References
- Bockmann R, Meyns J, Dik E, Kessler P. The modifications of the sagittal ramus split osteotomy: a literature review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015;2:e271.
- Dal Pont G. Retro-molar osteotomy for correction of prognathism. Minerva Chir 1959;14:1138-41.
- Nishioka GJ, Aragon SB. Modified sagittal split technique for patients with a high lingula. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;47:426-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(89)90352-2
- Ueki K, Okabe K, Miyazaki M, Mukozawa A, Marukawa K, Nakagawa K, et al. Position of mandibular canal and ramus morphology before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:1795-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.106
- Chuong CJ, Borotikar B, Schwartz-Dabney C, Sinn DP. Mechanical characteristics of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: comparing 2 different fixation techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:68-76.
- Wolford LM, Bennett MA, Rafferty CG. Modification of the mandibular ramus sagittal split osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;64:146-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(87)90080-6
- Turvey TA, Bell RB, Tejera TJ, Proffit WR. The use of selfreinforced biodegradable bone plates and screws in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:59-65.
- Oguz Y, Uckan S, Ozden AU, Uckan E, Eser A. Stability of locking and conventional 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:174-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.051
- Chiodo TA, Ziccardi VB, Janal M, Sabitini C. Failure strength of 2.0 locking versus 2.0 conventional Synthes mandibular plates: a laboratory model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:1475-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.027
- Pozzer L, Olate S, Cavalieri-Pereira L, de Moraes M, Albergaria-Barbosa JR. Influence of the design in sagittal split ramus osteotomy on the mechanical behavior. Int J Clin Exp Med 2014;7:1284-8.
- Trauner R, Obwegeser H. The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. I. Surgical procedures to correct mandibular prognathism and reshaping of the chin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1957;10:677-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-4220(57)80063-2
- Haug RH. Effect of screw number on reconstruction plating. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993;75:664-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(93)90418-4
- Gutwald R, Alpert B, Schmelzeisen R. Principle and stability of locking plates. Keio J Med 2003;52:21-4. https://doi.org/10.2302/kjm.52.21
- Ribeiro-Junior PD, Magro-Filho O, Shastri KA, Papageorge MB. Which kind of miniplate to use in mandibular sagittal split osteotomy? An in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41:1369-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.05.003
- Ribeiro-Junior PD, Magro-Filho O, Shastri KA, Papageorge MB. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:724-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.018
- Schwartz HC, Relle RJ. Bicortical-monocortical fixation of the sagittal mandibular osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:234-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90457-7
- Sato FR, Asprino L, Consani S, Noritomi PY, de Moraes M. A comparative evaluation of the hybrid technique for fixation of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement by mechanical, photoelastic, and finite element analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;114(5 Suppl):S60-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.08.027
- Andrade VC, Olate S, Pozzer L, Cavalieri-Pereira L, de Moraes M, de Albergaria-Barbosa JR. Photoelastic evaluation of two different sagittal split ramus osteotomies in advancement surgery. Int J Clin Exp Med 2014;7:1940-4.