DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Design of steel frames by an enhanced moth-flame optimization algorithm

  • Received : 2016.10.11
  • Accepted : 2017.03.16
  • Published : 2017.05.20

Abstract

Structural optimization is one of the popular and active research areas in the field of structural engineering. In the present study, the newly developed moth-flame optimization (MFO) algorithm and its enhanced version termed as enhanced moth-flame optimization (EMFO) are employed to implement the optimization process of planar and 3D steel frame structures with discrete design variables. The main inspiration of this optimizer is the navigation method of moths in nature called transverse orientation. A number of benchmark steel frame optimization problems are solved by the MFO and EMFO algorithms and the results are compared with those of other meta-heuristics. The obtained numerical results indicate that the proposed EMFO algorithm possesses better computational performance compared with other existing meta-heuristics.

Keywords

References

  1. AISC-ASD (1989), American Institute of Steel Construction-Allowable Stress Design; Manual of Steel Construction, (9th Ed.), Chicago, IL, USA.
  2. AISC-LRFD (2001), American Institute of Steel Construction-Load and Resistance Factor Design; Manual of steel construction, Chicago, IL, USA.
  3. ANSYS Incorporated (2006), ANSYS Release 10.0.
  4. Artar, M. and Daloglu, A.T. (2015), "Optimum design of composite steel frames with semi-rigid connections and column bases via genetic algorithm", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 19(4), 1035-1053. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.4.1035
  5. ASCE 7-05 (2005), Minimum design loads for building and other structures.
  6. Aydin, E., Sonmez, M. and Karabork, T. (2015), "Optimal placement of elastic steel diagonal braces using artificial bee colony algorithm", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 19(2), 349-368. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.2.349
  7. Camp, C.V., Bichon, B.J. and Stovall, S.P. (2005), "Design of steel frames using ant colony optimization", J. Struct. Eng., 131(3), 369-379. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:3(369)
  8. Degertekin, S.O. (2008), "Optimum design of steel frames using harmony search algorithm", Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 36(4), 393-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-007-0177-4
  9. Gholizadeh, S. and Fattahi, F. (2014), "Design optimization of tall steel buildings by a modified particle swarm algorithm", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Buil., 23(4), 285-301. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1042
  10. Gholizadeh, S. and Barati, H. (2014), "Topology optimization of nonlinear single layer domes by a new metaheuristic", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 16(6), 681-701. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.16.6.681
  11. Gholizadeh, S. and Poorhoseini, H. (2015), "Optimum design of steel frame structures by a modified dolphin echolocation algorithm", Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J., 55(3), 535-554. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.55.3.535
  12. Hasancebi, O., Bahcecioglu, T., Kurc, O. and Saka, M.P. (2011), "Optimum design of high-rise steel buildings using an evolution strategy integrated parallel algorithm", Comput. Struct., 89(21), 2037-2051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.05.019
  13. Kaveh, A. and Bakhshpoori, T. (2015), "Subspace search mechanism and cuckoo search algorithm for size optimization of space trusses", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 18(2), 289-303. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.18.2.289
  14. Kaveh, A. and Farhoudi, N. (2013), "A new optimization method: Dolphin echolocation", Adv. Eng. Softw., 59, 53-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.03.004
  15. Kaveh, A. and Shokohi, F. (2015), "Optimum design of laterallysupported castellated beams using CBO algorithm", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 18(2), 305-324. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.18.2.305
  16. Kaveh, A. and Talatahari, S. (2010), "An improved ant colony optimization for the design of planar steel frames", Eng. Struct., 32(3), 864-873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.012
  17. Lamberti, L. and Pappalettere, C. (2011), "Metaheuristic design optimization of skeletal structures: a review", Comput. Technol. Rev., 4(1), 1-32.
  18. MATLAB (2006), The language of technical computing; The Math Works. [Software]
  19. Mirjalili, S. (2015), "Moth-flame optimization algorithm: A novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm", Knowl.-Based. Syst., 89, 228-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.07.006
  20. Pezeshk, S., Camp, C.V. and Chen, D. (2000), "Design of nonlinear framed structures using genetic algorithms", J. Struct. Eng., 126(3), 382-388. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:3(382)
  21. Rafiee, A., Talatahari, S. and Hadidi, A. (2013), "Optimum design of steel frames with semi-rigid connections using Big Bang-Big Crunch method", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 14(5), 431-451. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2013.14.5.431
  22. Talatahari, S., Gandomi, A.H., Yang, X.S. and Deb, S. (2015), "Optimum design of frame structures using the eagle strategy with differential evolution", Eng. Struct., 91, 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.02.026
  23. Togan, V. (2012), "Design of planar steel frames using teaching-learning based optimization", Eng. Struct., 34, 225-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.035

Cited by

  1. An efficient hybrid of elephant herding optimization and cultural algorithm for optimal design of trusses pp.1435-5663, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0631-5
  2. A Comparison between different techniques for optimum design of steel frames subjected to blast vol.15, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78254952
  3. Truss structure damage identification using residual force vector and genetic algorithm vol.25, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.25.4.485
  4. Performance based design optimum of CBFs using bee colony algorithm vol.27, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.27.5.613
  5. Structural damage detection based on MAC flexibility and frequency using moth-flame algorithm vol.70, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.70.6.649
  6. Rao-3 algorithm for the weight optimization of reinforced concrete cantilever retaining wall vol.20, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.20.6.527