DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

In vitro comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of HyFlex EDM, One G, and ProGlider nickel titanium glide path instruments in single and double curvature canals

  • Yilmaz, Koray (Corum Oral and Dental Health Center) ;
  • Uslu, Gulsah (Department of Endodontics, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Dentistry) ;
  • Ozyurek, Taha (Department of Endodontics, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2017.04.24
  • Accepted : 2017.09.03
  • Published : 2017.11.08

Abstract

Objectives: It was aimed to compare the cyclic fatigue resistances of ProGlider (PG), One G (OG), and HyFlex EDM (HEDM) nickel titanium glide path files in single- and double-curved artificial canals. Materials and Methods: 40 PG (16/0.02), 40 OG (14/0.03), and 40 HEDM (10/0.05) single-file glide path files were used in the present study. Sixty files were subjected to cyclic fatigue test by using double-curved canals and 60 files by using single-curved canal (n = 20). The number of cycles to fracture (NCF) was calculated and the length of the fractured fragment (FL) was determined by a digital micro-caliper. Twelve pieces of fractured files were examined with scanning electron microscope to determine fracture types of the files (n = 2). The NCF and the FL data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey test using SPSS 21 software (p < 0.05). Results: In all of the groups, NCF values were significantly lower in double-curved canals when compared to single-curved canals (p < 0.05). For both of single- and double-curved canals, NCF values of HEDM group in apical and coronal curvatures were found to be significantly higher than NCF values of PG and OG groups (p < 0.05). In both of single- and double-curved canals, NCF value of PG group was found significantly higher than OG group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, HEDM glide path files were found to have the highest cyclic fatigue resistance in both of single- and double-curved canals.

Keywords

References

  1. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004;30:559-567. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000129039.59003.9D
  2. Walia HM, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 1988;14:346-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80196-1
  3. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod 2000;26:161-165. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200003000-00008
  4. Cheung GS. Instrument fracture: mechanisms, removal of fragments, and clinical outcomes. Endod Topics 2007;16:1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2009.00239.x
  5. Patino PV, Biedma BM, Liebana CR, Cantatore G, Bahillo JG. The influence of a manual glide path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments. J Endod 2005;31:114-116.
  6. Ha JH, Park SS. Influence of glide path on the screw-in effect and torque of nickel-titanium rotary files in simulated resin root canals. Restor Dent Endod 2012;37:215-219. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2012.37.4.215
  7. Gambarini G, Grande NM, Plotino G, Somma F, Garala M, De Luca M, Testarelli L. Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by new manufacturing methods. J Endod 2008;34:1003-1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.05.007
  8. Dentsply: Pro.$glider^{TM}$. Available from: http://www.dentsplymea.com/sites/default/files/211%20Proglider%20Brochure%20FINAL.pdf (updated 2017 Jan 1).
  9. Micro Mega: One G. Available from: http://micro-mega.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/OneG_EN1_15_web.pdf (updated 2017 Jan 1).
  10. Coltene: $HyFlex^{(R)}$ EDM. Available from: https://www.coltene.com/fileadmin/Data/EN/Products/Endodontics/Root_Canal_Shaping/HyFlex_EDM/31328A_HyFlexEDM_Brochure_US.pdf (updated 2017 Jan 1).
  11. Al-Sudani D, Grande NM, Plotino G, Pompa G, Di Carlo S, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. Cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in a double (S-shaped) simulated curvature. J Endod 2012;38:987-989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.03.025
  12. Neelakantan P, Reddy P, Gutmann JL. Cyclic fatigue of two different single files with varying kinematics in a simulated double-curved canal. J Investig Clin Dent 2016;7:272-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12159
  13. Topcuoglu HS, Duzgun S, Akti A, Topcuoglu G. Laboratory comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne Gold, Reciproc and WaveOne files in canals with a double curvature. Int Endod J 2017;50:713-717. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12674
  14. Berutti E, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, Chiandussi G, Pera F, Migliaretti G, Pasqualini D. Use of nickel-titanium rotary PathFile to create the glide path: comparison with manual preflaring in simulated root canals. J Endod 2009;35:408-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.11.021
  15. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL Jr. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 1997;23:77-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80250-6
  16. Plotino G, Grande NM, Sorci E, Malagnino VA, Somma F. A comparison of cyclic fatigue between used and new Mtwo Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Int Endod J 2006;39:716-723. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01142.x
  17. Topcuoglu HS, Topcuoglu G, Akti A, Duzgun S. In vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Next, HyFlex CM, OneShape, and ProTaper Universal Instruments in a canal with a double curvature. J Endod 2016;42:969-971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.010
  18. Versluis A, Kim HC, Lee W, Kim BM, Lee CJ. Flexural stiffness and stresses in nickel-titanium rotary files for various pitch and cross-sectional geometries. J Endod 2012;38:1399-1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.008
  19. Arias A, Perez-Higueras JJ, de la Macorra JC. Influence of clinical usage of GT and GTX files on cyclic fatigue resistance. Int Endod J 2014;47:257-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12141
  20. Frick CP, Ortega AM, Tyber J, Maksound AE, Maier HJ, Liu Y, Gall K. Thermal processing of polycrystalline NiTi shape memory alloys. Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater 2005;405:34-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.05.102
  21. Braga LC, Faria Silva AC, Buono VT, de Azevedo Bahia MG. Impact of heat treatments on the fatigue resistance of different rotary nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2014;40:1494-1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.03.007
  22. Capar ID, Kaval ME, Ertas H, Sen BH. Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of 5 different rotary pathfinding instruments made of conventional nickel-titanium wire, M-wire, and controlled memory wire. J Endod 2015;41:535-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.11.008
  23. Capar ID, Ertas H, Arslan H. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium coronal flaring instruments. J Endod 2014;40:1182-1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.031
  24. Plotino G, Testarelli L, Al-Sudani D, Pongione G, Grande NM, Gambarini G. Fatigue resistance of rotary instruments manufactured using different nickel-titanium alloys: a comparative study. Odontology 2014;102:31-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-012-0088-8
  25. Pongione G, Pompa G, Milana V, Di Carlo S, Giansiracusa A, Nicolini E, De Angelis F. Flexibility and resistance to cyclic fatigue of endodontic instruments made with different nickel-titanium alloys: a comparative test. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2012;3:119-122.
  26. Capar ID, Ertas H, Arslan H. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of novel nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Aust Endod J 2015;41:24-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12067
  27. Uslu G, Ozyurek T, Inan U. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProGlider and One G glide path files. J Endod 2016;42:1555-1558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.07.012
  28. Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S, Namerow K. Comparison between a novel nickel-titanium alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of ProFile 25/.04 rotary instruments. J Endod 2008;34:1406-1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.029
  29. Shen Y, Hieawy A, Huang X, Wang ZJ, Maezono H, Haapasalo M. Fatigue resistance of a 3-dimensional conforming nickel-titanium rotary instrument in double curvatures. J Endod 2016;42:961-964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.02.012

Cited by

  1. Comparison of postoperative pain intensity after using reciprocating and continuous rotary glide path systems: a randomized clinical trial vol.44, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2019.44.e9
  2. Torsional fatigue strength of reciprocating and rotary pathfinding instruments manufactured from different NiTi alloys vol.33, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0097
  3. Cyclic fatigue resistance of the WaveOne Gold Glider, ProGlider, and the One G glide path instruments in double-curvature canals vol.44, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2019.44.e36
  4. Comparison of torque, force generation and canal shaping ability between manual and nickel-titanium glide path instruments in rotary and optimum glide path motion vol.108, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-019-00455-1
  5. Cyclic Fatigue of TruNatomy Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instrument in Single and Double Curvature Canals: A Comparative Study vol.12, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1793
  6. Combination of a new ultrasonic tip with rotary systems for the preparation of flattened root canals vol.46, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e56