DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Enzymatic Preparation and Antioxidant Activities of Protein Hydrolysates from Tenebrio molitor Larvae (Mealworm)

갈색거저리 유충 단백가수분해물의 제조 및 항산화 활성

  • Yu, Mi-Hee (Department of Food Science and Technology, Keimyung University) ;
  • Lee, Hyo-Seon (Department of Food Science and Technology, Keimyung University) ;
  • Cho, Hye-Rin (Department of Food Science and Technology, Keimyung University) ;
  • Lee, Syng-Ook (Department of Food Science and Technology, Keimyung University)
  • 유미희 (계명대학교 식품가공학과) ;
  • 이효선 (계명대학교 식품가공학과) ;
  • 조혜린 (계명대학교 식품가공학과) ;
  • 이승욱 (계명대학교 식품가공학과)
  • Received : 2016.11.14
  • Accepted : 2017.03.07
  • Published : 2017.04.30

Abstract

The present study was carried out to evaluate the applicability of Tenebrio molitor larvae (mealworm) as a health functional food material in order to contribute to the development of the domestic insect industry and health functional food industry. Protein hydrolysates were prepared from mealworm powder by enzymatic hydrolysis using five different proteases (alcalase, bromelain, flavourzyme, neutrase, and papain), and the hydrolysates were then tested for their antioxidant activities. Based on available amino group contents and sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analyses, mealworms treated with alcalase ($4,781.39{\mu}g/mL$), flavourzyme ($5,429.35{\mu}g/mL$), or neutrase ($3,155.55{\mu}g/mL$) for 24 h showed high degree of hydrolysis (HD) value, whereas HD values of bromelain ($1,800{\mu}g/mL$) and papain-treated ($1,782.61{\mu}g/mL$) mealworms were much lower. Protein hydrolysates showing high HD values were further separated into > 3 kDa and ${\leq}3kDa$ fractions by a centrifugal filter system and then lyophilized, and the production yields of the low molecular weight protein hydrolysates (${\leq}3kDa$) by alcalase, flavourzyme, and neutrase were 42.05%, 26.27%, and 30.01%, respectively. According to the RC_{50} values of the protein hydrolysates (${\leq}3kDa$) obtained from three different antioxidant analyses, all three hydrolysates showed similar antioxidant activities. Thus, alcalase hydrolysates showing the highest production yield of low molecular weight protein hydrolysates were further tested for their inhibitory effects on peroxidation of linoleic acid by measuring thiobarbituric acid values, and the results show that peroxidation of untreated linoleic acid increased dramatically during 6 days of incubation. However, pretreatment with the hydrolysates ($100{\sim}800{\mu}g/mL$) significantly inhibited linoleic acid peroxidation in a dose-dependent manner over 6 days.

갈색거저리유충 분말을 4%(w/v)의 기질용액으로 제조한 후, 기질대비 단백질 가수분해 효소(alcalase, flavourzyme, neutrase, bromelain, papain)를 각 1%(w/w) 첨가하여 갈색거저리 유충 단백가수분해물을 제조하였다. 24시간 반응시킨 각 효소별 가수분해물의 특성을 SDS-PAGE로 확인한 결과 alcalase 단백가수분해물의 가수분해가 우수함을 확인하였으며, available amino group의 농도는 flavourzyme, alcalase, neutrase 단백가수분해물 각각 $5,429.35{\mu}g/mL$, $4,781.39{\mu}g/mL$, $3,155.55{\mu}g/mL$의 값을 나타내 상대적으로 높은 가수분해도를 보였고, bromelain($1,800{\mu}g/mL$)과 papain($1,782.61{\mu}g/mL$)의 경우 상당히 낮은 값을 보였다. 가수분해도가 높게 나타난 3종의 단백가수분해물을 한외여과막을 통해 분자량이 3 kDa 이하로 분리한 후 동결 건조하였으며, 이 동결건조물을 이용하여 항산화 실험을 수행하였다. 갈색거저리 유충 가수분해물의 DPPH 라디칼 소거 활성은 alcalase 단백가수분해물의 $RC_{50}$값이 $339.34{\mu}g/mL$로 나타났고, flavourzyme 가수분해물 $379.35{\mu}g/mL$, neutrase 가수분해물 $398.93{\mu}g/mL$로 나타났으며, ABTS 라디칼 소거 활성은 neutrase 단백가수분해물의 $RC_{50}$값이 $29.84{\mu}g/mL$였고, alcalase $36.90{{\mu}g/mL$ 및 flavourzyme $56.03{\mu}g/mL$ 순으로 나타났다. Hydrogen peroxide 소거 활성은 alcalase 단백가수분해물의 $RC_{50}$값이 $65.97{\mu}g/mL$였고, flavourzyme $121.67{\mu}g/mL$ 및 neutrase $70.38{\mu}g/mL$의 값을 보였다. 상기 3가지 항산화 실험에서 우수한 항산화 활성을 보이며, 저분자 펩타이드 생산 효율이 가장 높았던(42.05%) alcalase 단백가수분해물을 이용해 linoleic acid에 대한 지질과산화 억제 활성을 측정한 결과, 6일 동안 $100{\sim}800{\mu}g/mL$의 농도에서 처리 농도에 의존적으로 유의적인 항산화능을 보였다.

Keywords

References

  1. van Huis A, Van Itterbeeck J, Klunder H, Mertens E, Halloran A, Muir G, Vantomme P. 2013. Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
  2. Berenbaum MR, Eisner T. 2008. Ecology. Bugs' bugs. Science 322: 52-53. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1164873
  3. Chung MY, Kwon EY, Hwang JS, Goo TW, Yun EY. 2013. Pre-treatment conditions on the powder of Tenebrio molitor for using as a novel food ingredient. J Seric Entomol Sci 51: 9-14.
  4. Yoo J, Hwang JS, Goo TW, Yun EY. 2013. Comparative analysis of nutritional and harmful components in Korean and Chinese mealworms (Tenebrio molitor). J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 42: 249-254. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2013.42.2.249
  5. Yi L, Lakemond CMM, Sagis LMC, Eisner-Schadler V, van Huis A, van Boekel MAJS. 2013. Extraction and characterisation of protein fractions from five insect species. Food Chem 141: 3341-3348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.115
  6. Cho MR, Choue R, Chung SH, Ryu JW. 1998. Effects of silkworm powder on blood glucose and lipid levels in NIDDM (Type II) patients. Korean J Nutr 31: 1139-1150.
  7. Choi JH, Kim DI, Park SH, Baek SJ, Kim NJ, Ryu KS. 2003. Development of anti-diabetes drink using with silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) extract. Korean J Seric Sci 45: 96-102.
  8. Kim HS, Seong JH, Lee YG, Xie CL, Shin JM, Yoon HD. 2010. Improvements caused by silk sericin extract derived from silkworm in blood glucose and lipid concentration in diabetic rats. Korean J Food Nutr 23: 392-398.
  9. Park JY, Heo JC, Woo SU, Yun CY, Kang SW, Hwang JS, Lee SH. 2006. Anti-inflammatory and cellular protective effects on hydrogen peroxide-induced cytotoxicity of grasshopper extracts. Korean J Food Preserv 13: 796-802.
  10. Hwang SY, Kim YB, Lee SH, Yun CY. 2005. Preventive effect of a chafer, Protaetia brevitarsis extract on carbon tetrachloride-induced liver injuries in rats. Korean J Orient Physiol Pathol 19: 1337-1343.
  11. Park DS, Yoon MA, Xu MZ, Yu H, Kim JR, Jeong TS, Park HY. 2004. Screening of anti-atherogenic substances from insect resources. Korean J Pharmacogn 35: 233-238.
  12. Lee JE, Lee AJ, Jo DE, Cho JH, Youn K, Yun EY, Hwang JS, Jun M, Kang BH. 2015. Cytotoxic effects of Tenebrio molitor Larval extracts against hepatocellular carcinoma. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 44: 200-207. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2015.44.2.200
  13. Chung SJ, Lee YH, Chung JH, Lee BR, Ham DM. 1995. Antifungal effect and activity spectrum of crude antifungal proteins from hemolymph of larvae of Tenebrio molitor in Korea. Korean J Mycol 23: 232-237.
  14. Kitts DD, Weiler K. 2003. Bioactive proteins and peptides from food sources: Applications of bioprocesses used in isolation and recovery. Curr Pharm Des 9: 1309-1323. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612033454883
  15. Pihlanto-Leppala A. 2000. Bioactive peptides derived from bovine whey proteins: opioid and ace-inhibitory peptides. Trends Food Sci Technol 11: 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(01)00003-6
  16. Arihara K, Nakashima Y, Mukai T, Ishikawa S, Itoh M. 2001. Peptide inhibitors for angiotensin I-converting enzyme from enzymatic hydrolysates of porcine skeletal muscle proteins. Meat Sci 57: 319-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00108-X
  17. Pihlanto A. 2006. Antioxidative peptides derived from milk proteins. Int Dairy J 16: 1306-1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2006.06.005
  18. Mine Y, Ma F, Lauriau S. 2004. Antimicrobial peptides released by enzymatic hydrolysis of hen egg white lysozyme. J Agric Food Chem 52: 1088-1094. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0345752
  19. Lee SH, Song KB. 2003. Isolation of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitory peptide from irradiated bovine blood plasma protein hydrolysates. J Food Sci 68: 2469-2472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb07047.x
  20. Chabance B, Jolles P, Izquierdo C, Mazoyer E, Francoual C, Drouet L, Fiat AM. 1995. Characterization of an antithrombotic peptide from ${\kappa}$-casein in newborn plasma after milk ingestion. Br J Nutr 73: 583-590. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19950060
  21. Pan D, Lu H, Zeng X. 2013. A newly isolated Ca binding peptide from whey protein. Int J Food Prop 16: 1127-1134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2011.576361
  22. Choi DW, Kim NH, Song KB. 2013. Isolation of iron-binding peptides from sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seed protein hydrolysates. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 42: 1162-1166. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2013.42.7.1162
  23. Ham H, Woo KS, Lee B, Park JY, Sim EY, Kim BJ, Lee C, Kim SJ, Kim WH, Lee J, Lee YY. 2015. Antioxidant compounds and activities of methanolic extracts from oat cultivars. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 44: 1660-1665. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2015.44.11.1660
  24. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C. 1999. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radicals Biol Med 26: 1231-1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3
  25. Muller HE. 1985. Detection of hydrogen peroxide produced by microorganisms on an ABTS peroxidase medium. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A 259: 151-154.
  26. Finkel T, Holbrook NJ. 2000. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature 408: 239-247. https://doi.org/10.1038/35041687
  27. Martindale JL, Holbrook NJ. 2002. Cellular response to oxidative stress: signaling for suicide and survival. J Cell Physiol 192: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.10119
  28. Yu JS, Woo KS, Hwang IG, Lee YR, Kang TS, Jeong HS. 2008. ACE inhibitory and antioxidative activities of silkworm larvae (Bombyx mori) hydrolysate. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 37: 136-140. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2008.37.2.136
  29. Kim HA, Park SH, Lee SS, Choi YJ. 2015. Anti-wrinkle effects of enzymatic oyster hydrolysate and its fractions on human fibroblasts. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 44: 1645-1652. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2015.44.11.1645
  30. Yoon WJ, Lee JA, Kim JY, Kim SB, Park SY. 2007. Antioxidant activity and physiological function of the Anomala albopilosa extracts. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 36: 670-677. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2007.36.6.670
  31. Lee SG, Yu MH, Lee SP, Lee IS. 2008. Antioxidant activities and induction of apoptosis by methanol extracts from avocado. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 37: 269-275. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2008.37.3.269
  32. Hwang ES, Nhuan DT. 2014. Antioxidant contents and antioxidant activities of hot-water extracts of aronia (Aronia melancocarpa) with different drying methods. Korean J Food Sci Technol 46: 303-308. https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2014.46.3.303
  33. Lee SH, Lee SO. 2016. Polyphenol contents and antioxidant activities of lentil extracts from different cultivars. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 45: 973-979. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2016.45.7.973
  34. Kim SK, Choi YR, Park PJ, Choi JH, Moon SH. 2000. Purification and characterization of antioxidative peptides from enzymatic hydrolysate of cod teiset protein. J Korean Fish Soc 33: 198-204.

Cited by

  1. 쌍별귀뚜라미 단백가수분해물의 제조 및 항산화 활성 vol.51, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.9721/kjfst.2019.51.5.473
  2. 식용곤충별 단백가수분해물의 항산화 활성 비교 vol.51, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9721/kjfst.2019.51.5.480
  3. 식용곤충 분리단백의 특성 및 활용연구 vol.51, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9721/kjfst.2019.51.6.537
  4. Aeration 공정 처리가 홍삼분말 추출물의 프로사포게닌의 함량 변화와 항산화 활성에 미치는 영향 vol.51, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.9721/kjfst.2019.51.6.576
  5. Effects of mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) larvae hydrolysate on nutrient ileal digestibility in growing pigs compared to those of defatted mealworm larvae meal, fermented poultry by-product, and hydrolyz vol.33, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0793
  6. Antioxidant activities of flower, berry and leaf of Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer vol.52, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.9721/kjfst.2020.52.4.342
  7. Anti-oxidant and Moisturizing Effects of Oil Extracted from Tenebrio molitor Larvae vol.18, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.20402/ajbc.2020.0036
  8. Anti-Browning Effect of Plum Seed Extracts from Different Cultivars vol.50, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2021.50.4.362
  9. Perspective on integrated biorefinery for valorization of biomass from the edible insect Tenebrio molitor vol.116, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.07.012
  10. Physicochemical Characteristics and Antioxidative Activities of Tenebrio Molitor Larvae Hydrolysates with Different Extraction Methods vol.32, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7856/kjcls.2021.32.4.599