DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Surface Pretreatment on Deposition and Adhesion of Electrophoretic Paint on AZ31 Mg Alloy

  • Received : 2017.04.11
  • Accepted : 2017.04.25
  • Published : 2017.04.30

Abstract

In this work, electrophoretic paint (E-paint) was deposited on AZ31 Mg alloy after four different surface pretreatments: knife abrading, SiC paper abrading, deionized (DI) water immersion and NaOH immersion. The deposition process of E-paint was studied by analyses of voltage-time and current-time curves, amount of deposited paint, current efficiency and surface oxide film resistance and the adhesion of E-paint was examined by tape test before and after immersion in DI water for 500 h at $40$^{\circ}C$. It was found that the induction time for the deposition, the amount of deposited paint and the current efficiency are inversely proportional to the resistances of surface films prepared by different surface pretreatment methods. The electrophoretic painting showed longer inductance time, larger amount of deposited paint and higher current efficiency on the highly conducting surfaces, such as knife-abraded and SiC-abraded surfaces than on the less conducting surfaces, such as DI water-immersed and NaOH-immersed samples. Excellent adhesion was observed on the E-paintings deposited onto knife-abraded and SiC-abraded AZ31 Mg alloy samplesSiC-abraded AZ31 Mg alloy samples.

Keywords

References

  1. H.E. Friedrich, B.L. Mordike, Technology of Magnesium and Magnesium Alloys, Springer, 2006.
  2. G. Makar, J. Kruger, A. Joshi, Advances in magnesium alloys and composites, Magnesium Technology, (1988) 105-121.
  3. G. Song, A. Atrens, Understanding magnesium corrosion-a framework for improved alloy performance, Adv. Eng. Mater., 5 (2003) 837-858. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.200310405
  4. G.L. Song, A. Atrens, Corrosion mechanisms of magnesium alloys, Adv. Eng. Mater., 1 (1999) 11-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1527-2648(199909)1:1<11::AID-ADEM11>3.0.CO;2-N
  5. J. Gray, B. Luan, Protective coatings on magnesium and its alloys-a critical review, J. Alloys Compd., 336 (2002) 88-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(01)01899-0
  6. N. Li, Y. Zheng, Novel magnesium alloys developed for biomedical application: a review, Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 29 (2013) 489-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2013.02.005
  7. X. Chen, H. Yang, T. Abbott, M. Easton, N. Birbilis, Corrosion-resistant electrochemical platings on magnesium alloys: a state-of-the-art review, Corrosion, 68 (2012) 518-535. https://doi.org/10.5006/i0010-9312-68-6-518
  8. N. Van Phuong, K. Lee, D. Chang, M. Kim, S. Lee, S. Moon, Zinc phosphate conversion coatings on magnesium alloys: A review, Met. Mate. Int., 19 (2013) 273-281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-013-2023-0
  9. N. Van Phuong, K.H. Lee, D. Chang, S. Moon, Effects of $Zn^{2+}$ concentration and pH on the zinc phosphate conversion coatings on AZ31 magnesium alloy, Corros. Sci., 74 (2013) 314-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2013.05.005
  10. L. Besra, M. Liu, A review on fundamentals and applications of electrophoretic deposition (EPD), Prog. Mater Sci., 52 (2007) 1-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.07.001
  11. F. Beck, Fundamental aspects of electrodeposition of paint, Prog. Org. Coat., 4 (1976) 1-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9440(76)80001-X
  12. N. Acamovic, D. Drazic, V. Miskovic-Stankovic, Influence of substrate on the formation and growth kinetics of cathodic electrocoat paint, Prog. Org. Coat., 25 (1995) 293-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9440(94)00511-X
  13. K. Arlt, Cathodic deposition of paint, Electrochim. Acta, 39 (1994) 1189-1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(94)E0036-Y
  14. N. Van Phuong, S. Moon, Deposition and characterization of E-paint on magnesium alloys, Prog. Org. Coat., 89 (2015) 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2015.08.014
  15. N. Van Phuong, M. Gupta, S. Moon, Adhesion and corrosion studies of electrophoretic paint on AZ31 Mg alloy pretreated in cerium solution with and without addition of ethanol, Prog. Org. Coat., 102 (2017) 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.10.006
  16. P.E. Pierce, The physical chemistry of the cathodic electrodeposition process, J. Coat. Technol., 53 (1981) 52-67.
  17. C. Reddy, R. Gaston, C. Weikart, H. Yasuda, Influence of surface pretreatment and electrocoating parameters on the adhesion of cathodic electrocoat to the Al alloy surfaces, Prog. Org. Coat., 33 (1998) 225-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9440(98)00068-X
  18. I. Krylova, P. Zubov, Formation and properties of coatings produced by electrodeposition of paints, Prog. Org. Coat., 12 (1984) 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-0655(84)80005-9
  19. R.-G. Hu, S. Zhang, J.-F. Bu, C.-J. Lin, G.-L. Song, Recent progress in corrosion protection of magnesium alloys by organic coatings, Prog. Org. Coat., 73 (2012) 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2011.10.011
  20. J. Zhang, C. Wu, Corrosion protection behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy with cathodic electrophoretic coating pretreated by silane, Prog. Org. Coat., 66 (2009) 387-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.09.001
  21. N. Van Phuong, S. Moon, Deposition and Characterization of Electrophoretic Paint on AZ31 Magnesium Alloy, J. Korean Inst. Surf. Eng, 49 (2016).
  22. N. Van Phuong, B.R. Fazal, S. Moon, Electrophoretic painting on AZ31 Mg alloy pretreated in cerium conversion coating solutions prepared in ethanol-water mixtures, Met. Mate. Int., 23 (2017) 106-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-017-6481-7
  23. A. Standard, D3359-09e2. Standard Test Methods for Measuring Adhesion by Tape Test, ASTM International, (2009).
  24. M. Taheri, J. Kish, Nature of surface film formed on Mg exposed to 1 M NaOH, J. Electrochem. Soc., 160 (2013) C36-C41.
  25. J.H. Nordlien, S. Ono, N. Masuko, K. Nis, Morphology and structure of oxide films formed on magnesium by exposure to air and water, J. Electrochem. Soc., 142 (1995) 3320-3322. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2049981
  26. M. Taheri, R. Phillips, J. Kish, G. Botton, Analysis of the surface film formed on Mg by exposure to water using a FIB cross-section and STEM-EDS, Corros. Sci., 59 (2012) 222-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2012.03.001
  27. W. Ehm, R. Kaus, C. Schiller, W. Strunz, New Trends in Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy and Electrochemical Noise Analysis, ed, F. Mansfeld, F. Huet, OR Mattos, Electrochemical Society Inc., Pennington, NJ, 2000 (2001) 24.