Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Behaviors and body weight of suckling piglets in different social environments

  • Hong, Joon-Ki (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Hyun (Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science) ;
  • Hwang, Hyun-Su (School of Bioresourceand Bioscience, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Kang (School of Bioresourceand Bioscience, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Eom, Tae-Kyung (School of Bioresourceand Bioscience, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Rhim, Shin-Jae (School of Bioresourceand Bioscience, Chung-Ang University)
  • Received : 2016.08.31
  • Accepted : 2016.11.18
  • Published : 2017.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to characterize the behaviors and the body weight of suckling piglets in different social environments. Methods: Two groups of sows and suckling piglets housed either in individual farrowing crates in separate pens ($1.8{\times}2.4m$, the control group) or in groups of three sows with their piglets in farrowing crates in a large common enclosure ($5.4{\times}2.2m$, the treatment group) were observed with the aid of video technology for 9 consecutive hours on days 1, 2, and 3, after mixing. Results: Suckling, agonistic, and elimination behaviors of suckling piglets were significantly higher in the control group than in the treatment group. Inactive behavior was higher in the treatment group than in the control group. Most of the effects of the social environment on the suckling piglets seem to be the result of large reductions in behaviors and body weight for piglets switching from high activity to low activity. Moreover, suckling behavior and birth body weight were highly correlated with body weight at the end of the test. Conclusion: The social environment that resulted from mixing, thus, had significant effects on the behavior and body weight of suckling piglets, and behavioral characteristics, therefore, should be considered when making improvements to the husbandry and care methods used in swine production.

Keywords

References

  1. Skok J, Skorjanc D. Fighting during suckling: Is it really an epiphenomenon? Ethology 2014;120:627-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12251
  2. Milligan BN, Fraser D, Kramer DL. Birth weight variation in the domestic pig: Effects on offspring survival, weight gain and suckling behavior. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2001;73:179-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00136-8
  3. Skok J, Skorjanc D. Formation of teat order and estimation of piglets’ distribution along the mammary complex using mid-domain effect (MDE) model. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2013;144:39-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.11.014
  4. Newberry RC. Environmental enrichment: increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1995;44:229-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)00616-Z
  5. Hill JD, McGlone JJ, Fullwood SD, Miller MF. Environmental enrichment influences on pig behavior, performance and meat quality. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1988;57:51-68.
  6. Kutzer T, Bunger B, Kjaer JB, Schrader L. Effects of early contact between non-littermate piglets and of the complexity of farrowing conditions on social behavior and weight gain. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2009;121:16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.08.004
  7. Appleby MC, Hughes BO. Understanding animal welfare. Oxon, UK: CABI; 1997.
  8. Kanaan VT, Lay DC, Richert BT, Pajor EA. Increasing the frequency of co-mingling piglets during the lactation period alters the development of social behavior before and after weaning. J Appl Anim Wel Sci 2012;15:163-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2012.658333
  9. Hayne SM, Gonyou HW. Behavioural uniformity or diversity? Effects on behavior and performance following regrouping in pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006;98:28-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.08.007
  10. Turner SP, Roehe R, D'Eath RB, et al. Genetic validation of postmixing skin injuries in pigs as an indicator of aggressiveness and the relationship with injuries under more stable social conditions. J Anim Sci 2009;87:3076-82. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1558
  11. Varley M, Wiseman J. The weaner pig. Oxford, UK: CABI; 2001.
  12. Hwang HS, Lee JK, Eom TK, et al. Behavioral characteristics of weaned piglets mixed in different groups. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2016;29: 1060-4.
  13. Broom DM. Animal welfare: concepts, study methods and indicators. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu 2011;24:306-21.
  14. Rhim SJ. Effects of group size on agonistic behaviors of commercially housed growing pigs. Rev Colomb Cienc Pec 2012;25:353-9.
  15. Verdon M, Morrison RS, Hemsworth PH. Rearing piglets in multilitter group lactation systems: effects on piglet aggression and injuries post-weaning. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2016;183:35-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.05.008
  16. Benson GJ, Rollin BE. The well-being of farm animals: Challenges and solutions. Ames, IA: Blackwell Publishing; 2004.
  17. Cox LN, Cooper JJ. Observations on the pre-and post-weaning behaviour of piglets reared in commercial indoor and outdoor environments. Anim Sci 2001;72:75-86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800055570
  18. Rookea JA, Bland IM. The acquisition of passive immunity in the new-born piglet. Livest Prod Sci 2002;78:13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00182-3
  19. Kielland C, Rootwelt V, Reksen O, Framstad T. The association between immunoglobulin G in sow colostrum and piglet plasma. J Anim Sci 2015;93:4453-62. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8713
  20. Puppe B, Tuchscherer A. Developmental and territorial aspects of suckling behaviour in the domestic pig. J Zool 1999;249:307-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb00767.x
  21. Li Y, Wang L. Effects of previous housing system on agonistic behaviors of growing pigs at mixing. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2011;132:20-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.03.009
  22. Rhim SJ, Son SH, Hwang HS, Lee JK, Hong JK. Effects of mixing on the aggressive behavior of commercially housed pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2015;28:1038-43. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0907
  23. Jensen P. The ethology of domestic animals: an introductory text. Oxon, UK: CABI; 2002.
  24. Hessel EF, Reiners K, Van den Weghe HFA. Socializing piglets before weaning: effects on behavior of lactating sows, pre-and postweaning behavior, and performance of piglets. J Anim Sci 2006;84:2847-55. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-606
  25. D'Eath RB. Socialising piglets before weaning improves social hierarchy formation when pigs are co-mingled post-weaning. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2005;93:199-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.11.019
  26. Oostindjer M, van den Brand H, Kemp B, Bolhuis JE. Effects of environmental enrichment and loose housing of lactating sows on piglet behavior before and after weaning. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2011;134: 31-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.06.011
  27. Houpt KA. Domestic animal behavior for veterinarians and animal scientists. Ames, IA: Blackwell Publishing; 1982.
  28. Giroux S, Robert S, Martineau GP. The effects of cross-fostering on growth rate and post-weaning behavior of segregated early-weaned piglets. Can J Anim Sci 2000;80:533-8. https://doi.org/10.4141/A99-122
  29. Skok J, Prevolink M, Urek T, Mesarec N, Skorjanc D. Behavioural patterns established during suckling reappear when piglets are forced to form a new dominance hierarchy. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2014;16: 42-50.
  30. Veenema AH. Early life stress, the development of aggression and neuroendocrine and neurobiological correlates: what can we learn from animal models? Front Neuroendocrinol 2009;30:497-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.03.003
  31. Statham P, Green L, Bichard M, Mendl M. A longitudinal study of the effects of providing straw at different stages of life on tail-biting and other behavior in commercially housed pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2011;134:100-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.08.009