The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Acid etching of glass-infiltrated zirconia and its biological response

  • Vu, Van Thi (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Gye-Jeong (RIS Foundation for Advanced Biomaterial, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Yun, Kwi-Dug (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Lim, Hyun-Pil (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Nguyen, Thao Phuong Thi (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Sang-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • Received : 2016.06.15
  • Accepted : 2016.12.20
  • Published : 2017.04.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of acid etching treatment on surface characteristics and biological response of glass-infiltrated zirconia. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A hundred zirconia specimens were divided into four groups depending on surface treatments: untreated zirconia (group Z); acid-etched zirconia (group ZE); glass-infiltrated zirconia (group ZG); and glass-infiltrated and acid-etched zirconia (group ZGE). Surface roughness, surface topography, surface morphology, and Vickers hardness of specimens were evaluated. For biological response test, MC3T3-E1 cell attachment and proliferation on surface of the specimens were examined. The data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS. Group ZGE showed the highest surface roughness ($Ra=1.54{\mu}m$) compared with other groups (P < .05). Meanwhile, the hardness of group Z was significantly higher than those of other groups (P < .05). Cell attachment and cell proliferation were significantly higher in group ZGE (P < .05). CONCLUSION. We concluded that effective surface roughness on zirconia could be made by acid etching treatment after glass infiltration. This surface showed significantly enhanced osteoblast cell response.

Keywords

References

  1. Kelly JR, Denry I. Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic: an overview. Dent Mater 2008;24:289-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.005
  2. Zarone F, Russo S, Sorrentino R. From porcelain-fused-to metal to zirconia: clinical and experimental considerations. Dent Mater 2011;27:83-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.024
  3. Uo M, Sjogren G, Sundh A, Watari F, Bergman M, Lerner U. Cytotoxicity and bonding property of dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19:487-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00094-5
  4. Yamashita D, Machigashira M, Miyamoto M, Takeuchi H, Noguchi K, Izumi Y, Ban S. Effect of surface roughness on initial responses of osteoblast-like cells on two types of zirconia. Dent Mater 2009;28:461-70. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.461
  5. Bachle M, Butz F, Hubner U, Bakalinis E, Kohal RJ. Behavior of CAL72 osteoblast-like cells cultured on zirconia ceramics with different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:53-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01292.x
  6. Ewais OH, Al AF, Ghoneim MM, Aboushelib MN. Novel zirconia surface treatments for enhanced osseointegration: laboratory characterization. Int J Dent 2014;2014:203940.
  7. Schwartz Z, Boyan BD, Underlying mechanisms at the bonebiomaterial interface. J Cell Biochem1994;56:340-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.240560310
  8. Krajewski A, Malavolti R, Piancastelli A. Albumin adhesion on some biological and non-biological glasses and connection with their Z-potentials. Biomaterials 1996;17:53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(96)80755-1
  9. Hench LL. The story of Bioglass. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 2006;17:967-978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0432-z
  10. Kristen A, Hausmann A, Weber M, Fisher J, Fisher H. Bioactive and thermally compatible glass coating on zirconia dental implants. J Dent Res 2015;94:297-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514559250
  11. Srikanth R, Kosmac T, Bona AD, Yin L, Zhang Y. Effects of cementation surface modifications on fracture resistance of zirconia. Dent Mater 2015;31:435-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.013
  12. Suresh S. Graded materials for resistance to contact deformation and damage. Science 2001;292:2447-51. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059716
  13. Iwaya Y, Machigashira M, Kanbara K, MiyamotoM, Noguchi K, Izumi Y, Ban S. Surface properties and biocompatibility of acid-etched titanium. Dent Mater 2008;27:415-21. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.415
  14. Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, Smith R. Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now? Dent Mater 2011;27:71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.022
  15. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:268-74. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.50
  16. Canay S, Hersek N, Ertan A. Effect of different acid treatments on a porcelain surface. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:95-101. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00626.x
  17. Borges GA, Sophr AM, de Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DC. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:479-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(02)52704-9
  18. Pisani-Proenca J, Erhardt MC, Valandro LF, Gutierrez-Aceves G, Bolanos-Carmona MV, Del Castillo-Salmeron R, Bottino MA. Influence of ceramic surface conditioning and resin cements on microtensile bond strength to a glass ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:412-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.09.023
  19. Sykaras N, Iacopino AM, Marker VA, Triplett RG, Woody RD. Implant materials, designs, and surface topographies: their effect on osseointegration. A literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:675-90.
  20. Bona A, DonassolloTA, Demarco FF, Barrett AA, Mecholsky JJ Jr. Characterization and surface treatment effects on topography of a glass-infiltrated alumina/zirconia-reinforced ceramic. Dent Mater 2007;23:769-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.043
  21. Flury S, Peuzfeldt A, Lussi A. Influence of surface roughness on mechanical properties of two computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic materials. Oper Dent 2012;37:617-24. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-391-L
  22. Keshavarz M, Idris MH, Ahmad N. Mechanical properties of stabilized zirconia nanocrystalline EB-PVD coating evaluated by micro and nanoindentation. J Adv Ceram 2013;2:333-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-013-0080-y
  23. Jamie JK, Robert OR. Determining the toughness of ceramics from Vickers indentation using the crack-opening displacements: an experimental study. J Am Ceram Soc 2003;86: 1433-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03490.x
  24. Zhang Y, Ma L. Optimizaion of ceramic strength using elastic gradients. Acta Mater 2009;57:2721-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.037
  25. Zhang Y, Sun MJ, Zhang DZ. Designing functionally graded materials with superior load bearing properties. Acta Biomater 2012;8:1101-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.033
  26. Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials 2000;21:667-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00242-2
  27. Carlsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T, Branemark PI. Osseointegration of titanium implants. Acta Orthop Scand 1986;57:285-9. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678608994393
  28. Bowers KT, Keller JC, Randolph BA, Wick DG, Michaels CM. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:302-10.
  29. Teughels W, Van AN. Effect of material characteristics and/surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:68-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01353.x
  30. Abbasi Z, Bahrololoom ME, Shariat MH, Bagheri R. Bioactive glasses in dentistry: a review. J Dent Biomater 2015;2:1-9.
  31. Melchers S, Uesbeck T, Winter O, Eckert H, Eder D. Effect of aluminum ion incorporation on the bioactivity and structure in mesoporous bioactive glasses. Chem Mater 2016;28: 3254-64. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04117

Cited by

  1. Bond and topography evaluation of a Y-TZP ceramic with a superficial low-fusing porcelain glass layer after different hydrofluoric acid etching protocols pp.0101-1774, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.10118
  2. Zirconia-Based Biomaterials for Hard Tissue Reconstruction vol.9, pp.1179-061X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1179061X18767886
  3. Enhanced Cell Response to Zirconia Surface Immobilized with Type I Collagen pp.1544-0591, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034519828702