DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Enablers and Barriers of BIM-based Assembling Collaboration for Designers' Communication and Socio-Psychological Mechanisms

BIM기반의 어셈블링 협업이 설계자 간의 의사교환과 사회심리학적 기제에 미치는 효과와 한계에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2017.03.20
  • Accepted : 2017.03.21
  • Published : 2017.03.31

Abstract

While previous studies argue that BIM-based assembling collaboration promotes the communication and process management among participants in architectural design projects, it is still unknown which communication and socio-psychological factors are more and less activated in use of BIM-based collaboration. To investigate this research aim, in authentic BIM-used architectural retrofitting projects, the participants (N=36) collaborated and assessed the communication factors on (1) perceiving design results, (2)understanding partners'design intention, (3) proposing and converging opinions, the interpersonal design process management factors on (1) managing design process, (2) managing collaboration schedule, and the complementedness factors on (1) understanding partners' expertise, and comradeship. Statistical analyses reveal that the factor relevant to perceiving design results is better activated than the other factors (p<0.05), but all other factors are not much activated compared to perceiving design results. Deduced from the previous BIM studies and interviews, a reason roots in the shared forms and semantics of BIM. The shared semantics represent collaborators' information and allow the participants to perceive design changes explicitly. Meanwhile, BIM-based assembling collaboration is limited to represent observable, experience-able processes of design, and thus, several key socio-psychological factors, such as proposing and converging opinions and managing design process, are less activated.

Keywords

References

  1. Cuff, D. (1992). Architecture: The Story of a Practice, The MIT Press.
  2. Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., Liston, K. (2011). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors, 2nd Edition, Wiley., Sons, Inc..
  3. Fernie, J. (2006). Two Minds: Artists and Architects in Collaboration Black Dog Publishing.
  4. Hong, S. W., Jeong, Y. W., Kalay, Y. E., Jung, S. W., Lee, J. W. (2015). Enablers and Barriers of the Multi-User Virtual Environment for Exploratory Creativity in Architectural Design Collaboration. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and Arts, Online published, pp.1-20.
  5. Isikdag, U., Underwood, J. (2010). Two design patterns for facilitating Building Information Model-based synchronous collaboration, Automation in Construction, Vol. 19, pp. 544-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.11.006
  6. John, Steiner. V. (2000). Creative Collaboration, Oxford University Press.
  7. Jung, J. H., Kim, J. M., Kim, S. A. (2015). A Basic Study on the Extension of Design Information to Improve Interoperability in BIM-based Collaborative Design Process. KIBIM Magazine, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 25-34. https://doi.org/10.13161/kibim.2015.5.1.025
  8. Kalay, Y. E. (2004). Architecture's New Media: Principles, Theories, and Methods of Computer-aided Design, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  9. Kalay, Y. E. (2001). Enhancing multi-disciplinary collaboration through semantically rich representation, Automation in Construction, Vol. 10, pp. 741-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(00)00091-1
  10. Kalay, Y. E. (1997). P3: An Integrated Environment to Support Design Collaboration. ACADIA' 97, pp. 191-205.
  11. Lee, G. H., Kim, J. H., Kim, J. J. (2012). A Study of Collaboration in BIM based Architecture Schematic Design Process. KIBIM Conference 2012, pp.83-84.
  12. Miettinen, R., Paavola, S. (2014). Beyond the BIM utopia: Approaches to the development and implementation of building information modeling. Automation in Construction, Vol. 43, pp. 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.03.009
  13. Neff, G., Fiore, Silfvast. B., Dossick, C. S. (2010). A case study of the failure of digital communication to cross knowledge boudaries in virtual construction, Inf. Commun. Soc., Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 556-573. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691181003645970
  14. Oh, M. H., Lee, J. W., Hong, S. W., Jeong, Y. W. (2015). Integrated System for BIM-based Collaborative Design. Journal 44 of KIBIM Vol.7, No.1 (2017).
  15. Automation in Construction, Vol. 58, pp. 196-206.
  16. Paulus, P. B., Brown, V., Ortega, A. H. (1999). Group Creativity. In R.E. Purser. A. Montuori.(Eds.), Social Creativity Volume II (pp. 151-173). New York: Hampton Press.
  17. Schrage M. (1995). No More Teams! Mastering The Dynamics of Creative Collaboration, Doubleday, NY.
  18. Singh, V., Gu, N., Wang X. (2011). A theoretical framework of a BIM-based multi-disciplinary collaboration platform. Automation in Construction, Vol. 20, pp. 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.011
  19. Won, J., Lee, G. (2016). How to tell if a BIM project is successful: A goal-driven approach. Automation in Construction, Vol. 69, pp. 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.05.022