대한산업공학회지 (Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)

  • 제43권2호
  • /
  • Pages.120-126
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1225-0988(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6457(eISSN)
대한산업공학회 (Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국방분야의 연구개발 특성분석을 통한 무기체계 품질향상 방향 제시

The Direction Presentation for Quality Improvement of Weapon System based on R&D Characteristics in Defense Field

  • 박상은 (국방과학연구소 공용기술센터) ;
  • 홍재영 (국방과학연구소 공용기술센터)
  • Park, Sangeun (Common Technology Center, Agency for defense development) ;
  • Hong, Jaeyoung (Common Technology Center, Agency for defense development)
  • 투고 : 2016.11.07
  • 심사 : 2017.03.21
  • 발행 : 2017.04.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper has proposed the development direction and R&D analysis approach that the diversity of defense R&D process and product should be mainly under consideration. It has shown that there is a fair possibility of the various quality assess to meet the R&D requirements in defense-based. Thus, the analysis on multiple quality elements is carried out with defense R&D characteristics. Especially, a quality management master planning based on the quality model of establishing defense R&D policy has proposed, identifying relevant quality characteristics on the R&D of weapon system and the R&D of core technology. That is, this paper is not only interested in determining an appropriate model for improving the quality of a R&D weapon system but also argued efforts in order to reap the best possible outcome and process on both the R&D of weapon system and quality of the R&D of core technology including present R&D activities.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. DAPA Instructions 294th. (2014), The management regulations on Defense Acquisition program (Revised 2014. 7. 24).
  2. Fahmy, S., Haslinda, N., Roslina, W., and Fariha, Z. (2012), Evaluating the quality of software in e-book using the ISO 9126 mode, International Journal of Control and Automation, 5(2), 115-122.
  3. Garvin, D. A. (1984), What Does "Product Quality" Really Mean?, Sloan Management Review, Harvard University.
  4. Hong, J.-Y. and Park, S.-E. (2015), A quality enhancement strategy of weapon system in defense R&D, 2015 fall conf. on korea military and science technology.
  5. Kim, Y.-C. (2011), Quality Management, Wooyong Chulpansa, Seoul, Korea.
  6. Kim, Y.-S. and Park, S.-E. (2014), A comparative study with traditional definitions of quality to improve defense R&D quality, 2014 Fall Korea Quality Congress, 116-117.
  7. Krapp, M. (2001), Quality assurance in research and development an insoluble dilemma?, Fresenius J Anal Chen, 371(6), 704-713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002160100986
  8. Kumar, P. (2012), Aspect-Oriented Software Quality Model: The AOSQ MODEL, Advanced Computing : An International Journal(ACIJ), 3(2), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.5121/acij.2012.3212
  9. Park, S.-E. and Kim, Y.-S. (2014), An analysis on the characteristics of quality elements for 2-track to improve R&D quality based on defense R&D process, Conf. on Korea Military Science and Technology, 201-202.
  10. Park, S.-E. and Kim, Y.-S. (2015), A total quality management master planning based on a new R&D quality model, 2015 conf. on korea military and science technology, 1659-1660.
  11. Park, S.-E., and Kim, Y.-S. (2014), A study on relationships of eight dimensions of quality for improving of key-technology development in defense R&D, 2014 Fall Korea Quality Congress, 120-121.
  12. Park, Y.-T. (2014), Quality Management, Korea Standards Association media, Seoul, Korea.
  13. Roberts, G. W. (1983), Quality Assurance in Research and Development, Marcel Dekker, INC.
  14. Wadsworth, H. M., Stephens, K. S., and Godfrey, A. B. (2002), Modern methods for quality control and improvement, John Wiley & Sons.
  15. Yoon, J. (2015), The development of R&D Quality model, 2015 Spring joint conference.
  16. Yoon, J. (2017), A Quality Management Model relevant to R&D Characteristics, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, submitted.