DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Tooth surface treatment strategies for adhesive cementation

  • Rohr, Nadja (Division of Dental Materials and Engineering, Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Temporomandibular Disorders, University Center for Dental Medicine, University of Basel) ;
  • Fischer, Jens (Division of Dental Materials and Engineering, Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Temporomandibular Disorders, University Center for Dental Medicine, University of Basel)
  • Received : 2016.07.08
  • Accepted : 2016.11.30
  • Published : 2017.04.28

Abstract

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of tooth surface pre-treatment steps on shear bond strength, which is essential for understanding the adhesive cementation process. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Shear bond strengths of different cements with various tooth surface treatments (none, etching, priming, or etching and priming) on enamel and dentin of human teeth were measured using the Swiss shear test design. Three adhesives (Permaflo DC, Panavia F 2.0, and Panavia V5) and one self-adhesive cement (Panavia SA plus) were included in this study. The interface of the cement and the tooth surface with the different pre-treatments was analyzed using SEM. pH values of the cements and primers were measured. RESULTS. The highest bond strength values for all cements were achieved with etching and primer on enamel ($25.6{\pm}5.3-32.3{\pm}10.4MPa$). On dentin, etching and priming produced the highest bond strength values for all cements ($8.6{\pm}2.9-11.7{\pm}3.5MPa$) except for Panavia V5, which achieved significantly higher bond strengths when pre-treated with primer only ($15.3{\pm}4.1MPa$). Shear bond strength values were correlated with the micro-retentive surface topography of enamel and the tag length on dentin except for Panavia V5, which revealed the highest bond strength with primer application only without etching, resulting in short but sturdy tags. CONCLUSION. The highest bond strength can be achieved for Panavia F 2.0, Permaflo DC, and Panavia SA plus when the tooth substrate is previously etched and the respective primer is applied. The new cement Panavia V5 displayed low technique-sensitivity and attained significantly higher adhesion of all tested cements to dentin when only primer was applied.

Keywords

References

  1. Edelhoff D, Ozcan M. To what extent does the longevity of fixed dental prostheses depend on the function of the cement? Working Group 4 materials: cementation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:193-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01442.x
  2. Federlin M, Sipos C, Hiller KA, Thonemann B, Schmalz G. Partial ceramic crowns. Influence of preparation design and luting material on margin integrity-a scanning electron microscopic study. Clin Oral Investig 2005;9:8-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-004-0276-1
  3. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-35.
  4. Salvio LA, Hipolito VD, Martins AL, de Goes MF. Hybridization quality and bond strength of adhesive systems according to interaction with dentin. Eur J Dent 2013;7:315-26. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.115416
  5. Monticelli F, Osorio R, Mazzitelli C, Ferrari M, Toledano M. Limited decalcification/diffusion of self-adhesive cements into dentin. J Dent Res 2008;87:974-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808701012
  6. Al-Assaf K, Chakmakchi M, Palaghias G, Karanika-Kouma A, Eliades G. Interfacial characteristics of adhesive luting resins and composites with dentine. Dent Mater 2007;23:829-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.023
  7. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:251-8.
  8. Stape TH, Menezes Mde S, Barreto Bde C, Naves LZ, Aguiar FH, Quagliatto PS, Martins LR. Influence of chlorhexidine on dentin adhesive interface micromorphology and nanoleakage expression of resin cements. Microsc Res Tech 2013;76: 788-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22230
  9. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004;83:454-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300604
  10. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400204
  11. Turp V, Sen D, Tuncelli B, Ozcan M. Adhesion of 10-MDP containing resin cements to dentin with and without the etchand-rinse technique. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:226-33. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.226
  12. Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent 1989;17:61-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(89)90131-0
  13. Holderegger C, Sailer I, Schuhmacher C, Schlapfer R, Hammerle C, Fischer J. Shear bond strength of resin cements to human dentin. Dent Mater 2008;24:944-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.021
  14. Stawarczyk B, Hartmann R, Hartmann L, Roos M, Ozcan M, Sailer I, Hammerle CH. The effect of dentin desensitizer on shear bond strength of conventional and self-adhesive resin luting cements after aging. Oper Dent 2011;36:492-501. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-292-L
  15. Bahr N, Keul C, Edelhoff D, Eichberger M, Roos M, Gernet W, Stawarczyk B. Effect of different adhesives combined with two resin composite cements on shear bond strength to polymeric CAD/CAM materials. Dent Mater J 2013;32:492-501. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2012-329
  16. Lopes GC, Thys DG, Klaus P, Oliveira GM, Widmer N. Enamel acid etching: a review. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007;28:18-24.
  17. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Heymann HO, Ritter AV. Shear bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives to moist enamel. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:103-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00384.x
  18. Federlin M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Effect of selective enamel etching on clinical performance of CAD/CAM partial ceramic crowns luted with a self-adhesive resin cement. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1975-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1173-2
  19. Baader K, Hiller KA, Buchalla W, Schmalz G, Federlin M. Self-adhesive luting of partial ceramic crowns: Selective enamel etching leads to higher survival after 6.5 years in vivo. J Adhes Dent 2016;18:69-79.
  20. Jacobsen T, Soderholm KJ. Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 1995;11:132-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80048-4
  21. Vogl V, Hiller KA, Buchalla W, Federlin M, Schmalz G. Controlled, prospective, randomized, clinical split-mouth evaluation of partial ceramic crowns luted with a new, universal adhesive system/resin cement: results after 18 months. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:2481-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1779-2

Cited by

  1. Effect of aging and curing mode on the compressive and indirect tensile strength of resin composite cements vol.13, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-017-0155-z
  2. Cementation of Full Coverage Metal Crowns in Dogs vol.35, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/0898756418757247
  3. The effect of air-particle abrasion and a zirconia primer application on resin cement bonding strength to zirconia vol.68, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.23736/s0026-4970.18.04217-6
  4. Longevity of indirect restorations cemented with self‐adhesive resin luting with and without selective enamel etching. A Systematic review and meta‐analysis vol.31, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12504
  5. Adhesive Systems Used in Indirect Restorations Cementation: Review of the Literature vol.7, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7030071
  6. Adhesion of Two New Glass Fiber Post Systems Cemented with Self-Adhesive Resin Cements vol.7, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7030080
  7. Synchrotron IR-microspectroscopy-based visualization of molecular and chemical interactions between dental cement, biomimetic composite and native dental tissue vol.2019, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.24075/brsmu.2019.047
  8. Comparison of the Effect of Proanthocyanidin Surface Treatments on Shear Bond Strength of Different Cements vol.12, pp.17, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172676
  9. HF etching of CAD/CAM materials: influence of HF concentration and etching time on shear bond strength vol.15, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-019-0206-8
  10. Enhancement of dentin bond strength of resin cement using new resin coating materials vol.38, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-328
  11. Influence of Material and Surface Roughness of Resin Composite Cements on Fibroblast Behavior vol.45, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2341/19-113-l
  12. Shear force comparative evaluation for surface treated and non- treated 3D interim printed materials with different types of glass-ionomer cements vol.12, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.57003