한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육 (Education of Primary School Mathematics)

  • 제20권2호
  • /
  • Pages.153-162
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1226-6914(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9927(eISSN)
한국수학교육학회 (Korean Society of Mathematical Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

수학교수 관행에 대하여 예비교사들이 자각하는 준비도

Preservice Elementary Teachers' Perceived Preparedness of High-Leverage Practices in Mathematics Teaching

  • 투고 : 2017.03.24
  • 심사 : 2017.04.29
  • 발행 : 2017.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 수학교수에서 중요도가 높은 관행들(High-leverage Teaching Practices [HLPs])에 대해 예비교사들이 스스로 자각하고 있는 준비도를 조사하였다. 미국 중서부에 위치한 대학에서 수학교육방법론을 수강하고 있는 81명의 예비초등교사들이 HLPs에 대한 자신감 및 능력에 대한 자가응답을 요하는 설문조사에 참여하였다. 특히 이 연구는 예비교사들이 자각하고 있는 HLPs에 대한 준비도와 수학교사교육자들이 예측하고 있는 교사교육 진행과정에 대한 비교 연구를 하였다. 연구결과는 예비교사들과 수학교사교육자들이 HLPs의 복잡성에 대해 상당히 다른 견해를 보이고 있음을 제시하고 있다. 본 연구는 교사교육 프로그램들이 각각의 수학교수관행을 세분화하여 고찰할 수 있는 구체적인 기회를 예비교사들에게 제공할 것을 제안한다.

This study examined elementary pre-service teachers' (PSTs') perceived preparedness of high-leverage practices (HLPs) in mathematics teaching. Eighty-one elementary PSTs who enrolled in four sections of an elementary mathematics methods course at a Midwestern University in the United States participated in a survey that inquired their self-reported confidence and competence levels on HLPs. This study specifically investigated the comparison between PSTs' perceptions of HLPs and the mathematics teacher educators' expectations. Findings show several glaring differences between the PSTs' perceptions and experts' perceptions in regards to the complexity of some HLPs. This study suggests that initial teacher training programs should include more specific investment in PSTs' insights into details of each teaching practice in mathematics by deliberate decompositions.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497-511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348479
  2. Ball, D. L., Sleep, L., Boerst, T., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 458-474. https://doi.org/10.1086/596996
  3. Davis, E. A., & Boerst, T. (2014). Designing elementary teacher education to prepare well-started beginners. TeachingWorks Working Papers. TeachingWorks: University of Michigan. Available: http://www.teachingworks.org/research-data/workingpapers
  4. Dicke, T., Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., Kunter, M., Schmeck, A., & Leutner, D. (2014). Self-efficacy in classroom management, classroom disturbances, and emotional exhaustion: A moderated mediation analysis of teacher candidates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 569-583. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035504
  5. Feiman-Nemser, S., McDiarmid, G.W., Melnick, S.L. & Parker, M. (1989). Changing beginning teachers' conceptions: a description of an introductory teacher education course. East Lansing, MI: National Centre for Research in Teacher Education, Michigan State University.
  6. Fry, S. W. (2009). Characteristics and experiences that contribute to novice elementary teachers' success and efficacy. Teacher Education Quarterly, 36(2), 95-110.
  7. Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055-2100.
  8. Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 184-205. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312906
  9. Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358-389). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  10. Handal, B. (2003). Teachers' mathematical beliefs: A review. The Mathematics Educator, 13(2), 47-57.
  11. Hatch, T., & Grossman, P. (2009). Learning to look beyond the boundaries of representation: Using technology to examine teaching (Overview for a digital exhibition: Learning from the practice of teaching). Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 70-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328533
  12. Hollingsworth, S. (1989). Prior beliefs and cognitive change in learning to teach. American Educational Research Journal, 26(2), 160-189. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312026002160
  13. Howard, T. C. (2017). TeachingWorks: High-leverage practices. University of Michigan. Retrieved from: http://www.teachingworks.org/images/files/Dr._Tyrone_Howard_January_Seminar.pdf
  14. Jamil, F. M., Downer, J. T., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). Association of pre-service teachers' performance, personality, and beliefs with teacher self-efficacy at program completion. Teacher Education Quarterly, 39(4), 119-138.
  15. Joram, E. & Gabriele, A. (1998). Preservice teacher's prior beliefs: Transforming obstacles into opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00035-8
  16. Lampert, M. (2009). Learning Teaching in, from, and for Practice: What Do We Mean? Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 21-34.
  17. Lampert, M., & Graziani, F. (2009). Instructional activities as a tool for teachers' and teacher educators' learning. Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 491-509. https://doi.org/10.1086/596998
  18. Levine, A. (2006, September). Educating school teachers: The education schools project. Retrieved from http://www.edschools. org/pdf/Educating_Teachers_Report.pdf
  19. Murphy, P.K., Delli, L.A.M. & Edwards, M.N. (2004). The good teacher and good teaching: comparing beliefs of second-grade students, preservice teachers, and inservice teachers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(2), 69-92. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.72.2.69-92
  20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
  21. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of educational research, 66(4), 543-578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543
  22. Powell, R. R. (1992). The influence of prior experience on pedagogical constructs of traditional and nontraditional preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(3), 225-238.
  23. Shaughnessy, M., Garcia, M., Selling, S.K., O'Neill, M. K., Salazar, S. B., Wilkes, C., Willis, A., Ball, D. L. (2016). Assessing novices' skills in leading mathematics discussions. [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http://www.teachingworks.org/images/files/AERA_2016_Beginning_Mathematics_Teaching_Presentation_Shareable.pdf
  24. TeachingWorks (2017). TeachingWorks: High-lever age practices. University of Michigan. Retrieved from: http://www.teachingworks.org/work-of-teaching/high-leverage-practices.
  25. Weinstein, C. (1988). Preservice teachers' expectations about the first year of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(88)90022-4
  26. Whitbeck, D.A. (2000). Born to be a teacher: What am I doing in a college of education? Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 15(1), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540009594781
  27. Zeichner, K. (2012). The Turn Once Again Toward Practice-Based Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 376-382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112445789