DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Conservation of indigenous cattle genetic resources in Southern Africa's smallholder areas: turning threats into opportunities - A review

  • Nyamushamba, G.B. (Department of Livestock and Pasture Science, University of Fort Hare) ;
  • Mapiye, C. (Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University) ;
  • Tada, O. (Department of Animal Production and Technology, Chinhoyi University of Technology) ;
  • Halimani, T.E. (Department of Animal Science, University of Zimbabwe) ;
  • Muchenje, V. (Department of Livestock and Pasture Science, University of Fort Hare)
  • Received : 2016.01.08
  • Accepted : 2016.03.18
  • Published : 2017.05.01

Abstract

The current review focuses on characterization and conservation efforts vital for the development of breeding programmes for indigenous beef cattle genetic resources in Southern Africa. Indigenous African cattle breeds were identified and characterized using information from refereed journals, conference papers and research reports. Results of this current review reviewed that smallholder beef cattle production in Southern Africa is extensive and dominated by indigenous beef cattle strains adaptable to the local environment. The breeds include Nguni, Mashona, Tuli, Malawi Zebu, Bovino de Tete, Angoni, Landim, Barotse, Twsana and Ankole. These breeds have important functions ranging from provision of food and income to socio-economic, cultural and ecological roles. They also have adaptive traits ranging from drought tolerant, resistance to ticks and tick borne diseases, heat tolerance and resistance to trypanosomosis. Stakeholders in the conservation of beef cattle were also identified and they included farmers, national government, research institutes and universities as well as breeding companies and societies in Southern Africa. Research efforts made to evaluate threats and opportunities of indigenous beef cattle production systems, assess the contribution of indigenous cattle to household food security and income, genetically and phenotypically characterize and conserve indigenous breeds, and develop breeding programs for smallholder beef production are highlighted. Although smallholder beef cattle production in the smallholder farming systems contributes substantially to household food security and income, their productivity is hindered by several constraints that include high prevalence of diseases and parasites, limited feed availability and poor marketing. The majority of the African cattle populations remain largely uncharacterized although most of the indigenous cattle breeds have been identified.

Keywords

References

  1. Thornton PK. Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects. Phil Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 2010;365:2853-67. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0134
  2. Hoffmann I. Climate change and the characterization, breeding and conservation of animal genetic resources. Anim Genet 2010;41:32-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02043.x
  3. Kohler-Rollerfson I. Farm animal genetic resources: Safeguarding national assets for food security and trade. Summary Publication about four Workshops on Animal Genetic Resources held in the SADC Region. FAO/GTZ/CTA; 2004.
  4. Khombe CT 2002. Genetic improvement of indigenous cattle breeds in Zimbabwe: A case study of the Mashona group breeding scheme. http://agtr.ilri.cgiar.org/index.php?option=comcontent&task=view&id=82&Itemid=99
  5. Scholtz MM, Bester J, Mamabolo JM, Ramsay KA. Results of the national cattle survey undertaken in South Africa, with emphasis on beef. Appl Anim Husb Rural Dev 2008;1:1-9.
  6. MacNeil MD, Matjuda LE. Breeding objectives for Angus and Charolais specialized sire lines for use in the emerging sector of South African beef production. S Afr J Anim Sci 2007;37:1-10.
  7. Intenrnational Livestock Research Institute. Climate, livestock and poverty. Challenges at the interface. Corpkorate report. 2008-2009; Intenrnational Livestock Research Institute, 2008.
  8. FAO. In: Rischkowsky B, Pilling D, editors. The state of the world's animal genetic resources for food and agriculture. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2007. p. 511.
  9. Bayer W, Alcock R, Gilles P. Going backwards? Moving forward? - Nguni cattle in communal KwaZulu-Natal. "Rural Poverty Reduction through Research for Development". Deutscher Tropentag, Berlin; 2004.
  10. Rege JEO. The state of African cattle genetic resources I. Classification framework and identification of threatened and extinct breeds. Anim Genet Resour 1999;25:1-25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1014233900003448
  11. Rege JEO, Ayalew W, Getahun E, et al. Domestic Animal Genetic Resources Information System (DAGRIS). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: International Livestock Research Institute; 2007.
  12. Rewe TO, Herold P, Kahi AK, Zarate AV. Breeding indigenous cattle genetic resources for beef production in Sub-Saharan Africa. Outlook Agric 2009;38:317-26. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000009790422205
  13. Hanotte O, Tawah CL, Bradley DG, et al. Geographic distribution and frequency of a taurine Bos taurus and an indicine Bos indicus Y specific allele amongst sub-Saharan African cattle breeds. Mol Ecol 2000;9:387-96. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00858.x
  14. Schoeman SJ. Review: Recent research into the production potential of indigenous cattle with specific reference to Sanga. S Afr J Anim Sci 1989;19:55-61.
  15. Halimani TE, Muchadeyi FC, Chimonyo M, Dzama K. Pig genetic resource conservation: The Southern African perspective. Ecol Econ 2010;69:944-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.01.005
  16. Mapiye C, Chimonyo M, Dzama K, Raats JG, Mapekula M. Opportunities for improving Nguni cattle production in the smallholder farming systems of South Africa. Livest Sci 2009;24:196-204.
  17. Bessa, I, Pinheiro I, Matola M, et al. Genetic diversity and relationships among indigenous Mozambican cattle breeds. S Afr J Anim Sci 2009;39:1.
  18. Hanotte O, Dessie T, Kemp S. Time to tap Africa's livestock genomes. Washington: Science 2010;328:1640-1. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186254
  19. Musemwa L, Mushunje A, Chimonyo M, Mapiye C. Low cattle market off-take rates in communal production systems of South Africa: Causes and mitigation strategies. J Sust Dev Afr 2010;12:1520-39.
  20. Mapiye C, Chimonyo M, Muchenje V, et al. Potential for valueaddition of Nguni cattle products in the communal areas of South Africa. Afr J Agric Res 2007;2:488-95.
  21. Musemwa L, Mushunje A, Chimonyo M, et al. Nguni cattle marketing constraints and opportunities in the communal areas of South Africa: review. Afr J Agric Res 2008;3:239-45.
  22. Shackleton CM, Shackleton SE, Netshiluvhi TR, Mathabela FR, Phiri C. The direct use value of goods and services attributed to cattle and goats in the Sand River Catchment, Bushbuckridge. No. ENV-P-C 99003, CSIR, Pretoria; 1999.
  23. Dovie DBK, Shackleton CM, Witkowski ETF. Valuation of communal area livestock benefits, rural livelihoods and related policy issues. Land Use Policy 2006;23:260-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.004
  24. Simela L, Montshwe BD, Mahanjana AM, Tshuwa MP. The livestock production environment in the South African smallholder sector. New challenges for the animal science industries. SASAS 41st Congress Abstracts; 2006. p. 66.
  25. FAO. Marker assisted selection "Current status and future perspectives in crops, livestock, forestry and fish". Rome, Italy Food and Agricultural Organisation 2006 Sub-regional report on animal genetic resources: Southern Africa. Annex to the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2007. p. 1-37.
  26. Chimonyo M, Kusina NT, Hamudikuwanda H, Nyoni O. Reproductive performance and body weight changes in draught cows in a smallholder semi-arid farming area of Zimbabwe. Trop Anim Health Prod 2000;32:405-15. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005285720169
  27. Ejlertsen M, Poole J, Marshall K. Traditional breeding objectives and practices of goat, sheep and cattle smallholders in the Gambia and implications in relation to the design of breeding interventions. Trop Anim Health Prod 2012;45:219-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0194-1
  28. Chimonyo M, Kusina NT, Hamudikuwanda H, Nyoni O, Ncube I. Effects of dietary supplementation and work stress on ovarian activity in non-lactating Mashona cows in a smallholder farming area of Zimbabwe. Anim Sci 2000;70:317-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800054771
  29. Peco B, Sanchez AM, Azcarate FM. Abandonment in grazing systems: consequences for vegetation and soil. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2006;113:284-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.09.017
  30. Aboud AA, Kisoyan PK, Said MY, et al. Natural resource management and biodiversity conservation in the drylands of eastern and central Africa. Entebbe, Uganda: ASARECA; 2012.
  31. Huntsinger L, Sayre NF, Wulfhorst JD. Birds, beasts and bovines: three cases of pastoralism and wildlife in the USA. Pastoralism 2012;2:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-7136-2-12
  32. García RR, Fraser MD, Celaya R, et al. Grazing land management and biodiversity in the Atlantic European heathlands: a review. Agroforest Syst 2013;87:19-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9519-3
  33. Fabre P, Guerin G, Bouquet PM. The management of natural areas by pastoralism. A French mediterranean example: the Merinos d'Arles in transhumance. Rambouillet, France: In: Proceedings of the 8th World Merino Conference, 2010.
  34. Kugler K, Broxham E. The ecological value of free-ranging livestock. Safeguard for Agricultural Varieties in Europe, 2013.
  35. FAO. The nature of ecosystem services provided by livestock species and breeds. Intergovernmental Technical Working Group on Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Eighth Session. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2014. pp. 26-8.
  36. Hatfield P, Goosey H, Lenssen A, Blodgett S. Sheep grazing to manage crop residues, insects and weeds in northern plains grain and alfalfa systems. SARE. c2011. Available from: http://www.sare.org/Learning-Center/Fact-Sheets/National-SARE-Fact-Sheets/Sheep-Grazingto-Manage-Crop-Residues-Insects-and-Weeds-in-Northern-Plains-Grain-and-Alfalfa-Systems. c2011. Available from: www.sare.org/publications/factsheet/pdf/11AGI2011.pdf
  37. Kugonza DR, Nabasirye M, Mpairwe D, Hanotte O, Okeyo AM. Productivity and morphology of Ankole cattle in three livestock production systems in Uganda. Anim Genet Res 2011;48:13-22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633611000038
  38. Terefe E, Haile A, Mulatu W, Dessie T, Mwai O. Phenotypic characteristics and trypanosome prevalence of Mursi cattle breed in the Bodi and Mursi districts of South Omo Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod 2015;47:485-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-014-0746-7
  39. Mirkena T, Duguma G, Haile A, et al. Genetics of adaptation in domestic farm animals: a review. Livest Sci 2010;132:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.05.003
  40. Seifert GW, Hofmeyr JH, Meyer EHH. South African Stud Book and Livestock Improvement Association. Proceedings of the 2nd World. Congress on Sheep and Beef Cattle Breeding. Bloemfontein, Pretoria, South Africa: South African Stud Book and Livestock Improvement Association; 1984.
  41. Shabtay A. Adaptive traits of indigenous cattle breeds: The Mediterranean Baladi as a case study. Meat Sci 2015;109:27-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.05.014
  42. Jonsson NN. The productivity effects of cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) infestation on cattle, with particular reference to Bos indicus cattle and their crosses. Vet Parasitol 2006;137:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.01.010
  43. Collins-Lusweti E. Performance of Nguni Afrikaner and Bonsmara cattle under drought conditions in the North West Province of Southern Africa. S Afr J Anim Sci 2000;30:33.
  44. Otto F, Vilela F, Harun M, et al. Biochemical blood profile of Angoni cattle in Mozambique. Isr J Vet Med 2000;55:2000.
  45. Schoeman SJ. Review: Recent research into the production potential of indigenous cattle with specific reference to Sanga. S Afr J Anim Sci 1989;19:55-61.
  46. Strydom PE, Naude RT, Smith MF, et al. Relationships between production and product traits in subpopulations of Bonsmara and Nguni cattle. S Afr J Anim Sci 2001;31:181-94.
  47. Muchenje V, Dzama K, Chimonyo M, Raats JG, Strydom PE. Tick susceptibility and its effects on growth performance and carcass Chimonyo characteristics of Nguni, Bonsmara and Angus steers raised on natural pasture. Animal 2008;2:298-304.
  48. Marufu MC, Chimonyo M, Mapiye C, Dzama K. Tick loads in cattle raised on sweet and sour rangelands in the low-input farming areas of South Africa. Trop Anim Health Prod 2011;43:307-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9690-3
  49. Muchenje V, Dzama K, Chimonyo M, Raats JG, Strydom PE. Meat quality of Nguni, Bonsmara and Aberdeen Angus steers raised on natural pasture in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Meat Sci 2008;79:20-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.026
  50. Nqeno N, Chimonyo M, Mapiye C. Farmers' perceptions of the causes of low reproductive performance in cows kept under low-input communal production systems in South Africa. Trop Anim Health Prod 2011;43:315-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9691-2
  51. Mapekula M, Mapiye C, Chimonyo M. Changes in metabolites concentration in Nguni and crossbred calves on natural pasture. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2011;24:1569-76. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11050
  52. Ndlovu T, Chimonyo M, Muchenje V. Monthly changes in body condition scores and internal parasite prevalence in Nguni, Bonsmara and Angus steers raised on sweetveld. Trop Anim Health Prod 2009;41:1169-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-008-9297-0
  53. Rony SA, Mondal MMH, Begun N, Islam MA, Affroze S. Epidemiology of ectoparasitic infestations in cattle at Bhawal Forest Area, Gazipur, Bangladesh. J Vet Med 2010;8:27-33.
  54. Davidi M. Tick control in tswana, simmental and brahma cattle by means of neem seed extracts (Azadirachta indica). Master's Dissertation. Pretoria, South Africa: University of Pretoria; 2006.
  55. Gashaw A. Host preference and seasonal variation of tick (Amblyomma cohaerens Donitz, 1909) on naturally infested cattle in jimma zone, southwestern Ethiopia. J Agric Rural Dev Trop Subtrop 2005;106:49-57.
  56. Olwoch JM, Reyers B, Engelbrecht FA, Erasmus BFN. Climate change and the tick-borne disease, Theileriosis (East Coast fever) in sub-Saharan Africa. J. Arid Environ 2008;72:108-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.04.003
  57. Smith ER, Parker DM. Tick communities at the expanding wildlife/ cattle interface in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa: implications for Corridor disease. J S Afr Vet Assoc 2010;81:237-40.
  58. Piper EK, Jonsson NN, Gondro C, et al. Immunological profiles of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle infested with the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2009;16:1074-86. https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.00157-09
  59. Scholtz MM, Spickett AM, Lombard PE, Enslin CB. The effect of tick infestation on the productivity of cows of three breeds of cattle. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 1991;58:71-4.
  60. Marufu CM, Chimonyo M, Dzama K, Mapiye C. Seroprevalence of tick-borne diseases in smallholder cattle reared on sweet and sour rangelands in a semi-arid area of South Africa. Vet J 2010;184:71-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.02.014
  61. Marufu MC, Chimonyo M, Mans BJ, Dzama K. Cutaneous hypersensitivity responses to Rhipicephalus tick larval antigens in pre-sensitized cattle. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2013;4:311-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2012.12.001
  62. Mapholi NO, Marufu MC, Maiwashe A, et al. Towards a genomics approach to tick (Acari: Ixodidae) control in cattle: a review. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2014;5:475-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.04.006
  63. Mwai O, Hanotte O, Kwon YJ, Cho S. African indigenous cattle: unique genetic resources in a rapidly changing world. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci 2015;28:911-21. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0002R
  64. Almekinders CJM. Incentive measures for sustainable use and conservation of agrobiodiversity. Experiences and lessons from Southern Africa. Lusaka, Zambia: Proceedings of a Workshop, 2002. pp. 11-14.
  65. Marufu MC, Dzama K, Chimonyo M. Cellular responses to Rhipicephalus microplus infestations in pre-sensitised cattle with differing phenotypes of infestation. Exp Appl Acarol 2014;62:241-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-013-9723-5
  66. Andersson L, Georges M. Domestic-animal genomics: deciphering the genetics of complex traits. Nat Rev Genet 2004;5:202-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1294
  67. Latif AA. Sustainable control methods for ticks and tick-borne diseases in Africa. In: Kategile JA, Mubi S, editors. Future of Livestock Industries in East and Southern Africa: Proceedings of the Workshop. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: International Livestock Centre for Africa;1993. pp. 119-22.
  68. Ndlovu DN, Makaya PV, Penzhorn BL. Tick infestation, udder and teat damage in selected cattle herds of Matebeleland South, Zimbabwe. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 2009;76:235-48.
  69. Dimander SO, Hoglund J, Sporndly E, Waller PJ. The impact of internal parasites on the productivity of young cattle organically reared on semi-natural pasture in Sweden. Vet Parasitol 2000;90:271-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(00)00256-9
  70. Vercruysse J, Claerebout E. Treatment vs. nontreatment of helminth infections in cattle: defining the thresholds. Vet Parasitol 2001;98:195-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(01)00431-9
  71. Coles GC. Anthelmintic resistance-looking to the future: a UK perspective. Res Vet Sci 2005;78:99-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2004.09.001
  72. Chimonyo M, Kusina NT, Hamudikuwanda H, Ncube I. Changes in stress-related plasma metabolite concentrations in working Mashona cows on dietary supplementation. Livest Prod Sci 2002;73:165-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00252-4
  73. Dreyer K, Fourie LJ, Kok DJ. Assessment of cattle owner's perceptions and expectations, and identification of constraints on production in a peri-urban, resource-poor environment. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 1999;66:95-102.
  74. Gasbarre LC, Leighton EA, Sonstergard T. Role of the bovine immune system and genome in resistance to gastrointestinal nematodes. Vet Parasitol 2001;98:51-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(01)00423-X
  75. Xhomfulana V, Mapiye C, Chimonyo M, Marufu MC. Supplements containing Acacia karroo foliage reduce nematode burdens in Nguni and crossbred cattle. Anim Prod Sci 2009;49:646-53. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN09028
  76. Marufu MC, Mapiye C, Chimonyo M. Nematode worm burdens in Nguni cattle on communal rangelands in a semi-arid area of South Africa. Res Opin Anim Vet Sci 2011;1:360-7.
  77. Naessens, J. Bovine trypanotolerance: A natural ability to prevent severe anaemia and haemophagocytic syndrome? Int J Parasitol 2006;36:521-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.02.012
  78. Noyes H, Brass A, Obara I, et al. Genetic and expression analysis of cattle identifies candidate genes in pathways responding to Trypanosoma congolense infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:9304-9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1013486108
  79. O'Gorman GM, Park SD, Hill EW, et al. Transcriptional profiling of cattle infected with Trypanosoma congolense highlights gene expression signatures underlying trypanotolerance and trypanosusceptibility. BMC Genomics 2009;10:207. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-10-207
  80. Stijlemans B, Vankrunkelsven A, Brys L, et al. Scrutinizing the mechanisms underlying the induction of anemia of inflammation through GPI mediated modulation of macrophage activation in a model of African trypanosomiasis. Microbes Infect 2010;12:389-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2010.02.006
  81. Gardener GE, McIntyre BL, Tudor GD, Pethick DW. The impact of nutrition on bovine muscle glycogen metabolism following exercise. Aust J Agric Res 2001;52:461-70. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR00108
  82. Baublits RT, Brown AH Jr, Pohlman FW, et al. Carcass and beef colour characteristics of three biological types of cattle grazing cool-season forages supplemented with soyhulls. Meat Sci 2004;68:297-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.03.009
  83. Thornton PK, van de Steeg J, Notenbaert A, Herrero M. The impacts of climate change on livestock and livestock systems in developing countries: A review of what we know and what we need to know. Agric Syst 2009;101:113-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2009.05.002
  84. Scholtz MM, McManus C, Leeuw KJ, et al. The effect of global warming on beef production in developing countries of the southern hemisphere. Nat Sci 2013;5:106-19.
  85. Nardone A, Ronchi B, Lacetera N, Ranieri MS, Bernabucci U. Effects of climate changes on animal production and sustainability of livestock systems. Livest Sci 2010;130:57-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.011
  86. Gregory NG. How climatic changes could affect meat quality. Food Res Int 2010;43:1866-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.05.018
  87. Bayer W, Deep frozen? Alive and kicking? Different approaches to the conservation of farm animal diversity. GIZ; 2006.
  88. Holt WV, Pickard AR. Role of reproductive technologies and genetic resource banks in animal conservation. Rev Reprod 1999;4:143-50. https://doi.org/10.1530/ror.0.0040143
  89. Rege JEO, Gibson JP. Animal genetic resources and economic development: issues in relation to economic valuation. Ecol Econ 2003;45:319-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00087-9
  90. FAO. World watch list for domestic animal diversity. 3rd edn. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2000.
  91. Gandini GC, Oldenbroek JK. Strategies for moving from conservation to utilisation. In: Oldenbroek JK, editor. Utilisation and Conservation of Farm Animal Genetic Resources. The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2007. p. 29-54.
  92. Pattison J, Drucker AG, Anderson S. The cost of conserving livestock diversity? Incentive measures and conservation options for maintaining indigenous Pelon pigs in Yucatan, Mexico. Trop Anim Health Prod 2007;39:339-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-007-9022-4
  93. Oldenbroek JK. Introduction. In: Oldenbroek JK, editor. Utilisation and conservation of farm animal genetic resources. The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2007. p. 13-27.
  94. Tada O. Indigenous cattle breeds of Zimbabwe: How applicable are the conservation strategies! UNISWA J. Agric 2011;15:110-6.
  95. Tada O, Muchenje V, Dzama K. Reproductive efficiency and herd demography of Nguni cattle in village-owned and group-owned enterprises under low-input communal production systems. Trop Anim Health Prod 2013;45:1321-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-013-0363-x
  96. Cromwell E. Incentive measures at the farmers' level to enhance use and conservation of agricultural biodiversity. In: Incentive Measures for Sustainable Use and Conservation of Agrobiodiversity. Experiences and Lessons from Southern Africa. Lusaka, Zambia: Proceedings of a Workshop; 2002. pp. 24-34.
  97. Ramsay K. Marketing rare breeds in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Incentive Measures for Sustainable Use and Conservation of Agrobiodiversity. Experiences and Lessons from Southern Africa. Lusaka, Zambia: Proceedings of a Workshop; 2002 p. 61-68.
  98. Tada O, Muchenje V, Madzimure J, Dzama K. Determination of economic weights for breeding traits in indigenous Nguni cattle under in-situ conservation. Livest Sci 2013;155:8-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.04.011
  99. Khombe CT. Crossbreeding Beef Cattle. Cattle Producers Association Harare, Zimbabwe. c1998 [Cited 2015 Jan]. Available from: http://agtr.ilri.cgiar.org/agtrweb/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=82
  100. Muchenje V, Chimedza-Graham R, Sikhosana JLN, et al. Milk yield of Jersey$\times$Nguni and Jersey$\times$Tuli F1 and F2 cows reared under smallholder farming conditions. S Afr J Anim Sci 2007;8:7-10.
  101. Barret JC. The economic role of cattle in communal farming systems in Zimbabwe. London, UK: Overseas Development Institute; 1992.
  102. Blackburn HD. The national animal germplasm program: challenges and opportunities for poultry genetic resources. Poult Sci 2006;85:210-5. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.2.210
  103. Woelders H, Zuidberg CA, Hienstra SJ. Animal genetic resources conservation in the Netherlands and Europe: poultry perspective. Poult Sci 2006;85:216-22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.2.216
  104. Tada O, Muchenje V, Dzama K. Monetary value of Nguni cattle and socio-economic profiles of farmers in the low-input communal production system of Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Afr J Bus Manag 2012; 6:11304-11. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM12.564
  105. Barker JSF. Conservation and management of genetic diversity: a domestic animal perspective. Can J For Res 2001;31:588-95. https://doi.org/10.1139/x00-180
  106. Mapiye C, Chimonyo M, Dzama K. Seasonal dynamics, production potential and efficiency of cattle in the sweet and sour communal rangelands in South Africa. J Arid Environ 2009;73:529-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.01.003
  107. Bester J, Matjuda LM, Rust JM, Fourie HJ. The Nguni: A case study. Irene, South Africa: Animal Improvement Institute; 2003. pp. 1-36.
  108. DRDAR (Department of Rural Development and Agrarian Reform). Eastern Cape Province, South Africa: Department of Rural Development and Agrarian Reform; 2011.
  109. Raats JG, Magadlela AM, Fraser GCG, Hugo A. Re-introducing Nguni Nucleus Herds in 100 Smallholder Villages of the Eastern Cape Province. A proposed co-operative project between the University of Fort Hare. East London, South Africa: Agricultural and Development Research Institute (ARDRI) and the Eastern Cape Department of Agriculture and the Kellogg Foundation; 2004.
  110. Minjauw B, McLeod A. Tick-borne diseases and poverty. The impact of ticks and tick-borne diseases on the livelihood of small-scale and marginal livestock owners in India and Eastern and Southern Africa. Research report, DFID Animal Health Programme. Edinburgh, UK: Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh; 2003.
  111. Faku N. Reintroduction of Nguni cattle breed in the rural communities of the Eastern Cape, South Africa. M.Sc. Thesis. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen University; 2009.
  112. Industrial Development Cooperation. IDC Newsletter. c2010 [Cited 2015 Aug] Available from: http://www.idc.co.za/access/includes/htmlnewsletter/pdf/full_newletter;2010.pdf
  113. Nguni KZN. KwaZulu Natal Nguni Cattle Club; c2012 [Cited 2015 Aug]. Available from: http://www.kznnguni.co.za/
  114. Scarpa R, Drucker AG, Anderson S, et al. Valuing genetic resources in peasant economies: the case of 'hairless' creole pigs in Yucatan. Ecol Econ 2003;45:427-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00095-8
  115. Drucker AG, Gomez V, Anderson S. The economic valuation of farm animal genetic resources: a survey of available methods. Ecol Econ 2001;36:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00242-1
  116. Zander KK. Modelling the value of farm animal genetic resources- facilitating priority setting for the conservation of cattle in East Africa. PhD Thesis. Bonn, Germany: University of Bonn; 2006.
  117. Hesterberg UW, Bagnall R, Perrett K, Horner R, Gummow B. A questionnaire survey of perceptions and preventive measures related to animal health amongst cattle owners of rural communities in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. J S Afr Vet Assoc 2007;78:205-8.
  118. Tada O, Muchenje V, Dzama K. Effective population size and inbreeding rate of indigenous Nguni cattle under in-situ conservation in the low-input communal production system. S Afr J Anim Sci 2013;43:137-42.
  119. Masika PJ, Mafu JV. Aspects of goat farming in the communal farming systems of the central Eastern Cape, South Africa. Small Rumin Res 2004;52:161-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00256-6
  120. Masikati, P. Improving the water productivity of integrated crop-livestock systems in the semi-arid tropics of Zimbabwe: an exante analysis using simulation modeling. [Cited 2011] Available from: http://www.zef.de/fileadmin/webfiles/downloads/zefc_ecology_development/eds_78_masikati_text.pdf
  121. Andersen HJ, Oksbjerg N, Young JF, Therkildsen M. Feeding and meat quality - a future approach. Meat Sci 2005;70:543-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.07.015
  122. Katiyatiya CLF, Muchenje V, Mushunje A. Farmer's perceptions and knowledge of cattle adaptation to heat stress and tick resistance in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2014;27:1663-70. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.14174
  123. Mapfumo L, Muchenje V. Comparative changes in monthly blood urea nitrogen, total protein concentrations, and body condition scores of Nguni cows and heifers raised on sweetveld. S Afr J Anim Sci 2015;45:96-103. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v45i1.12
  124. Van Soest PJ. Comparison of two different equations for predicting digestibility from cell contents, cell wall constituents and lignin content of ADF. J Dairy Sci 1995;48:815-23.
  125. Mapiye C, Chimonyo M, Marufu C, Dzama K. Seasonal changes in energy-related blood metabolites and mineral profiles of Nguni and crossbred cattle on communal rangelands in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2010;23:708-18. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2010.90419
  126. Mapiye C, Chimonyo M, Dzama K, Marufu MC. Protein status of indigenous Nguni and crossbred cattle in the semi-arid communal rangelands in South Africa. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2010;23:213-25.
  127. Adachi K, Kawano H, Tsuno K, et al. Values of the serum components in Japanese black beef steers at farms with high productivity and low frequencies of disease and death in Miyazaki Prefecture. J Vet Med Sci 1997;59:873-7. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.59.873
  128. Chawatama S, Mutisi C, Mupawaenda AC. The socio-economic status of smallholder livestock production in Zimbabwe: a diagnostic study. Livest Res Rural Dev 2005;17:988-1003.
  129. Ngongoni TN, Mapiye C, Mwale M, Mupeta B. Factors affecting milk production in the smallholder dairy sector of Zimbabwe. Livest Res Rural Dev 2006;18:Article #72.
  130. Homann S, van Rooyen A. Unexploited agricultural growth: The case of crop-livestock production systems in Zimbabwe. Bulawayo, Zimbabwe: Proceedings of the AAAE Conference; 2007. pp. 503-6.
  131. Mavedzenge BZ, Mahenehene J, Murimbarimba F, et al. Changes in the ivestock sector in Zimbabwe following land reform: The case of Masvingo Province; 2006. [Cited 2015 May] Available from: www.lalr.org.za
  132. Changadeya W, Ambali AJD, Nyirenda JC, Chagunda MGG, Kaunda E. Genetic diversity and population structure of Malawi Zebu cattle. Int J Phys Soc Sci 2012;2:59-81.
  133. Mashoko E, Muchenje V, Ndlovu T, et al. Beef cattle production in a peri-urban area of Zimbabwe. J Sust Dev Afr 2007;9:121-32.
  134. Gwaze FR, Chimonyo M, Dzama K. Smallholder goat production in Southern Africa: a review. Trop Anim Health Prod 2009;41:1157-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-008-9296-1
  135. Gil M, Serra X, Gispert M, et al. The effect of beef-production systems on the myosin heavy chain 1, the biochemical characteristics and the colour variables of Longissimus thoracis from seven Spanish beef cattle breeds. Meat Sci 2001;58:181-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00150-9
  136. FAO. Mixed crop-livestock farming: A review of traditional technologies based on literature and field experience. Traditional technologies for animal production, Chapter 5; Rome, Italy: FAO; 2001.
  137. Matlebyane MM, Ng'ambi JWW, Aregheore EM. Relationships between chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of some common forage species used for ruminant livestock production in three chief areas of Capricorn Region, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Res J Agric Biol Sci 2009;5:138-49.
  138. Van Rooyen AF. Livestock development in Southern Africa: Future research and investment priorities. Pretoria, South Africa: International Crop Research Institute for Semi Arid Tropics (ICRISAT); 2007.
  139. Ainslie A, Kepe T, Ntsebeza L, Ntshona Z, Turner S. Cattle ownership and production in the smallholder areas of the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Research report, Western Cape, South Africa: University of the Western Cape, South Africa; 2002.
  140. Winter B. Partners in research for development: from farm to market: South African cattle partnerships. Partners magazine; 20078-13. [Cited 2015 Dec] Available from: http://www.aciar.gov.au/publication/term/36
  141. Mueller JP, Rischkowsky B, Haile A, et al. Community-based livestock breeding programmes: essentials and examples. J Anim Breed Genet 2014;132:155-68.
  142. Nqeno N, Chimonyo M, Mapiye C, Marufu MC. Ovarian activity, conception and pregnancy patterns of cows in the semiarid communal rangelands in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Anim Reprod Sci 2010;118:140-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.07.006
  143. Nguni Cattle Breeders Society. Nguni 2011 25 Years - Breed from the past for the future. Bloemfontein, South Africa: Nguni Cattle Breeders Society; 2011. p. 29-34.
  144. Ligda Ch, Georgoudis A. Defining the breeding objectives for small populations. Kutna Hora, Czech Republic: Workshop: European Livestock Breeds Ark and Rescue Net (ELBARN); 2008.
  145. Kahi AK, Barwick SA, Graser HU. Economic evaluation of Hereford cattle breeding schemes incorporating direct and indirect measures of feed intake. Aust J Agric Res 2003;54:1039-55. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR03025
  146. Roessler R, Drucker AG, Scarpa R, et al. Using choice experiments to assess smallholder farmers' preferences for pig breeding traits in different production systems in North-West Vietnam. Ecol Econ 2008;66:184-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.023
  147. Scholtz MM, Theunissen A. The use of indigenous cattle in terminal cross-breeding to improve beef cattle production in Sub-Saharan Africa. Anim Genet Resour 2010;46:33-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633610000676
  148. Wollny CBA. The need to conserve farm animal genetic resources in Africa: should policy makers be concerned? Ecol. Econ 2003;45:341-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00089-2
  149. Mapiye C, Mwale M, Mupangwa JF, et al. A research review of village chicken production constraints and opportunities in Zimbabwe. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2008;21:1680-88. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.r.07
  150. Tada O, Muchenje V, Dzama K. Preferential traits for breeding Nguni cattle in low-input in-situ conservation production system. Springerplus 2013;2:195. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-195
  151. Kimaro WH, Mukandiwa L, Mario EZJ. Towards improving agricultural extension service delivery in the SADC region. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Information Sharing among Extension Players in the SADC Region; 2010. p. 26-28.
  152. Devendra C, Thomas D, Jabbar M, Zerbini E. Improvement of Livestock Production in Crop-Animal Systems in Agro-Ecological Zones of South Asia. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute; 2000.
  153. Toro MA, Villanueva B, Fernandez J. Genomics applied to management strategies in conservation programmes. Livest Sci 2014;166:48-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.04.020
  154. Meuwissen T, Hayes B, Goddard M. Accelerating improvement of livestock with genomic selection. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 2013;1:221-37. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103705
  155. Mpofu N. Comparison of indigenous and foreign cattle for beef production at Matopos Research Station in Zimbabwe. ZaBelo Livestock Consultancy, Zimbabwe. c2002 [Cited 2015 Oct]. Available from: http://agtr.ilri.cgiar.org/Casestudy/case-mpofu-1/casestudy-Mpofu-matchingenv-1.htm
  156. Keith J. The impact of cattle/beef prices on incomes and poverty in Botswana. Gaborone, Botswana: Report submitted to USAID/ Southern Africa; 2007.
  157. Dzanja J, Kapondamgaga P, Tchale H. Value chain analysis of beef in central and southern malawi. Int J Bus Soc Sci 2013;4:92-102.
  158. Sitoe T. Productive diversification. Southern Mozambique: Analysis of Horticultural Production in the Green Belt of Maputo City; 2010.
  159. Hangara GN, Teweldemedhin MY, Groenewald IB. Assessment on the constraints of cattle supply chain management in Namibia. Afr J Agric Res 2012;7:4876-84.
  160. Meissner HH, Scholtz MM, Palmer AR. Sustainability of the South African livestock sector towards 2050 Part 1: worth and impact of the sector. S Afr J Anim Sci 2013;43:282-97.
  161. Tembo G, Goma FY, Tembo A, Kabwe S. Productive potential, market access and smallholder livestock production: evidence from southern Zambia. Res Appl Econ 2014;6:132-48. https://doi.org/10.5296/rae.v6i2.5774
  162. Tuli Cattle Breeders Society of Zimbabwe. Gweru, Zimbabwe: Tuli. Modern press (pvt) Ltd;1995.
  163. Kotze A, Harun M, Otto F, Van der Bank FH. Genetic relationships between three indigenous cattle breeds in Mozambique. S Afr J Anim Sci 2000;30:92-7.
  164. Rechav Y, Kostrzewski MW, Els DA. Resistance of indigenous African cattle to the tick Amblyomma hebraeum. Exp Appl Acarol 1991;12:229-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01193469
  165. Norval RAI, Sutherst RW, Kerr JD. Infestation of the Amblyomma hebraeum (Acari: Ixodidae) on different breeds of the cattle in Zimbabwe. Exp Appl Acarol 1996;20:223-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00054514
  166. Frisch JE, O'Neill CJ. Comparative evaluation of beef cattle breeds of African European and Indian origins. 2. Resistance to cattle ticks and gastrointestinal nematodes. Anim Sci 1998;67:39-48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800009772
  167. Katiyatiya CLF, Muchenje V, Mushunje A. Seasonal variation in coat characteristics, tick loads, cortisol levels, some physiological parameters and temperature humidity index on Nguni cows raised in low- and high-input farms. Int J Biometeriol 2015;59:733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-014-0887-4
  168. Masika PJ, Afolayan AJ. Antimicrobial activity of some plants used for the treatment of livestock disease in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. J Ethnopharmacol 2002;83:129-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(02)00242-8

Cited by

  1. Genetic and phenotypic characterization of the native rabbits in Middle Egypt vol.11, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2018.1120-1126
  2. Genetic Improvement in South African Livestock: Can Genomics Bridge the Gap Between the Developed and Developing Sectors? vol.9, pp.1664-8021, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00331
  3. Comparative assessment of growth performance of three different indigenous goat breeds exposed to summer heat stress vol.102, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12892
  4. FERTILIZATION STRATEGIES IN CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE SYSTEMS WITH MAIZE-LEGUME COVER CROP ROTATIONS IN SOUTHERN AFRICA vol.53, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0014479716000387
  5. Leveraging Available Resources and Stakeholder Involvement for Improved Productivity of African Livestock in the Era of Genomic Breeding vol.10, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00357
  6. Constraints to the sustainability of a ‘systematised’ approach to livestock marketing amongst smallholder cattle producers in South Africa vol.17, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2019.1591658
  7. Productivity and profitability of manual and mechanized conservation agriculture (CA) systems in Eastern Zambia vol.34, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742170517000606
  8. Strategies for Sustainable Use of Indigenous Cattle Genetic Resources in Southern Africa vol.11, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/d11110214
  9. Integrating Agriculture and Ecosystems to Find Suitable Adaptations to Climate Change vol.8, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/cli8010010
  10. Livelihood, Food and Nutrition Security in Southern Africa: What Role Do Indigenous Cattle Genetic Resources Play? vol.12, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/d12020074
  11. Genetic diversity and relationships among three Southern African Nguni cattle populations vol.52, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-02066-y
  12. Animal genetic resources (AnGR) in Mozambique vol.482, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/482/1/012045
  13. Do haematological profiles of cows in drought prone areas differ with conformation? vol.18, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2020182-16029
  14. Advancing a holistic systems approach for sustainable cattle development programmes in South Africa: insights from sustainability assessments vol.44, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2020.1716130
  15. It depends on the rain: Smallholder farmers’ perceptions on the seasonality of feed gaps and how it affects livestock in semi-arid and arid regions in Southern Africa vol.34, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2021.100362
  16. Red Chittagong Cattle: An Indigenous Breed to Help Tackle the Challenges of Modern Animal Production Systems vol.5, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.688641
  17. Comparison of Acacia mearnsii and Medicago sativa as substitutes for Glycine max in cattle finisher diets: Effects on beef production and quality vol.11, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00673
  18. Heat stress and thermoregulatory responses of goats: a review vol.52, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2019.1603692
  19. Capitalizing on the Potential of South African Indigenous Beef Cattle Breeds: A Review vol.13, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084388
  20. Effects of pretreating in vitro matured of native Thai cattle oocyte with docetaxel before vitrification on their viability vol.756, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/756/1/012032