DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Immediate effect of self-myofascial release on hamstring flexibility

  • Jung, Jihye (Physical Therapy Team, Hangeoleum Rehabilitation Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Wonjae (Department of Physical Therapy, Health and Welfare Graduate School) ;
  • Lee, Yonghyuk (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science and Social Welfare, Sahmyook University) ;
  • Kim, Jiwoo (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science and Social Welfare, Sahmyook University) ;
  • Kim, Hyunju (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science and Social Welfare, Sahmyook University) ;
  • Lee, Kyoungho (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science and Social Welfare, Sahmyook University) ;
  • Lee, Jaewoo (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science and Social Welfare, Sahmyook University) ;
  • Lee, Seungwon (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science and Social Welfare, Sahmyook University)
  • 투고 : 2017.02.28
  • 심사 : 2017.03.21
  • 발행 : 2017.03.30

초록

Objective: This study aimed to identify the area with greatest effect using self-myofascial release technique (self-MFR) in the hamstring, suboccipital, and plantar regions. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Twenty-two adult subjects were evaluated for flexibility and hamstring pain threshold after self-MFR. Based on the superficial back line, the self-MFR application areas were the suboccipital region, hamstring, and plantar regions. Self-MFR was applied to each area using a wooden pole for a total of 4 minutes. Self-MFR was applied for 3 days at the same time of day, which was randomly assigned for each subject. Treatment was applied to one area each day. The sit and reach test (SRT), active range of motion (AROM), and passive ROM (PROM) were used to determine changes in flexibility, and an algometer was used to determine pain threshold. Pre/post-self-MFR effectiveness was tested using a paired t-test. Repeated measurement was used to compare self-MFR effects in the suboccipital, hamstring, and plantar regions. Results: When the self-MFR technique was applied to the 3 areas, the SRT showed significant improvement over baseline (p<0.05). Bilateral AROM and PROM showed significant improvements (p<0.05). When the self-MFR technique was applied to the hamstring, the semimembranosus showed a significant change in pain threshold (p<0.05). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that indirect application based on the Anatomy Trains could be effective for those who need to improve muscle flexibility. Moreover, self-MFR easily alleviates myofascial pain while maintaining flexibility, and can be performed at any time and place.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Wong KK, Chai HM, Chen YJ, Wang CL, Shau YW, Wang SF. Mechanical deformation of posterior thoracolumbar fascia after myofascial release in healthy men: a study of dynamic ultrasound imaging. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2017;27:124-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2016.10.011
  2. Ajimsha MS, Al-Mudahka NR, Al-Madzhar JA. Effectiveness of myofascial release: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2015;19:102-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.06.001
  3. Beardsley C, Skarabot J. Effects of self-myofascial release: a systematic review. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2015;19:747-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.08.007
  4. Kalichman L, Ben David C. Effect of self-myofascial release on myofascial pain, muscle flexibility, and strength: a narrative review. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.11.006.
  5. MacDonald GZ, Penney MD, Mullaley ME, Cuconato AL, Drake CD, Behm DG, et al. An acute bout of self-myofascial release increases range of motion without a subsequent decrease in muscle activation or force. J Strength Cond Res 2013;27:812-21. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825c2bc1
  6. Mohr AR, Long BC, Goad CL. Effect of foam rolling and static stretching on passive hip-flexion range of motion. J Sport Rehabil 2014;23:296-9. https://doi.org/10.1123/JSR.2013-0025
  7. Skarabot J, Beardsley C, Stirn I. Comparing the effects of selfmyofascial release with static stretching on ankle range-of-motion in adolescent athletes. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2015;10:203-12.
  8. Peacock CA, Krein DD, Antonio J, Sanders GJ, Silver TA, Colas M. Comparing acute bouts of sagittal plane progression foam rolling vs. frontal plane progression foam rolling. J Strength Cond Res 2015;29:2310-5. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000867
  9. Sullivan KM, Silvey DB, Button DC, Behm DG. Roller-massager application to the hamstrings increases sit-and-reach range of motion within five to ten seconds without performance impairments. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2013;8:228-36.
  10. Bradbury-Squires DJ, Noftall JC, Sullivan KM, Behm DG, Power KE, Button DC. Roller-massager application to the quadriceps and knee-joint range of motion and neuromuscular efficiency during a lunge. J Athl Train 2015;50:133-40. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-49.5.03
  11. Halperin I, Aboodarda SJ, Button DC, Andersen LL, Behm DG. Roller massager improves range of motion of plantar flexor muscles without subsequent decreases in force parameters. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2014;9:92-102.
  12. Grieve R, Goodwin F, Alfaki M, Bourton AJ, Jeffries C, Scott H. The immediate effect of bilateral self myofascial release on the plantar surface of the feet on hamstring and lumbar spine flexibility: a pilot randomised controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2015;19:544-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.12.004
  13. Mikesky AE, Bahamonde RE, Stanton K, Alvey T, Fitton T. Acute effects of The Stick on strength, power, and flexibility. J Strength Cond Res 2002;16:446-50.
  14. Jay K, Sundstrup E, Sondergaard SD, Behm D, Brandt M, Saervoll CA, et al. Specific and cross over effects of massage for muscle soreness: randomized controlled trial. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2014;9:82-91.
  15. Okamoto T, Masuhara M, Ikuta K. Acute effects of self-myofascial release using a foam roller on arterial function. J Strength Cond Res 2014;28:69-73. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31829480f5
  16. Chan YC, Wang TJ, Chang CC, Chen LC, Chu HY, Lin SP, et al. Short-term effects of self-massage combined with home exercise on pain, daily activity, and autonomic function in patients with myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome. J Phys Ther Sci 2015;27: 217-21. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.217
  17. Koulouris G, Connell D. Imaging of hamstring injuries: therapeutic implications. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1478-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-0075-3
  18. Hafez AR, Al-Johani AH, Zakaria AR, Al-Ahaideb A, Buragadda S, Melam GR, et al. Treatment of knee osteoarthritis in relation to hamstring and quadriceps strength. J Phys Ther Sci 2013;25: 1401-5. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.25.1401
  19. Jandre Reis FJ, Macedo AR. Influence of hamstring tightness in pelvic, lumbar and trunk range of motion in low back pain and asymptomatic volunteers during forward bending. Asian Spine J 2015;9:535-40. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2015.9.4.535
  20. Law RY, Harvey LA, Nicholas MK, Tonkin L, De Sousa M, Finniss DG. Stretch exercises increase tolerance to stretch in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther 2009;89:1016-26. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20090056
  21. Witvrouw E, Danneels L, Asselman P, D'Have T, Cambier D. Muscle flexibility as a risk factor for developing muscle injuries in male professional soccer players. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med 2003;31:41-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465030310011801
  22. Bradley PS, Portas MD. The relationship between preseason range of motion and muscle strain injury in elite soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2007;21:1155-9.
  23. Gajdosik RL, Hatcher CK, Whitsell S. Influence of short hamstring muscles on the pelvis and lumbar spine in standing and during the toe-touch test. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1992;7: 38-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0268-0033(92)90006-P
  24. Myers TW. Anatomy trains: myofascial meridians for manual and movement therapists. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2014.
  25. Cho SH, Kim SH, Park DJ. The comparison of the immediate effects of application of the suboccipital muscle inhibition and self-myofascial release techniques in the suboccipital region on short hamstring. J Phys Ther Sci 2015;27:195-7. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.195
  26. Kim DH, Matkowskyj KA, Lubner MG, Hinshaw JL, Munoz Del Rio A, Pooler BD, et al. Serrated polyps at CT colonography: prevalence and characteristics of the serrated polyp spectrum. Radiology 2016;280:455-63. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016151608
  27. Lemmink KA, Kemper HC, de Greef MH, Rispens P, Stevens M. The validity of the sit-and-reach test and the modified sit-andreach test in middle-aged to older men and women. Res Q Exerc Sport 2003;74:331-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2003.10609099
  28. Youdas JW, Krause DA, Hollman JH. Validity of hamstring muscle length assessment during the sit-and-reach test using an inclinometer to measure hip joint angle. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22:303-9. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31815f5b7d
  29. Cornbleet SL, Woolsey NB. Assessment of hamstring muscle length in school-aged children using the sit-and-reach test and the inclinometer measure of hip joint angle. Phys Ther 1996;76: 850-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/76.8.850
  30. Hemmatinezhad M, Afsharnezhad T, Nateghi N, Damirchi A. The relationship between limb length with classical and modified back saver sit-and-reach tests in student boys. Int J Fit 2009; 5:69.
  31. Nussbaumer S, Leunig M, Glatthorn JF, Stauffacher S, Gerber H, Maffiuletti NA. Validity and test-retest reliability of manual goniometers for measuring passive hip range of motion in femoroacetabular impingement patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010;11:194. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-194
  32. Neto T, Jacobsohn L, Carita AI, Oliveira R. Reliability of the active-knee-extension and straight-leg-raise tests in subjects with flexibility deficits. J Sport Rehabil 2015;Technical Notes 17: 2014-0220.
  33. Aparicio EQ, Quirante LB, Blanco CR, Sendin FA. Immediate effects of the suboccipital muscle inhibition technique in subjects with short hamstring syndrome. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009;32:262-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.03.006
  34. Kim JH, Kim JG, Do KS, Yim JG. The effect of applying a head-weight device on cervical angle and pain of neck muscles. Phys Ther Rehabil Sci 2016;5:101-5. https://doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2016.5.2.101
  35. Antonaci F, Sand T, Lucas GA. Pressure algometry in healthy subjects: inter-examiner variability. Scand J Rehabil Med 1998; 30:3-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/003655098444255
  36. Webb TR, Rajendran D. Myofascial techniques: what are their effects on joint range of motion and pain? -a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2016;20:682-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.02.013
  37. Hyong IH, Kang JH. The immediate effects of passive hamstring stretching exercises on the cervical spine range of motion and balance. J Phys Ther Sci 2013;25:113-6. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.25.113

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of vibration vs non-vibration foam rolling techniques on flexibility, dynamic balance and perceived joint stability after fatigue vol.7, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8000
  2. The Parameters of Foam Rolling, Self-Myofascial Release Treatment: A Review of the Literature vol.11, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2478/bhk-2019-0005
  3. Comparison of the immediate effect of hamstring stretching techniques on hamstring muscle range of motion, pressure pain threshold and muscle tone vol.8, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14474/ptrs.2019.8.4.210
  4. Selective Effects of Manual Massage and Foam Rolling on Perceived Recovery and Performance: Current Knowledge and Future Directions Toward Robotic Massages vol.11, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.598898
  5. Effects of myofascial release or self-myofascial release and control position exercises on lower back pain in idiopathic scoliosis: A systematic review vol.27, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.02.017