DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Recovery and Return to Work After a Pelvic Fracture

  • Papasotiriou, Antonios N. (School of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University) ;
  • Prevezas, Nikolaos (Orthopedic Department, Psychiko Clinic, Athens Medical Group) ;
  • Krikonis, Konstantinos (Statistics and Research Design Company, DatAnalysis) ;
  • Alexopoulos, Evangelos C. (School of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University)
  • Received : 2016.03.31
  • Accepted : 2016.10.15
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

Background: Pelvic ring fractures (PRFs) may influence the daily activities and quality of life of the injured. The aim of this retrospective study was to explore the functional outcomes and factors related to return to work (RTW) after PRF. Methods: During the years 2003-2012, 282 injured individuals aged 20-55 years on the date of the accident, were hospitalized and treated for PRFs in a large tertiary hospital in Athens, Greece. One hundred and three patients were traced and contacted; 77 who were on paid employment prior to the accident gave their informed consent to participate in the survey, which was conducted in early 2015 through telephone interviews. The questionnaire included variables related to injury, treatment and activities, and the Majeed pelvic score. Univariate and multiple regression analyses were used for statistical assessment. Results: Almost half of the injured (46.7%) fully RTW, and earning losses were reported to be 35% after PRF. The univariate analysis confirmed that RTW was significantly related to accident site (labor or not), the magnitude of the accident's force, concomitant injuries, duration of hospitalization, time to RTW, engagement to the same sport, Majeed score, and complications such as limp and pain as well as urologic and sexual complaints (p < 0.05 for all). On multiple logistic regression analysis, the accident sustained out of work (odds ratio: 6.472, 95% confidence interval: 1.626-25.769) and Majeed score (odds ratio: 3.749, 95% confidence interval: 2.092-6.720) were identified as independent predictive factors of full RTW. Conclusion: PRFs have severe socioeconomic consequences. Possible predictors of RTW should be taken into account for health management and policies.

Keywords

References

  1. Pohlemann T, Tsherne H, Baumqartel F, Eqbers HJ, Euler E, Maurer F, Fell M, Mayr E, Quirini WW, Schlickewei W, Weinberg A. Pelvic fractures: epidemiology, therapy and long term outcome. Overview of the multicenter study of the Pelvis Study Group. Unfallchirurg 1996;99:160-7 [in German].
  2. Prevezas N. Evolution of pelvic and acetabular surgery from ancient to modern times. Injury 2007;38:397-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.01.035
  3. Pohlemann T, Stengel D, Tosounidis G, Reilmann H, Stuby F, Stockle U, Seekamp A, Schmal H, Thannheimer A, Holmenschlager F, Gansslen A, Rommens PM, Fuchs T, Baumgartel F, Marintschev I, Krischak G, Wunder S, Tscherne H, Culemann U. Survival trends and predictors of mortality in severe pelvic trauma: estimates from the German Pelvic Trauma Registry Initiative. Injury 2011;42:997-1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.053
  4. Balogh Z, King KL, Mackay P, McDougall D, Mackenzie S, Evans JA, Lyons T, Deane SA. The epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures: a population-based study. J Trauma 2007;63:1066-73. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181589fa4
  5. McCormack R, Strauss EJ, Alwattar BJ, Tejwani NC. Diagnosis and management of pelvic fractures. Bull NYU Hosp Joint Dis 2010;68:281-91.
  6. Sapkas G, Papadakis SA, Galanakos SP, Kateros K. The knowledge of injury's mechanism is the answer. Acta Orthop Hell 2014;65:127-31.
  7. Gurevitz S, Bender B, Tytium Y, Velkes S, Salai M, Stein M. The role of pelvic fractures in the course of treatment and outcome of trauma patients. Isr Med Assoc J 2005;7:623-6.
  8. Durkin A, Sagi HC, Durham R, Flint L. Contemporary management of pelvic fractures. Am J Surg 2006;192:211-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.05.001
  9. Day One [Internet]. 2015. [cited 20th of May 2015]. Available from: https://www.justgiving.com/Day-One.
  10. Tile M. Fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum. 3rd ed. Baltimore (USA): Williams & Wilkins; 2003.
  11. Burgess AR, Eastridge BJ, Young JW, Ellison TS, Ellison SP, Poka A, Bathon GH, Brumback RJ. Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols. J Trauma 1990;30:848-56. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199007000-00015
  12. Borg T, Berq P, Fugl-Meyer K, Larsson S. Health-related quality of life and life satisfaction in patients following surgically treated pelvic ring fractures. A prospective observational study with two years follow up. Injury 2010;41:400-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2009.11.006
  13. Lefaivre KA, Slobogean GF, Valeriote J, O'Brien PJ, Macadam SA. Reporting and interpretation of the functional outcomes after the surgical treatment of disruptions of the pelvic ring. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012;94:549-55.
  14. Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E, Bostman O, Santavirta S. Failure of reduction with an external fixator in the management of injuries of the pelvic ring: long term evaluation of 110 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999;81:955-62. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.81B6.8571
  15. Bjurlin MA, Fantus RJ, Mellett MM, Goble SM. Genitourinary injuries in pelvic fracture morbidity and mortality using the National Trauma Data Bank. J Trauma 2009;67:1033-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181bb8d6c
  16. Demetriades D, Karaiskakis M, Toutouzas K, Alo K, Velmahos G, Chan L. Pelvic fractures: epidemiology and predictors of associated abdominal injuries and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 2002;195:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01197-3
  17. Keating JF, Werier J, Blachut P, Broekhuyse H, Meek RN, O'Brien PJ. Early fixation of the vertically unstable pelvis: the role of iliosacral screw fixation of the posterior lesion. J Orthop Trauma 1999;13:107-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199902000-00007
  18. Harvey-Kelly KF, Kanakaris NK, Obakponovwe O, West RM, Giannoudis PV. Quality of life and sexual function after traumatic pelvic fracture. J Orthop Trauma 2014;28:28-35. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31828fc063
  19. Shakespeare-Finch J, Enders T. Corroborating evidence of posttraumatic growth. J Trauma Stress 2008;21:1-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20321
  20. Cole DJ, Blum AD, Ansel LJ. Outcome after fixation of unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries. Clin Orthop 1996;329:160-79. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199608000-00020
  21. Sen KR, Veerappa LA. Outcome analysis of pelvic ring injuries. Indian J Orthop 2010;44:79-83. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.58610
  22. Aprato A, Joeris A, Tosto F, Kalampoki V, Rometsch E, Favuto M, Stucchi A, Azi M, Masse A. Are work return and leaves of absence predictable after an unstable pelvic ring injury? J Orthop Traumatol 2016;17:169-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-015-0379-2
  23. Nusser M, Holstiege J, Kaluscha R, Tepohl L, Stuby F. Roderer G, Krischak G. Return to work after fractures of the pelvis and the acetabulum. Z Orthop Unfall 2015;153:282-8 [in German]. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1396261
  24. Gabbe BJ, Hofstee DJ, Esser M, Bucknill A, Russ MK, Cameron PA, Handley C, de Steiger RN. Functional and return to work outcomes following major trauma involving severe pelvic ring fractures. ANZ J Surg 2015;85:749-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.12700
  25. Harvey-Kelly KF, Kanakaris NK, Obakponovwe O, West R, Roberts CS, Giannoudis PV. The impact of traumatic pelvic fractures on sporting activity and quality of pelvis. J R Nav Med Serv 2014;100:73-80.
  26. Ratzon NZ, Shevil EBA, Froom P, Friedman S, Amit Y. Functional capacity evaluation of work performance among individuals with pelvic injuries following motor vehicle accidents. Work 2013;45:191-200.
  27. Majeed SA. Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989;71:304-6.
  28. Manson T, O'Toole RV, Whitney A, Duggan B, Sciadini M, Nascone J. Young-Burgess classification of pelvic ring fractures: does it predict mortality, transfusion requirements, and non-orthopaedic injuries? J Orthop Trauma 2010;24:603-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181d3cb6b
  29. Wouter VJ, Ewout SW, Essink-Bot M-L, van Beeck EF, Meeuwis JD, Leenen L. Prevalence and department of disabilities and return to work after major trauma. Injury 2005;58:126-35.
  30. Dujardin FH, Hossenbaccus M, Duparc F, Bliga N, Thomine JM. Long-term functional prognosis of posterior injuries in high-energy pelvic disruption. J Orthop Trauma 1998;12:145-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199803000-00001
  31. Stogjanovich L, Marisavljevich D. Stress as a trigger of autoimmune disease. Autoimmun Rev 2008;7:209-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2007.11.007
  32. Melton 3rd LJ, Sampson JM, Morrey B, Ilstrup DM. Epidemiologic features of pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop 1981;155:43-7.
  33. Short MM, Mushquash CJ, Bedard M. Motor vehicle crashes among Canadian Aboriginal people: a review of the literature. Can J Rural Med 2013;18:86-98.
  34. Gross T, Attenberger C, Huegli R, Amsler F. Factors associated with reduced longer-term capacity to work in patients after polytrauma: a Swiss trauma center experience. J Am Coll Surg 2010;211:81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.042
  35. Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol 2007;165:710-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwk052
  36. Giannoudis PV, Pohlemann T, Bircher M. Pelvic and acetabular surgery within Europe: the need for the co-ordination of treatment concepts. Injury 2007;38:410-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.01.026

Cited by

  1. Inaccuracies in the Use of the Majeed Pelvic Outcome Score: A Systematic Literature Review vol.34, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000001701
  2. The socioeconomic impact of orthopaedic trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis vol.15, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227907
  3. The effect of age and sex on pelvic bone density measured opportunistically in clinical CT scans vol.39, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24792
  4. Vocational rehabilitation to enhance return to work after trauma (ROWTATE): protocol for a non-randomised single-arm mixed-methods feasibility study vol.7, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00769-4