation, Sungkyunkwan University.
  18. Sun Il Oh (2016), An Empirical Study on the Improvement of Education Service Quality using Potential Customer Demand Improvement(PCDI) Index, Doctorate of Myongji University, 60-89